I was reading a review on a new provider working for a local service in my city. I see that there is a profile page that has information about the provider and then the links to the TER members reviews of that provider.
What is confusing me is why the profile page says CIM - Yes spits out and none of the three reviews mention such activity. Am I missing something? This could be a big oops during the date. Could anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks. This board is very helpful.
It's possible that even though CIM and spits is something the provider will do it didn't take place in these reviewers sessions. I see providers that will do CIM but I don't always partake of that service.
I guess. YMMV comes into play here. Many providers have told me I'm attractive and I always come very clean and well groomed. I personally have had little problems with providers but CIM is not something I guess at. That could go either way with anyone.
I recently read a response to another members question by a provider. She stated that it is better to wait until after you have left the gift and gone BCD to ask about things like that. It makes sense, LE would never have left a donation and started in on the fun, so the lady feels more comfortable at that phase of the date. At that point it just comes down to having some tact.
If you ask nicely, its simply a yes or a no
It's a good idea to ask if the reviews you have read don't say that it happened but the profile says it is available. Whenever seeing a provider for the first time it's a good idea to ask period because you are correct about the YMMV factor. Asking tactfully during the activities works. It shows respect and it will be appreciated.
also wonder about the accuracy of reviews and scores. I've seen ladies listed as bbbj or anal or whatever, but no reviewer says they recieved that service in the juicies. Since reviewers are the ones to list the service, I've never understood this. Anal being offered and not taken, I understand, but when a provide is listed as BBBJ and every reviewer says she only did CBJ, I don't understand.
Another thing I've noticed are some providers getting 9's and 10's on service, but don't offer any BBBJ or anal in their services, and no reviewer lists that as being performed or offered. I thought those were prerequisites... I, in fact, had to redo a review that was rejected because the provider didn't offer these services but did offer others at no charge (pics), and the board said I had to revise the score to fit within the guidelines.
I do think that providers that don't offer MSOG should also lose eligibility for another point, making their max 7 if they don't offer all 3, as it would fit more into the paying for time not service model, but that's just me.
IF it says bbbj and consistently only cbj performed I would file a problem report and have it changed. I would think the provider would want it changed so her clients wouldn't come in expecting something not offered. Of course it could be a YMMV thing. All it takes is a couple of reviews where a bbbj was performed to make that profile item legit.
Regarding the 9's and 10's but no bbbj or anal - if she kisses with tongue (TER parlance) and is really bi then she could receive a 9 but not a 10. (Since she receives one point for any of the four activities that increase the rating, any 3 of the four would make receiving a 10 possible.) You could point that out to TER when you see it.
I agree with you about the msog. I don't care about the really bi. Unless it's a double it doesn't matter anyway. Take the really bi out of the extra points possibility and add msog. That's only if your going to keep the "rate a lady on something that didn't happen in the session" mentality.
However , I think that's stupid. The rating should always be for what actually happened and a rating of 10 should always be a possibility.
None of the other replies have addressed this yet. You say she is new; there must be only a few reviews, so far. Send a PM to each of the reviewers and ask for more detail, specifically about your CIM concern, and see what they say. If the original reviewer (who created the Profile) says "I made a mistake. No CIM." then that clears that up.
What about her ad / web page? Some list explicit details of services offered. Anything there? FAQs on her web page?
Here's another possibility along this same line... I posted three reviews about three days ago. The first was approved and the second two i've had to work on for more detail. The approved one showed up with a different girls name. I believe this is due to the fact they both work at the same lingerie shop and use the same phone number. I am emaling back and forth with admin to try and get it fixed but so far it's not. So there's a review out there about girl x with y's name on it.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
