Write Review
1,979,340 Total Reviews 3,607 New Reviews
9,290 Users Online

Newbie - FAQ

Is P2P just as risky as BBFS?
TonyVarela 3132 reads
posted

I recently saw a provider who does full nude massages with P2P.

Wondering if doing P2P is just as risky as BBFS?  

Should I go get tested?

RobertJdn1456 reads

Posted By: TonyVarela
I recently saw a provider who does full nude massages with P2P.

Wondering if doing P2P is just as risky as BBFS?  

Should I go get tested?

I'm not sure what P2P is.  But assuming it's private touching private during a massage, then the answer is definitely no, not nearly as risky as BBFS.  If there is no penetration, then the risk is not even close, not even in the same ballpark.  I'm pretty sure your only potential STD risk with no penetration and privates touching would be HSV and even that would be extremely remote.  Without seeing some kind of blisters or sores on your partner I wouldn't worry about it.  If you notice any symptoms I'd definitely have it checked out but since your risk was so remote your only problem now is going to be your unfounded anxiety.

ReplyQuoteReport
Mars622549 reads

I presume p2p means "pay to play", in which case, she is just saying that she escorts.

In general, BBFS is a big "no". Too much STD/HIV risk.

BBFS is never safe (except in a monogamous relationship). P2P can be relatively safe if she escorts safely.

ReplyQuoteReport
TonyVarela1031 reads

Here P2P means privates to privates.

I know the difference.

Penetration or not, the juices are still the same and still flowing.  I guess as long as I don't have any open cuts I'm okay.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!