Newbie - FAQ

Isn't it more about protecting the ad?
rightonppl 29 Reviews 805 reads
posted

My understanding has always been that such disclaimers are intended to protect the provider from charges of ADVERTISING an illegal service, not from providing one. Whether it does what it intends to I have no idea. And I doubt if the distinction is understood by many escorts who include it.

dfwjim1232284 reads

(1). Is this wording good from a legal standpoint?  
(2). Would it protect a provider?
(3). If a male LE is pretending as a customer and ask for sex (without the actual acts), is it a case of "entrapment"?

U_R_Screwed1023 reads

Rigid screening is the only hope, and LE can make all kinds of fake front companies if they choose.

IMO, other ladies that you know and trust are the best screening.


No to all...

Just make sure she screens you AND she has reviews...preferably decent ones...

Good luck.

My understanding has always been that such disclaimers are intended to protect the provider from charges of ADVERTISING an illegal service, not from providing one. Whether it does what it intends to I have no idea. And I doubt if the distinction is understood by many escorts who include it.

Register Now!