Re:Mona Lisa Models?

generally a very good org

there are reviews of the ladies from ML on TER..

a bit higher but typicaly worth it.

I have found them pretty solid.  girls change over
so some have reviews some do not.   They are honest and
do not "bait and switch"   The ladies look like their
photos.  The phone girls give good advice.   They havve
one half Brazilians, hot GFEs, other half American
more cute ones than most agencies.  Give a try, more
reliable than other "high end" agencies.  Charlie

Used them once, (saw Lissette) & the phone person (Eileen) was very friendly & helpful....Likely will use them again when I'm there next weekend...

As an out of towner who comes to NYC for business and to play, I like Mona Lisa as an agency.  They have always given me good service.  I like dealing with Eileen (three people work the phones, once you start with one of them I think you get the same person everytime).  She knows what I like, she is not afraid to have me try someone different every once in a while and that has worked out ok.  

I think they have a small group of girls who live in NYC and then deal with a lot of girls who come in for a week or two to work.  That is the impression I get from the fact that the girl I may want to see is not available and then allof a sudden they are.  That is why you have to look at the list below on the website of who is available.

Now, why so few reviews?  Well, I think the high end girls tend not to ask for reviews.  I think Mona Lisa has a fairly well established clientele base they deal with.  I think the reviewers tend to want to keep the  good ones to themselves.  I guess they don't need the VIP days that go with a review so why go through the hassle.  I know of at least two girls I have seen who I have not reviewed because the base info on the original review was inaccurate and I am too lazy to go through the hassle of trying to change it.  Plus as per a previous thread, sometimes I get more of what I want from TER in the discussion groups rather than the reviews because just like the girls with the reviews YMMV.

A lot of the girls work for more than one agency and although they may be under a different name and have a different picture, they are easy to spot(different pictur bu exact same unique costume) (try CharlesAngelsNYC or NY elites).  They are supposedly independent of each other and I believe that.  I just think the girls want to maximize their exposure while they are in town.
Again the easiest thing to do is look for the guys doing the reviews and then click on the envelope next to their  name and see if they will talk to you backchannel.
Or contact the agency, get credentialled and go from there.

OK, waiting for the response to tell me to go back where I came from LOL
my .02

For my taste, Mona Lisa girls are way too tall, way too expensive.  For $600-750, I wanna be the star of a Vivid Video movie, with a major Porn Star.  With Mona Lisa, for this price, you get some skinny, towering, spoiled runway model instead.  Not my taste.

They are hit or miss.  I've used their service twice.  Once the girl was as advertised.  The second was at best a $200-250 experience that cost me $600.  The last time I called they had a model for $600.  I called back, saying I wanted to see her, but the woman who answered said she would be $1,000.  I reminded her that the model was 400 cheaper 15 minutes earlier.  She said she would do it for 600, but by then I was put off so I passed.

I have had close to 99 % succesex rate with their
models.  Meaning, never a bait and switch, true
pictures, true descriptions.  I'll match their
talent up against the thousanddollar agencies which
I've used then call myself stupid and return
to monalisa.  Every one of the phone girls is a
true matchmaker, in my matchbook.      P.