I have never been with a provider before and I was doing searches for Los Angeles. I saw a profile where the provider has 15 reviews, all positive, she is a porn star. I did a google search and saw pictures and videos and she is attractive. The charge is listed as 260 per hour. That seems low compared to what other girls charge, especially porn stars, and 15 reviews seems like a small number. Wouldn't she be in more demand? Could this be too good to be true? Why do some girls charge less than 300 per hour and others charge 500 and up?

Also, her website listed is a just a place to download porn. There is no mention of escort activities.

of her reviewers to get some vouching.  That should complement what you can read.

Because most guys don't review anyway.  But I do find it odd for a porn star to charge only $260/hr.  Most run more than $500 and many over $1,000/hr.  So, yes, it does sound TGTBT.

that is pretty low if she really is a 'pornstar'.  Just making a few videos does not make a girl a star.  I think the term pornstar is vastly over used.  Not every girl that ever appeared in a port video is a 'star'.

Inicky46 is right about the rates, most real pornstars will charge far more than $260 for an hour of their time.  I concur, it does sound TGTBT.

Swim