New York

New Rule
needitbad2020 16 Reviews 192 reads
posted

Instead of banning reviews that talk about BBFS let's ban discussion threads with innuendo, unverified information, or discussions about women without discussing their name.

Gentlemen:

I just went to read the review in question, the fact that the reviewer has no other reviews and uses initials as his monicker begs the question, is this a real review or is someone trying to get even with a provider for whatever reason they have?
Just a question we should ask......

For god's sake, do I have to search thousands of reviews to know who to AVOID. Can someone clue me at least with her race to narrow down my search. Thanks

I sent u a PM with the info you asked for.

I am a very bad girl...I realized I like texting my limits and basically  when one of my client requested  an off limit PSE sessions we had great chemistry and its just happened...we lost our barriers...it felt awesome ...as  i said i am a  very bad girl ...

Posted By: nyc1970
Pm me as well plz.

Yes isabela offered bb anal is in her extreme pse menu.and she begged me to do her bare not only in her pUsy but ass. Besides gina she is the most extreme provider in ny

Pls send me that PM --  

Thanks!

Very confused.  PM appreciated as to whom we are talking about

She can at least attempt to have it removed.  I tried to have my latest review removed for too much personal information, the reviewer tried to have to removed, now I'm stuck with it!  

Can you post the reviewer or a link to the review?  

Xx

Do a search of her name and read post from 5/25/12. Also, recent review by atal21735 among many others shows that she clearly takes more risks than most. Personally, I'm not surprised at all to hear this. I'm just more surprised at the surprise. Not judging, but read the writing on the wall here.

24824666 reads

provider in question is known for bareback.

Posted By: pierced.sailor
Do a search of her name and read post from 5/25/12. Also, recent review by atal21735 among many others shows that she clearly takes more risks than most. Personally, I'm not surprised at all to hear this. I'm just more surprised at the surprise. Not judging, but read the writing on the wall here.

Can you send me a PM with the provider's name?  Thanks.

I did a few searches and figured it out. This is hardly the first conversation that has suggested she does BBFS. So why is this discussion on here yet again?



-- Modified on 7/9/2013 12:57:23 PM

barewitness682 reads

the risk of transmitting HIV from woman to man is very very minimal (most common is from man to man). And if hypothetically if a woman is HIV pos, on meds and viral load is undetectable transmitting HIV is almost impossible. Still I dont get why reviews like these are removed because it serves as both a warning to hobbyists who play it safe  to avoid such a provider and an option for hobbyists who wouldnt mind taking the risks. this behavior happens all the time so why not let everyone know

Instead of banning reviews that talk about BBFS let's ban discussion threads with innuendo, unverified information, or discussions about women without discussing their name.

Register Now!