New York

Re:An objective view on this-my two cents
bosco42 57 Reviews 3976 reads
posted
1 / 12

This provider is a total ripoff. She used to go by the name Giselle. Avoid and save your time and money.

And your point is 3181 reads
posted
2 / 12

But we need more details. Maybe an event like a review or meeting?

TalkisCheap 3664 reads
posted
3 / 12
newyorkjewels 3798 reads
posted
5 / 12

I just deleted my first post. It didnt belong here. However, I will say that your review of Samantha is not accurate. Alyssa



-- Modified on 8/21/2004 4:38:10 PM

bosco42 57 Reviews 4824 reads
posted
6 / 12
Clean my Plumbing 2841 reads
posted
7 / 12
newyorkjewels 3135 reads
posted
8 / 12

Samantha is not anywhere near a in appearence 5 but more like a 10.
Most of that review is not true. She does not have a hygiene problem. It was her performance you were not pleased with.
Please tell me this, if you dont like our girls, WHY DO YOU STILL CALL?  Alyssa

-- Modified on 8/22/2004 7:54:26 AM

bosco42 57 Reviews 2509 reads
posted
9 / 12

It seems very odd to me that you would jump in on a post that has nothing to do with you or your agency and interject whatever grudge or hard feelings you have. Number one being a mature adult I will not discuss YOUR problem publicly as it will only create hard feelings (which you apparently already harbor). Number two my reviews of both Samantha and Alicia Leigh are very accurate in my opinion even though you might not approve of it for obvious reasons. The reviews I write are meant to be truthful and helpful to other readers . Their purpose is not to brown nose you or any other agency so as to win your favor. Maybe some of your other clients do this but that is not the purpose of a review. Remember you "highly recommended" Alicia Leigh and you got rid of her the next day. You also told me you were going to get rid of Samantha but then apparently had a change of heart. I do not harbor any hard feelings as you probably had good intentions when recommending these girls and unfortunately you didn't know them as well as you should have. I think you are a nice and well meaning person and wish you luck and peace.

newyorkjewels 3552 reads
posted
10 / 12

Yes, I was angry when i read the review. I did let Sam go shortly after but took her back after we decided to lower her rate since she is not a total GFE. She has many repeat clients that were asking for her.
I didnt think she deserved that review, because I dont think it's all true. Yes, some complained about her non GFE service, and that is why we lowered her rate. Noone else has ever complained about her hygiene and I dont believe that. In fact, I started checking her after you said this nonsense. If you dont like someone fine, but you dont have exagerate to ruin her repuatation.
And no, I dont have clients dont post reviews in our favor. If someone is not good, they dont stay with us. If our regulars arent happy I let them go usually the first day. I wont keep someone on if they do not get repeat requests and Sam has been getting several.

As for Ashley, yes she was a huge mistake. That is why she lasted only a few hours. And because she was highly recommended to me and claimed to be a GFE, I did tell people that the day she worked. I was wrong and I will never do that again. I have two people who see girls their first day so I do not waste anyones time. They are friends but they are also particular clients who give me accuarate feedback.
As for Samantha, she is very good for a girl who is new to this. I am only referring her to people I am sure will like her and I tell them that she is not a True GFE.
Bosco, what bothers me is that you said she has a hygiene problem and we both know that is not true. I feel you went out of your way to hurt her reputation by putting that untruth in your review.  
You also were not honest about her appearence. She is not a 5. It seems when youre not happy with a girls service you will tear them apart in every way. If you didnt like her service, I understand and would have made it up to you, but not for what you were asking.

IVE ATTACHED ANOTHER PIC OF SAMANTHA. IF SHE IS A 5, I WOULD SAY YOUR REVIEW MAYBE IS ACCURATE. BUT THIS GIRL IS A 10.

Bosco, it's not easy for me to even write this post, because I like you. I think youre a hell of a nice guy, but I cant understand why you did this.  However, that review is really harsh and I dont believe it's 100% true.

                                 Peace, Alyssa

-- Modified on 8/23/2004 6:08:17 AM

BDJ4ME 23 Reviews 3420 reads
posted
11 / 12
bosco42 57 Reviews 2678 reads
posted
12 / 12

I do not wish to prolong this disagreement any longer than is necessary, but I can honestly state that on the day that I saw Samantha that was an honest evaluation. In the pictures one only gets to see her body and not her face which also enters into the equation. On the day in question she was not wearing any makeup, her hair was uncombed, she was not freshly showered and she had an overall very unkempt appearance. I am not looking to hurt anyone's reputation but I have to call it like I see it.
Alyssa, I am certain that under your expert guidance on fashion, makeup and how to present oneself as a lady that she will improve to meet your standards. Unfortunately, that was not the case on that particular day.

Register Now!