A hobbyiest that consistently scores average to low, in looks and appearance, regardless of the ladies he seeks does catch my attention. If a gentleman gives me his handle info, I do some research on him too, to find out what experiences he enjoys, if he has a routine, or to find out little things to make sure his time is enjoyable. If the content of his reviews is nit-picky and too high maintenance for the experience that I provide, I may question his interest in me or ask what does he seek by contacting me. I would hate to think that a gentleman would want to spend his $$$ to meet a well-reviewed lady with a decent reputation, just to bash her, but we all have our motives.

I did have a situation occur where a gentleman contacted me and NEVER gave higher than an 7 in looks and a 6 in performance! Currently, my scores are at an 8+ in both areas and it really didn't seem like I'd be his type anyway. If you constantly refuse to have a good time or seek out ladies that just don't do it for you, why hobby? I think the saddest part is low scores are a reflection of him and his inability to compromise. The issues he may have with accepting a provider for who she is and letting go to have a good time may also be why there isn't much success in his world at dating as a civvie. My theory must've held true because our schedules didn't match and he got frustrated and went away, so  I did not have to openly reject him. The consistent low scoring would've been an issue for me.

if other reviewers are giving 9/10 then this newbie needs someone to explain to him how the system works. I personally don't care about the scores since most of my regular clients don't post reviews and my business is just fine. But a lady who depends on those scores would definitely think twice about seeing this type of reviewer.