Newbie - FAQ

Newb with question after my "first time"
rindt 1 Reviews 2725 reads
posted

I had a session with "the girl of my dreams" last week. My first time as a hobbyist. I did my research. She was the one. Unbelievable experience.

But...

A couple of things which went down (pun intended) have me a little concerned. First, she initiated contact between our genitals without any protection on. No penetration, just contact. Safe??

Also, she gave me a BBBJ. Safe??

I really want to see her again. But I don't want a STD. Are my concerns well founded?

but you have a right to make things as safe as you want.

Just let the gal know that you want any contact to be covered and she should be willing to comply.

Also, as you probably know, it's a little late to be asking these questions.  If you were concerned you should have told her then and there.  You are the client and the session is supposed to go as you wish, within reason.  Having said this, you will probably be fine.

Bottom Line:

1. No risk at all

2. Some risk of some STD, but very very rare, considered to be safe sex(BBBJ) by some experts on STD for the receiving partner. 0 risk of HIV. You might want to consider CBJ if you are apprehensive.

Read attached link below for risks of all kinds of activities. Also an opinion of Health care experts on STDs is that most escorts have a much lower risk of carrying std than your avg civie girl.

Unprotected oral is generally not too risky, though there is acknowledged risk.

However, unprotected genital-to-genital contact (slide-n-glide or camel slide) is quite risky for non-HIV (and some risk for HIV) STDs such as Herpes & Chlamydia (warts).

Even protected sex (intercourse) with the standard condom is risky as the standard cover often allows some genital contact. The risk here is lower, but not zero.

May I know the source of your information? Chlamydia transmission requires contact of male urethra with the female secretions from cervix or contact of the female cervix with male secretions. How does this happen in dry humping? Because if there is such a contact, it no longer is dry humping and becomes penetrative sex.

BTW, warts are not caused by chlamydia but HPV. There is a theoretical risk of Herpes and HPV with dry humping and also a theoretical risk of other ulceration STDs such as LGV, Syphilis. But usually these types of transmission happens when there are obvious visible lesions.

Mutual mastrubation with genital secretions usually do not cause STDs(according to many leading STD experts), because the brief exposure to the air usually kills the virus/bacteria.


Of course none of the above is 100%, everyone agrees that to be 100% safe you have to either abstain or be in a mutually monogamous relationship. But defnly use of condom brings the your risk as close to 100% as possible. The reason why Condoms are not said to be 100% is because there has never been an effective study due to practical, ethical reasons where the research of usage of condoms could be studied.

Posted By: hound_dog69
Unprotected oral is generally not too risky, though there is acknowledged risk.

However, unprotected genital-to-genital contact (slide-n-glide or camel slide) is quite risky for non-HIV (and some risk for HIV) STDs such as Herpes & Chlamydia (warts).

Even protected sex (intercourse) with the standard condom is risky as the standard cover often allows some genital contact. The risk here is lower, but not zero.

Register Now!