Personally, I prefer to finish uncovered on some delectable part of the body but other time finishing inside is nice too.

I would mention this in a review so that future potential clients will be aware of this pecularity.

I had the same thing happen to me.  The rule was, covered for everything, no finish (even while covered) anywhere inside her (mouth or otherwise).

In my, and probably most everyone's, opinion this is not GFE.  I know that the term itself is a little nebulous, but not THAT nebulous.

BTW, her profile still shows BBBJ.  Important to keep those profiles updated.  But always read the review comments.

Sounds like you ran in to an unusual one.  I have never encountered that in a visit.

It is not unusual for the provider to reach down and check the condom isn't sliding off or ask for a condom check or change out, but I've never had one ask not to cum inside mouth or vagina with a condom on.

In my experience, I have been with girls who prefer that I not climax inside them as a sort of protocol in case the condom did break. And checking the condom a number of times is a good way to stay safe. Nowadays, I do all of the above to ensure that she and I don't share bodily fluids when we don't want to.

As for how this relates to GFE, I don't think it does. But it is certainly a quirk of hers that you should mention in a review.

Never has happened to me in over 5 years of hobbying.  Not sure if it affects GFE status.

I agree with mrfisher that I actually prefer to finish uncovered on the lady. My ATF loves to see me ejaculate and each session ends with BBBJ to completion on various parts of her anatomy...

I don't know if this issue would effect her GFE status. As many have said, the term has become fairly vague over the last few years.  I would write an accurate review and let customers decide if this lady is for them or not. Personally, it would not be a deal breaker for me.