see you and keep telling you that he would review you before and after you saw him and then not give you a review.  this person has reviewed over 100 providers.  fellas after you see a provider how long does it take you normally to give a review.

If it has been a few days since the date, just give it some time.
Most guys aren't going to rush home and write a review.
Some wait until the "afterglow" fades before writing one.

...Some guys take the entire time, submitting their review right before the deadline. After 90 days TER won't accept the review. I have normally done my reviews within two weeks. I have waited as long as a month.

if he has been around awhile..he will get to it..some guys just take their sweet time about it..i usually write mine within a few days..otherwise the details tend to blur with other sessions i have had..you have only 10 reviews so i know you put some stock in it..just dont worry too much about it..we here at TER always take care of our own..

Many guys do this same thing, and at times it might be better if they don't review you. If you are this hell bent on getting that review, it makes you appear dramatic, especially since you posted a thread about it. It is possible that he might not want to hurt your feelings with the score he has in his head, and that score might not be a 9 or a 10.  

2-3 days unless he is a new reviewer and/or you are a new provider.  Not the case in your situation.  The last one I wrote got posted within 15 minutes, I was stunned.  I hardly everf submit the review the day I saw the provider.  I may write it that day, but will give it a day or two, go back and reread it to see if it needs editing.  I type the details in a word processor, then copy it into the TER review form after I have entered all the provider's information.

will take a few days for the review to be approved. All in all, possibly as long as 2 weeks to get the review posted.

Sometimes us guys lie to not hurt your feelings or give ok reviews. We are being nice.

. . . that old adage my mother taught me, "if you don't have something good to say about someone, don't say anything."  Not every meeting is memorable enough to warrant a glowing review. Knowing that YMMV, I often skip the review, not wanting to ding the lady with a poor rating. I know this doesn't help my hobby brothers, but there have been a number of times when I've used their reviews to guide me and have been utterly disappointed.  Either the looks or performance were way off, IMHO, from what I had expected. In these cases, I assume it's me and not the lady, so I choose not to document the encounter, especially if my rating would be an obvious outlier.