Just posted a few reviews.  Thought I gave one of the gals a 9 on performance, yet when looking at the review she has an 8. Is there a way I can have this changed?  Do TER moderators sometimes change scores based on services offered?  I read in post elsewhere that a 8 was the highest score a hobbiest was able to give by TER guidelines????

The reviews are a double edged sword. I have a recent one that is a 6/6. I asked him why those numbers. If you look at the bulk of them that's ridiculous.

The guy didn't do a thing with the numbers. He wrote a great review and forgot he had to change them. Too late. Now I'm stuck with a 6/6 on my review list. That takes my overall ranking WAY down.

I know there are guidelines. Certain services have to be offered for certain numbers to be allowed. Although, I know that not every girl who gets a 10 has done anal. Supposedly that is the criteria.

Personally, I think it's bullhockey. If YOU thought it was a 10 and she only did a few of the acronyms that's all that matters. But, I'm not TER.

Feisty tonight.
Anneke

Only a statatition would be overly concerned about your 6,6 score. Any thinking hobbyist would look at 15 pages of INCREDIBLE REVIEWS, and know that Anneke is a legend.

I think TER does lower the numbers sometimes, if their criteria is not met.

Jim

My guess is that your review is for the lady where you provided the following details:

blow job: Yes without Condom
cum in mouth: No
touch pussy: Yes - On the Inside
lick pussy: Yes
kiss: Yes - Without Tongue
anal: Don't Know
two girl action: Don't Know
more than one guy: Don't Know
multiple pops: Don't know
rimming: Don't Know

Per TER Review Guidelines:
"please try to save the 8 and 9 ranks for situations where out of the ordinary services are provided (i.e. Blow Job - without condom, Kissing with tongue, Really Bi, More than one guy). Each of these, beyond-the-call-of-duty talents count for one hard earned point."

From what I see, she has 1 point above 7 for BBBJ. Thus max 8 on performance.

A lower average score puts Anneke at risk of being excluded when a hobbiest does a rating based search.

and when I asked, the response was that since it was a massage visit, 7 is the highest that could be offered.

GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING REVIEWS when you submitted your reviews?

Right there in black and white they lay out the ratings system for you and tell you that if you don't abide by the rules, they can, and will adjust the scores.


7.) In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also willing to performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point.

This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score.

If your review doesn’t already accurately reflect this rating system, we will adjust it.

That gents WILL look at those 15 pages of reviews and get what happened. Still, it smarts.

Hey, I have a big ego. I'll be the first to admit it. I don't expect 9's and 10's for looks as a mature provider. That's a fact of life. But I always aim for at least a 9, hopefully a 10 for service. To my mind, if he's thinking it's a service I haven't done my best.

Many thanks for the kind words.

And Mr. Fisher, my sexy friend, see you soon.

Kisses,
Anneke

TJ196515, his average review performance score is a 6.8, so he is a consistently low scorer.

Your Average Looks Score is 7.67 and your Average Performance Score is 8.77, putting you in the top echelon of providers on this board.

As far as the guidelines go, this is what the guidelines are that every guy has to agree to in order to post his review:

RE Performance Ratings: An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also willing to performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point.

This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score.

Terrev, excellent reply as usual.  I know you copied "7.)" verbatim, but I do want to clarify something that I think is an error.  Where it states "...or More than One Guy", I believe that is a mistake on TER's part that should read "...or More than One Pop".  Whether I'm technically wrong or right, it is something that seems to enable a provider to earn a higher score.  Soooo ladies, if you want higher scores you should definitely consider offering "more than one pop" for your clients.  Hell, many guys can't even go for the 2nd cup.  But it sure is nice to know that it's offered, and it's something you want listed as "offered" in regards to how it could affect your score.

as many ladies here. I am a mature over 50 lady who has many friends who would love to give me a 10. Because I refuse to put things on my profile to open that door, they think a 10 is not possible to give. I save things for special friends.

If you are a gentlemen and wanted to give me a 10 do you think TER would change it. I do have a 10 on a review that was not changed. Since I am not a gentlemen I don't know about the number guidelines.

Kisses Haley

"More than one pop" would be much more informative to me than "more than one guy", or "Really Bi" or "Greek" for that matter.

Greek may be of some importance, but the other two are completely meaningless to me. For that matter "more than one cup" rarely applies to me in a one hour session, but the fact that it is offered ensures the fact that she is not a clock watcher and that fact is very important to me.

...Is not a mistake. It is one of several activities that will earn a lady an extra point above the high of 7. Is it meaningful to most of us? No not really!  There is a section "for more than one pop" in the profile as well. Doing it or not doing it does not earn extra points though I'm sure it influences a lot more guys in their decision making process than a lady being willing to do multiple guys does...

You are a 10 in my book and I have not yet met you . That wood for sure  go up (so to speak ) when we do finally get together .


Thank You
XLIII = 4

I recently submitted a review for a lady that impressed me very much. The review was not approved. First, the performance score is being lowered by TER. Second, I described in the review that the lady gave me a genital on genital massage, and TER said that I had to remove the description because it was "bare back full service" though I clearly stated that no actual penetration occurred....  oh well. I hope that the review eventually makes it  - it will be my 20th. I have only had one rejected in the past, because the lady took down her website.

... how?  

I'm not trying to bust your chops here, mind you.  But I am curious.  Unless someone at TER told you otherwise, I'm pretty certain that having "Yes" checked in the field "More than one pop" (or "multiple pops" or whatever term they use) on a provider's Profile Page is one of the criteria that can earn a provider the higher scores.  I know lots of non-bi, non-greek, single-guy-at-a-time ladies who are getting 9's & 10's.  And it's b/c they DO OFFER more than one cup, along with BBBJ and kissing!  CIM is also another of the criteria that seems to be used.

I know all of this because I have written, under three different handles over the years, over sixty reviews. I have read item #7 on the rules for reviews page dozens of times. The item has already been cut and pasted into this thread twice so I'm not going to do it again.  If you go and read it you will see that there are five services that can entitle to a provider to a score above a seven. CIM is not one of them and neither is multiple pops.

There are no mistakes or miss prints in item #7 but there ARE some cases of guys giving a girl a 10 without her performing enough of the required services to deserve it. Unless someone complains about it this sort of thing slips through some times.

A lady doesn't have to be bi, offer Greek or do two guys at once to get a nine by the way. All she has to do is Kiss with tongue and BBBJ.


The fact is I have seen many numbers changed over the years when a complaint was issued for a lady getting a ten without meeting all of the requirements. Unfortunately the review system is not perfect since human beings read the reviews and compare the scores to the lady's profiles. Things get missed but the criteria is what it is. it's all there in black and white.  

My ATF can not get a ten because, even though she allows as many pops as a guy can come up with she won't do greek or two guys.  She also won't allow her profile to be changed to "really bi" just to qualify.  Quite a few ladies do that, even though they will never get near another woman, just to qualify for a ten.

I don't make things up and I don't make assumptions. I deal in the facts as they are written all over the board in black and white. I also rely on five plus years of postings and PM's from providers and other reviewers about these issues.

Multiple pops are pretty standard for any decent GFE provider. CIM is not as many women feel it is just too much of a health risk.  Although I think it is important for their to be a category for both of those services I don't think it's that big of a deal that there are no extra points awarded. I've seen a lot of guys say in the review that they took points off for lack of CIM or would not repeat because it wasn't offered.
I would say without a doubt that the vast majority of PM's I get asking about ladies I have seen ask if she allows CIM!


-- Modified on 10/8/2008 6:16:02 PM

her current 8.77 to an 8.79...hardly a significant change...when have you ever excluded someone by 2 hundredths of a point?

Come On...At least do the math if you are going to try and hang someone for a mistake.



Just FYI the following scores would have resulted in the following overall averages:

9 = 8.79 Average
8 = 8.78 Average
7 = 8.78 Average
6 = 8.77 Average

It's written right in the FAQ's. This is not one man's opinion, BG is stating the facts as published by TER. I would think that someone with several reviews going back over four years would already know this, it's been the topic of many a thread.

I've written over 25 reviews myself under a couple of different handles also over a 5+ year period.  Obviously, we both know a bit bout reviews and the process.  I know exactly what "rule #7" states.  And while not trying to argue with you, I'll stick to my belief as it's been what my "experiences" have shown me.  Obviously, your point about the review system not being perfect with human beings missing things is correct.  However for all your ramblings about things written in black & white & not making things up but dealing in facts, you don't account for the possibility that it could be a "miss print" or a "mistake".  Rather, you simply state that it is not!  Your reply was interesting and informative.  And it may be 100% correct.  At the moment though, I'm still not convinced.

It's been the same sentence for as long as I've been reading it. Sorry my friend but it's a little hard for me to believe that TER would not have fixed a typo by now that effects the entire review process.

I'm not accounting for the possibility of it being a mistake because it isn't.

Hey, I said I was stubborn!

Probably not so much a "missprint" as an "uninclusive statement".  Like I said b4, in my experiences it sure seems as if TER allows for "multiple pops" and "CIM" to enable a provider's score to be elevated just as the other criteria that's listed in "rule #7".  With the number of reviews & problem reports that come in to them, it's very easy for me to believe that TER would not have fixed a statement that's buried in their info & policy regulations.  

Put it this way, ever work for a large company and get a company handbook?  You discover a typo or grammatical mistake (that is actually pretty embarrassing) and point it out to the HR dept.  They thank you.  A year later, they pass out a new handbook, as there have been some policy changes, updates, etc.  Sure enough, what didn't get changed?  You guessed it.  The error that you had brought to their attention!  Attention to detail has been slipping for decades!  Mistakes get made!  And you're not the only one who's stubborn!

Sorry S, I'm just not buying it. You will come up with an argument for every point of accurate information that I post so I'm not going to waste any more time trying to explain reality here...carry on...

Besides, I'm gettin' laid in a few hours so this is all suddenly unimportant to me...

Yeah, I guess your 60+ reviews make you more of an expert than my 25+ reviews!  What was I thinking?  Glad you're getting laid; it definitely seems like it's overdue for you!

-- Modified on 10/10/2008 10:47:45 AM