New York

The second review was tremendously different from the first.
King of all Threesomes 6430 reads
posted

There was no doggy in the first review, but there was doggy in the second.  Plus, the toy was different, as was the entire sequence of events.

I reviewed Iza and Shannon in November, 2004, and posted a review.  I saw them again in January, 2005, and posted a new review.  This was a brand new session, not a rewrite.  TER deleted the first review, giving a reason "review already posted."  Two private messages to TER insisting the second review was NOT a rewrite got one-sentence bureaucratic non-answers.  

I see paul2003zz reviewed Domino in February, 2003, then saw her again and reviewed her again in December, 2004.  TER didn't delete either of his Domino reviews.

The only way that TER will let you have 2 reviews of a provider is if the second review is different than the first. For example, if you saw a provider and she only offered the typical GFE session(ie DFK,DATY,BBBJ,CFS) and then you saw her again and she offered BBBJNQNS or Anal, they would let you keep both reviews up. You can always update your reviews, but if the acronymns stayed the same then your first review would get deleted and your second review would stay up. This is my understanding of how it works. Good Luck!

There was no doggy in the first review, but there was doggy in the second.  Plus, the toy was different, as was the entire sequence of events.

The review policy states that a second review will replace the first one, but I've noticed instances where a person has two reviews of the same lady.  I think the reviews have always been more than a year apart.  It's never been a big deal to me, but I've always wondered about that.

Register Now!