Why Kerry Won the Debate

John Kerry staked out a strong plan to win the war on terror.
John Kerry showed us a new direction for success in Iraq.
John Kerry told the truth about Iraq.


Why Bush Lost the Debate

George Bush stubbornly refused to face reality.
George Bush failed to deliver a plan for Iraq.
George Bush refused to accept responsibility for his failures.

Please get out there and vote.Let's take control of this country with the right leader!

Dummy who depending on the way the wind blows so does his political views.  Just because he spoke very well does not abate his obvious stupidity.  He will say anything the people want to hear.  RE: The Diane Sawyer interview Question: What do you think about going to war. Answer: Well that depends on the outcome.  General Tommy Franks says Kerry would be a diaster.  I could go on but whats the use you die hard liberals will be wearing berkas if Kerry gets in.  Pick the Mosque you would like to attend!!
Just my views as I see it.

Peace out

-- Modified on 10/1/2004 7:26:50 AM

coming here soon.  DOOM & Gloom should Kerry gety in!!!

...who is bankrupting this country for this waste-of-time war in Iraq that has NOTHING to do with keeping us safe here.

Even by the politcal board standards buddym's post are subpar.

I mean what's the point?

fr

It's one thing to yank each other's chain a bit but I think that was over the line.

thirsty

-- Modified on 10/1/2004 2:58:23 PM

I must say you are right calling Kerry stupid was stupid. But I got carried away by some schmuck hiding behind an alias.  Thats what bothered me!!(the alias)

Santino,

I've already explained my position on off topic posts in the link below.

As I always tell those who complain about posts that I allow.

You have my permission not to read any post/thread that doesn't interest you.

thirsty

Kerry won the style vote hands down. He's an accomplished debater and has excellent tempo with his statements, etc. If the United States was bald, he'd make a hell of a hairpiece!

Of course, we're talking about judging leaders for the job of the President of the United States...not a Hollywood spokesman for 'Brand USA'. Regardless of how much television and slick presentation has become our new alter to the gods, images of suaveness still come in second when your judgements are (supposed to be) based on character, resolve, and leadership.

Despite all of the venier of assuredness, Kerry had NO GROUND to stand on when it came to sizing each man up for the most important leadership position on the planet. He's not steadfast, he's not resolute, he's not decisive, he's an appeaser rather than a go-getter. He's the choice of every foolhardy American who has pipe dreams of returning to the pre-9/11 days. He might even be able to pull off that charade, at least until we are hit again as a result of his wishy-washy (ie. nonexistant) policies on war & security.

The foundation of his theoretical ability to lead is based on fiction and propaganda. If the Dems get their wish and wheel this guy into office hoping that "increased global popularity" will somehow deliver us from evil, they have a hard wake up call ahead. True grit & character are not defined by how many people you can fool into believing you are great. The character of a country is forged by how it responds to its external environment in times of desperation. I fully expect Kerry to try and capitulate with the terrorists just as he would capitulate to France, Germany, and every other pier that we apparently need to confim our actions with whenever future strikes occur on US soil. That's the man's policy in black & white.

Prepare to take the hits and sit on your thumbs until the world council gives us a little leash.

Thank you Thirsty for getting rid of William Jefferson Clinton
alias post.

I don't know about you guys give me the smart guy every time