Don't you love to hook up with 18 year-olds who have one or two reviews no higher than 6 or 7?  Especially when the review indicates lack of experience, rather than cold professionalism?  They haven't cooked up a script yet that would get them reviewed at the 8 or 9 level.  That's where we come in, to teach them the fine art of pleasuring men.

Give me someone with the experience to know how to have a good time.  There's a reason that everyone who says "I wish I was 18 again" also says "... and knew what I know now".

....gets pleasured from a man (rather than a "two pump" boy). You could tell that she really notices the difference. Other than that, 18 to 21 is a bit too young. I'm paying for it so I want to have a good time too.

I don't want to teach when the $$$$$ is coming from my pocket.

men have their peaks in multiples of 8: 24,32, 40, 48...

so if a man at his 40 peak node intersects with a woman at her 32 peak node then the outcome is 40/32 if he is on top or 1.25
and 32/40 if he is on the bottom or .80, if they do it both ways the the average is (1.25+.80)/2 or 1.025. DFK will add the square root of this value to the total or 1.025+1.0124 = 2.0374 and if passionate greek is offered you add pi, or 3.14159 to this to obtain 5.1790, and once you've realized how much the session cost you you must subtract the square root of 5, 2.23606, from that to =2.92494 divided by the number of hours for the session, let's assume 2, = 1.46247, then multiplied by her looks score for the review section, so assume she's a 7,= 10.23 which is impossible as it would imply more than one lifetime so we must then divide that value by 1/100 of your systolic blood pressure, assume 140 w/o medication for a 50 year old male, so 10.23/1.4 will yield 7.307 which isn't fair to her because she tried hard so we'll credit her with 1.5 points for extra effort to get 8.807 which sounds about right.

I always knew math wasn't my strongest subject.  I got about two lines into this post and gave up  

-- Modified on 3/31/2005 2:40:17 PM

-- Modified on 3/31/2005 2:42:04 PM

oh ... the mass of the ass is a constant

You used the wrong value for pi.  It is 3.14286.  That changes the whole calculation.

Actually, I believe the value of Pi is 3.1415826, but I could be wrong.  Like I said, math was never my subject!!

the missing variable.

-- Modified on 3/31/2005 2:42:22 PM

-- Modified on 3/31/2005 2:42:57 PM

PI
3.
141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944
592307816406286208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647
093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559
644622948954930381964428810975665933446128475648233786783165
271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273
724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360
011330530548820466521384146951941511609433057270365759591953
092186117381932611793105118548074462379962749567351885752724
891227938183011949129833673362440656643086021394946395224737
190702179860943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132
000568127145263560827785771342757789609173637178721468440901
224953430146549585371050792279689258923542019956112129021960
864034418159813629774771309960518707211349999998372978049951
059731732816096318595024459455346908302642522308253344685035
261931188171010003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303
598253490428755468731159562863882353787593751957781857780532
171226806613001927876611195909216420198938095257201065485863
278865936153381827968230301952035301852968995773622599413891
249721775283479131515574857242454150695950829533116861727855
889075098381754637464939319255060400927701671139009848824012

and on and on . . . .

Didn't I just see you on the DC board?  Man! you get around!!

except on this board!!!