A month back, mostly for the fun of it I joined P411. I got a okay from every lady I have seen that is a member on that sight. I was just wondering if the okay's where like TER white list or if there is some kind of okay scale. I am mostly wondering how it works.
The owner of P411 is very adamant that OKs are REQUIRED unless there is a genuinely negative experience with a gent. Things that would rise to the level of not giving an OK would include: client used verifiably counterfeit currency, client physically abused provider (provable), client didn't pay at all (provable), client outed provider, etc. Essentially, whether a lady would choose to see the gent again or not is a moot point. Unless he was extremely unfit to hobby at any further point/with any other provider, he is supposed to receive a OK. This is why it is extremely important for ladies to verify the OKs a P411 gent receives and find out more info on how the date went. If the owner finds out a client was seen, but not OK'd, then all hell can break loose for the provider unless she meets a very stringent (client-centric) guideline.
TER whitelist is much more discretionary in regards to who receives one from whom. Personally, I will whitelist any gent I've seen whom I'd gladly see again... but that's just my standard for it.
Thanks, Edrienne. Since I use P411, I guess I can assume that there is usually some communication between the ladies when I am being verified? For you, is there a point, a number of okays, at which that communication is no longer needed? And does that also mean that TER whitlist referrals are speak better about the hobbyist?
Just curious, like to understand how it works and how people use it, particularly because I use P411 a lot.
Zig
I am not sure that there is any communication - perhaps there is, but the purpose of the OK is to eliminate the need for ladies to call up and verify things, and I have seen some provider require more OK's than others, and some who will not see a guy if his OK's are too old, so I think different providers use the OK's differently.
What I find interesting is looking at the providers who actually look at my profile vs. those that just request my ID, but never actually log into p411 to verify me. I feel more comfortable with a lady who is actually screening me.
At first that worried me, but now I am finding more and more ladies do not check my profile. I suspect they are checking my name and seeing that I have okays (I am up to 9) and see no reason to go any further. I discussed it with one lady and she said that between my email, and a brief phone conversation she had no concerns. In fact I pulled out my DL and said, "You want to see this, right?" and she laughed and replied, "No really, I know you are you."
Anyway, my guess is that the more okays you have, the less likely they are to check your profile.
I do like P411 for any number of reasons, but the main ones are how easy it is to see ladies who are coming to town, and to find ladies when I am traveling. If you just want to stick with local ladies, I can see where it would not have as much value.
Zig
For me, there is no number of OKs/WL that would negate my need to contact a handful of ladies personally. For others, there might be. See below for more...
I joined mostly to make the ladies screening me job easier. If the OKs are semi-compulsorily it makes the OKs not very useful. Looks like I waisted about $300 on that life time membership. I already automatically send my full real name and some reference so I am guessing that adding P411 info isn't going to add much. If it is compulsorily and if it is not leveled, why to the ladies use it at all? Thanks for explaining how it works.
Everyone screens differently so I wouldn't consider your $300 entirely wasted. If you were to send your full name and several ref's, I would still ask for full employment info - but not everyone does that. Many ladies use P411 as the extent of their screening, so if you are seeing one of them then it perfectly suits everyone's needs. I know I tend to screen more than most so bear that in mind....

I really should have did my homework first. I was hoping to make it easier to check my references with the rules as outlined, the okay's do not seem to be that much of a check of them. I wouldn't use such okay's as any more than a contact list as you do. I already provided the ladies I wanted to see with a list of references to check if they are so inclined. I provide any screening information a lady requests with in reason.
Oh well, it was only $300 and one lady does have a $50 discount that I want to see so it isn't a complete waste.
Thanks for the information, it was most interesting. I just wish I had it before I spent the money on joining.
...my experience is that P411 allows a provider to remove her OK simply for less than a rave review. Now, is it possible she lied to P411 and used one of the reasons you cite? I doubt that simply because I assume they might have checked with me to find out if any of these very serious offenses had happened. If P411 believed they had, I would have expected to be delisted, which I was not. In fact, my "offense" was to give her a 7/7 in a TER review. When it was posted, she asked me nicely to have it removed. I contacted TER Admin and ask that they do so. They refused. However, subsequently the review was "unapproved" as "unverified." This is only a guess, but I think she told both TER and P411 that the date had never taken place. Do I really care? No. She's a nice person but turned out to be not my type. I said lots of nice things about her in the review but apparantly she felt it dragged her scores down. From her point of view she's just trying to protect her business. I still have 4 "OKs" on P411 and Date-Check, plus a whitelist from one of NY's top providers so it's not a problem.
This is not quite true - I can think of one provider I saw and requested an OK, and it was never received. I emailed the provider and she claims she gave me one, but it was never posted. I pinged p411 and they said they would look into it, but I never got it and I am not aware of any fallback on the provider. However, I would not see her again.
Please understand that I have no control over how the rules are enforced. I only stated what the rules are to the best of my knowledge. I don't think I am violating any privacy issues by posting the below excerpt of P411's rules regarding OKs.... If I am, many apologies to the offended party and mod, please remove this post!
_____________________________
Your P411 account may be suspended for an indefinite period if:
* you decline to give Okays to client members who have not presented a real problem during your visit. (a real problem is not something you think could happen... ie: "he was fine with me, but could be a problem with someone else". Please save me the drama.)
* you fail to report a problem with a P411 member to staff immediately. (and making a report on a client, only AFTER he has posted a negative review of the session, makes you seem petty and vindictive. It also takes away from legitimate issues that need to be dealt with, and makes me very angry.)
* you make a false or exaggerated report on any client. (I'm serious about this one too, please seriously consider the repercussions of making a false report on a P411 client, I don't play games in this department)
As a Preferred411 provider, you are encouraged to do as much additional screening as is necessary to keep yourself safe. While P411 is an important tool to use in your screening process, we cannot make any guarantee on any of our members, be they client or provider. We are diligent, however, in screening all applicants thoroughly and do not want any problem clients or providers in our network.
_______________________________
Now, like I said, these are just the rules... I can't speak for the enforcement side of it. Also, regarding the "intent" of P411 OKs and the need for further screening (as in contacting the person who gave the OK to get more details about a gent, or asking a gent for more info about himself).... that issue is addressed above as well. The owner of the site never intended for it to be the penultimate screening tool whereby no other info (save the gent's ID) would be required.
As to whether OKs or Whitelists are more valuable - that would depend on the lady you asked! Speaking for myself, they are equally valuable... in that their only value is that I now have a starting place (accurate provider contact info) to ask questions regarding the gent. While OKs are near compulsory and therefore not a good indication of a gent's finer points, WL are so random and have no standard as to when/why someone gets them that they are also useless in and of themselves. But please understand, other ladies may have a different outlook on both and therefore may value one over the other, or value it's existence alone as sufficient for her screening needs.
Very useful to see the P411 rules, so thanks. It makes my experience (cited above) even more perplexing. I guess enforcement of the rules is either inconsistent the rules are bent on some occasions.
Very interesting. I had never seen the P411 rules regarding "Okays".
I have had the very same experience as others have stated. Had an "Okay" on P411 after having a pleasant meeting with a provider. Then I posted a review here. Apparently, it wasn't up to her preferred standards since she promptly asked me to change it and I politely explained why I thought it was a decent, honest review and that I felt uncomfortable changing it. An 8/7 should not be the end of any provider's life in my mind.
She promptly withdrew the "Okay." Hmmmmm.
...after a review that was not what the lady wanted (sad and shady on her part, IMO) then I'd definitely suggest contacting P411 with all the appropriate *facts* (unaltered email strings with IPs showing). In my limited experience with the owner, she has zero patience for shady/manipulative ladies - but she has to be presented with absolute proof. It does go both ways, though. I once had a dangerous client from P411 and while she required tons of proof of his unbalanced/indiscreet actions (which, luckily I had), she acted promptly and appropriately by rescinding his membership.
I often will mention that we train people how to treat us by what we allow them to get away with. It goes for both sides of this equation that if someone is a danger, or is merely shady, their actions should not be ignored or minimized. It only encourages further unscrupulous behavior from that person as well as from others who are told of how that person got away with behaving poorly.
Correct, but, as I said, I'm only guessing at the lady's motives and don't feel this is a big enough deal to pursue it with P411. I only aired it here to make the point that the system can be gamed at times.
It does not hurt to send p411 an email. I had a couple of ladies viewing my profile whom I had never contacted, and p411 took my emails very seriously - and they are very responsive.
As I made clear in an earlier post on this thread, the lady removed her OK of me on P411. That was my point in my first reponse to Edrienne, who believed providers were not able to do that.
I don't want to cause any trouble for the gal, who is nice and well-reviewed. Since I have four OKs on P411 anyway, it really doesn't matter.