the problem with guys posting for credit is that there are guys who falsify reviews in order to get the credit, ..I hate when I read a review from a guy who has read my other reviews but hasn't really seen me...its immaterial if the review is good or not , it messes with MY credibilty...and I always know, i don't see enough guys to forget an encounter.
personally, I post reviews and problem reports for credit towards VIP. Who pays and who doesn't???
Like moleculo I don't review middle-of-the roaaders
that's why I seem to run mostly 7 to 10 in looks
and quality.
I started out with a VIP, but I have a lot of women I'd like to see this year, and no need to pay anymore with the amount of reviews I am "writing". However, I will return to pay status someday when I slow down a little.
-- Modified on 1/31/2005 10:38:26 AM
the problem with guys posting for credit is that there are guys who falsify reviews in order to get the credit, ..I hate when I read a review from a guy who has read my other reviews but hasn't really seen me...its immaterial if the review is good or not , it messes with MY credibilty...and I always know, i don't see enough guys to forget an encounter.
There are enough posters who will point out to TER staff phony reviews. Frankie2003a never posted a review and never paid, but always was VIP. He cruised every review and like a "tick" bird that eats the fleas off the hide of a hippopotamus, frankie pointed out the errors and omissions in every review. I, myself, have caught plagarized reviews of providers I have had sessions with and have just posted a correction notice to TER because a reviewer falsely said that a mutual friend of yours and mine was still at The French Lady's, when she had left months ago.
OK, now I'm really confused. I thought captyve's position was that anyone who doesn't write reviews is a wanker. Now he writes a heartfelt post about frankie2003, justly praising his service to the board. So is frankie a wanker, or not?
For the record, I'm a non-reviewer who recently broke his cherry with a review of Veronica Gianni.
Hey I pay. Unfortuantly I do not get to write reviews of you guys though. I would still pay if I could do that. I wouldn't want to come off like a shill..lol
I think paying has its advantages. I mean for me I get to post and chit chat thru pm with people, read other girls hot reviews (sorry guys I love women too), and read my own reviews.
Which I feel weird doing but it is fun. Expect like when someone says stuff that is untrue based on other reviewers stuff and falsifing their own review.
I have read so many reviews out of entertainment value, and it is high here, that I can point out a false review and I haven't seen any women from here.
Hey do you think I can? HUMMM that is a thought again.
What do you all think?
AngieRenee
XOXOXOXOXO
I prefer the paying route. I think that this site is great and would like to think that the pittance I pay help keep it healthy. Time to get off my ass and get that money order mailed.
I have no problem paying. I try to stay low key and rarely submit reviews, unless the provider had requested that I do so, or she was horrible, in which case I post one as a warning to other VIP's.
However, all of my reviews are honest and credible.
I used to mostly pay by money order but I found myself becoming too lazy to post reviews and what is this board without reviews? It's best if we do a little of both.
I started by reviewing, but now I pay and I don't like to review. That being said, I rely on reviews a lot. I thought about posting reviews only when I had an experience that was significantly inconsistent with the posted reviews for the sake of awareness. But that seemed somehow unfair to the providers and would leave me with a pattern of negative reviews - not where I want to be.
Hats off to those who post honest reviews. You have my gratitutde.