My policy has always been that if a woman has used her real photos that are truly representative of her body frame and hair style and color, then it's not her fault if I walk in and am disappointed with her face (assuming it was blurred).
However, if you are talking about ONLY using the terms "BBW" and "mature," that doesn't mean anything specific. A BBW could be a 5'6" woman who is 180 lbs. or 250 lbs. Big difference. And what does "mature" mean? 40? 50? 60?
Did she show pics or not? If those were the only things she used to describe herself, then she might very well be at fault, because those terms mean very, very little.
Why would a hobbyist book a meeting with an escort who does not misrepresent herself in any way, and then turn around and bash her in a review for the very same attributes that she doesn't hide? An escort advertises herself as Mature and lists her age, and puts herself in the BBW section so that any gent who comes to see her will know exactly what to expect and so that there won't be any unpleasant surprises waiting on the other side of the door. Said provider has only good reviews so far. Escort doesn't advertise that she is young or 110 lbs, so why be nasty because she is full figured and mature as is clearly stated? If not your type, why book in the first place? Just curious and wanting to avoid those kind of hobbyists in the future.
Hugs,
Bobbi
Hugs,
Bobbi
Another reason is the age advertised vs what you look like in reality, for example, if you are advertising 30 but look actually 35 its okay, but if your ad says 25 but look 40 well then there will be an issue.
And, lastly, (I know I will be stepping into a minefield here) ALL larger women advertise as BBW, as a matter of fact if you goto any dating site or provider profile, if a girl is heavy she will put "BBW" in her description, which always amuses me. Just because you are bigger and not hwp, does NOT make you a bbw! Lets break it down, first B=big (check), 2nd B=Beautiful (are you? be honest with yourself, do you turn heads? if you dont get a second look from a guy on the street you dont qualify the 2nd B) and the last ofcourse W=Woman, which def is important and hopefully true (lol)
What I am trying to say is, look and know your worth, compare yourself, I have seen some providers on this board who charge $500+, but I wouldn't give them a second look WITH their glorified pics, so I know in reality I will def not be seeing them so I don't get disappointed. Of course, he could also had been mislead by shillin' mongers, who loosely give out 8/9/10...to EVERYONE! I have been mislead myself, if they were accurate this wouldn't happen and you would not have gotten a bad review!
I think all providers should actually treat this biz as a "date" and give say 5 mins to a hobbyist for meet and greet to make up his mind. if he wants to stay or bail, this way there will be accurate reviews and everyone will be happy.
I think you missed the point I was asking about. I advertise my age and my weight. I don't make myself younger or skinnier. 5ft 2" and 140 lbs isn't exactly BBW, but I advertise that way so that the gents know I am not skinny and have some curves. If someone knows there is some weight and maturity and it's not their thing, why book in the first place? I don't believe in false advertising- it's a waste of time for the hobbyists and too much risk of disappointment. I can't speak for other escorts, but I would much rather a walk out than for the gent to stay and not be happy and to then write a bad review. There are plenty of gents who actually like mature and curvy, and those are the one's I am targeting. A gent who likes young spinners has no business contacting a mature, curvy escort.
-- Modified on 9/21/2012 2:50:20 PM
My policy has always been that if a woman has used her real photos that are truly representative of her body frame and hair style and color, then it's not her fault if I walk in and am disappointed with her face (assuming it was blurred).
However, if you are talking about ONLY using the terms "BBW" and "mature," that doesn't mean anything specific. A BBW could be a 5'6" woman who is 180 lbs. or 250 lbs. Big difference. And what does "mature" mean? 40? 50? 60?
Did she show pics or not? If those were the only things she used to describe herself, then she might very well be at fault, because those terms mean very, very little.
Events such as these are going to happen from time to time.
Yes bad reviews will affect you but a true hobbyist will look at your reviews and
toss out the best and worst and everything else is you. Don't allow one guy to ruin
your day. As a matter of fact if he couldnt discern who you were from your online
descriptions, than he wasn't for you, count your lucky star.
However, if you are talking about ONLY using the terms "BBW" and "mature," that doesn't mean anything specific. A BBW could be a 5'6" woman who is 180 lbs. or 250 lbs. Big difference. And what does "mature" mean? 40? 50? 60?
Did she show pics or not? If those were the only things she used to describe herself, then she might very well be at fault, because those terms mean very, very little.
I list my height, my weight and my age, in addition to saying I am full figured and curvy; and BBW just in case they don't understand what full figured and curvy means. I don't know what more to write to let a gent know what to expect. I blur and/or crop my face for privacy reasons, but try to show enough for the gents to get some idea. The "gentleman" who wrote the review stated that he doesn't like older, chubby escorts, but he chose just that when scheduling an appointment.
You referred to yourself as "said provider," so I had no idea you were talking about yourself. If I had known it was you, I would have looked at YOUR site and answered the question as directed to YOU.
You do show pictures, and if those pictures are representative of your body type and apperance NOW, then he has no leg to stand on, unless those pics did not exist at the time he booked. I'm only making that qualification because I had seen an escort who "updated" her ad on Cityvibe, and NO WAY was that even close to her body type. She was easily two dress sizes up, and appeared to be much shorter than the pics suggested. So even though she said those were "real" and "updated" pics, they weren't even close to the real thing. In that case, I had every right to write a bad review and point that out, but I didn't.
Assuming everything you posted was accurate...the reviewer has absolutely NO leg to stand on.
Next time, please make sure you are clear that you are referring to yourself, and I will check out all relevant information about you. Thanks.
.....because he's a douchebag and he knows he can be one unfortunately. I'll never understand either when you don't hide anything about you physically and make clear WYSIWYG but they go on and on about it and in a critical or mean way or worse they know what they see it's what they'll get but go on about how you're not their type but saw you anyways because your reviews are so good. I think it for some reason makes them feel better. Maybe he wanted to take you down a peg for w/e reason. Some people just truly enjoy being assholes.
Well said.... Truly Mocha...
I wouldn't immediately jump to the conclusion that he's a douchebag or an asshole. I would allow for the alternative (and kinder) possibility that he is simply an idiot.
.....for good measure let's call him all 3...... douchebag, asshole and idiot...in that order... okay? ![]()
Men should be discerning to make sure that their choices match their desires. You certainly make no pretentions about who you are and what you look like. Your photos are you! It hurts but hopefully you laugh it off with the knowledge that there are plenty of great reviews in your future and people will see this one for what it is.
-- Modified on 9/22/2012 1:21:10 PM