Curious to know if providers go all bare with proof of a full panel test. Anyone tired this? Assuming if yes, then the provider provides one as well.

That panel is useless, Google false negatives. Don't be silly, gross.

from 3 days ago doesn't mean they are clean.  Could have been with many others since the test.  Low volume generally means less than 5 dates per day.  Go figure.

you aren't gonna find it out here.  Ask on another forum, like your regional board.  We're here for the newbs. not the idiots.

Swim

Many guys ask for BBFS and there are plenty of girls that provide BBFS . Ask any girl your with how often she gets asked to do BBFS . You will be shocked

You'd be surprised how many girls offer BBFS. Considering some of the said providers I met (for a covered session) still claim to be clean and boast clean tests, I'm guessing a recent test might be effective about a good fraction of the time in preventing killer diseases which may take time to incubate.  But I wouldn't play roulette, cuz who knows what can happen?

I plan on living til I grow old and look like an asian version of Yoda. No bareback for me unless the girl and I are in a serious long term relationship or trying to make babies together or both. lo

Whoever is either asking for it or doing it must not really appreciate their life.. Recent tests don't mean anything in fact diseases such as HIV can take months to show up and you can still get it.. Why play with your health when you can have so much fun being cautious and responsible about it?

-- Modified on 3/24/2014 11:19:27 PM

PS ladies would send links to some URL from a test clinic to show actual verifiable test results. The company mainly used at the time was a legit testing service that offered verifiable online results.  

At the time I was clueless and still new, and made the mistake of getting upset at the provider when I got a sore throat. I accused a provider for giving me something. I never had bbfs with her even though she offered it.

She then immediately sent me proof via a URL link to show that several tests over a period of time before and after she met me, showed that she's clean on full panel.   Being the skeptic that I am, I checked to make sure that it's a legitimate service with a legit URL from the said company.  They were a well known testing service. ( I got checked up too from my local clinic, it turns out I was clean too and it was just sore throat from acid reflux after too much drinking and hot sauce in my diet.)

Last I heard the said company got hacked and caused some drama. I'm not sure if they are still around though, maybe they changed their name and resurfaced but the damage the hack caused to their reputation might have been far too severe to survive, if I recall.  


-- Modified on 3/25/2014 12:08:13 AM

Dying is not the worst part. It's not a quick death. The suffering is horrible. Although the odd is not high, I really don't think it's worth the risk to seek out such service. Stay safe and have fun.

They are still around, different name now

Thank you everyone for your replies and input.  
I was curious to the question as I was trying to intertwine what goes on with providers and porn stars. If porn stars go BB for the scene, and some porn stars are providers, could the two become synonymous, and if so, is it common.  
So if there are concerns about false negatives, how does this reflect on the film industry?

Not sure about false positives, I'm guessing only a STD testing stat expert would know the true stats but I do know that many many PS are providers too. I've seen a handful.  Can't blame them though considering they can make similar or same or more seeing a client in the hobby as shooting a scene.  

Once upon a naive time I paid like 3k for a UTR PS that I really wanted to see.  Lol Glad I got that PS fantasy / curiosity out of my system though. Learned the expensive way that PS are about the same as other well reviewed indies and agency girls in terms of performance although you do definitely get to fulfill your PS fantasy. That could be a big thing for some guys.

Full disclosure: I am not a porn star. But I did recommend you Google false positives so I am replying.  The porn industry (the big guys/vivid etc) do routine screening (monthly for many). This will cut down risk compared to a random screen. False positive means,  VERY VERY VERY common for certain diseases to have a period where you may test negative today and are truly positive.  HIV and hepatitis can and often do give a false negative after exposure.  This can be googled (center for disease control website). Bottom line is bareback is a ridiculous risk (civvie as well).  To each his own but an hour of feeling good isn't worth that diagnosis. Be smart and if you want bareback find a monogamous girlfriend.

Men are asking for BBFS because they have never gotten Syphilis or HIV or Hepatitis or tuberculosis. Their experience shows them not to be concerned. What the chance of getting an STI is debatable, but some have to see it to believe it.