I'm asking because I had one denied because I didn't go into enough details, I listed the major positions, how it made me feel, etc. I enjoyed the provider, had a great time, but honestly I don't think I should have to go into graphic detail explaining all that happens. Now I'm suspect of other reviews I've read and wonder how much their embellished. Honestly, I don't video tape my sessions and when I'm in it I'm not taking mental notes of everything we do. I'm in the moment. I would think that is the important part of the review. It was good, I had a great time, I lost all sense of it being a paid service. Especially when I was looking for a GFE, not a PSE. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I misunderstand... But with the provider I reviewed It was mostly about the GFE, not the intercourse.

While I obviously do not know what you said in the review.
If it was 2 lines or even a short paragraph, we did this and that position and it was great, yes, it will be denied.

I've posted long and short reviews, but, it is best to add some detail.  
What she looked like, are the pics representative of her and accurate.
Did she rush you out the door and or was it an un-rushed session.
Did she "seem" (act) like she enjoyed her time with you.

I love GFE myself, I want it more than anything in my sessions, if she does not offer it, I do not see her.

No, I can't imaging TER wants you to exaggerate your experience, but, it does not have enough detail, others can not get an idea of what to expect if they call for an appointment

Use a few acronyms like BBBJ, DATY and such and it should go through. You don't have to be overly graphic about what happened, read some other reviews to get an idea what they want.  
Whether a review is accepted or not depends a lot on who is approving your review too, what's acceptable to one admin is to vague to another.

In the case of the review I did, it was pretty vanilla. That's what I wanted. There was no BBBJ, DATY, etc. A few positions. but it was mainly the quality of the experience, which was mostly the GFE, and I did put that in there. Maybe that's the problem. I wasn't looking for anything else then the social experience and that was what I got. I know I can't write a review if I didn't have intercourse, which sucks, because there are some great ladies out there that deserve the recognition for the service they provided.

reviews are denied because of not enough detail.  Be descriptive in what you write; use adjectives and adverbs to describe the environment, how she looked, how she acted with you, and especially her performance.  As has been stated earler, add some letters and you should be fine.

...He has a way of keeping it simple but getting them published.

Feel free to read mine I've never had any rejected. I also have one where intercourse didn't take place. BBBJ reviews are plentiful.

END OF MESSAGE

the FAQ page on reviews:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/info_policies/reviewFAQ.asp

Don't think I've ever had a review rejected, but I tend to go into how the session affected me, and along the way some details make an appearance

Who told you that?  As long as you met and spent time with her, you can review her.  To the best of my knowledge, the only time you can't write a review is if no session took place.

Read a few of my recent reviews, I don't use explicit language, I do use acronyms, so anyone reading it knows exactly what happened.

Swim

-- Modified on 12/5/2014 4:37:03 PM

I've had a couple rejected for lack of "details" There really wasn't more details than what I put in the review.