Two recently reviewed providers -- Mimi Mynx and Natalie --have only ONE review, but in each case they have the TER seal of approval on their websites, seemingly almost before the review even appeared. And in the case of Natalie, she's briliantly reviewed by  a guy for whom she's his first and only review and she requests a donation of $225 on her website (he says 250). Am I wrong to think caveat emptor? (BTW, I'm not impugning brother member anataben, who reviewed Mimi, just the practice of using the TER logo so, you should excuse the expression, promiscuously...)

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=80863

-- Modified on 8/12/2006 8:12:49 AM

-- Modified on 8/12/2006 8:18:23 AM

I never trust a first time reviewer. In time the provider will get more reviews from members who have reviewed other ladies. Wait to see what they have to say.

FYI - A provider/agency submits their site for inclusion in the TER Site Reviews section in order to obtain the TER logo link. They do not have to be in the TER review database first. The logo link has nothing to do with the review database.

thirsty

it was like a "Good Housekeeping" Seal of Approval, you'd be eligible for a refund for poor service from TER. Fat chance!!

Thanks, Thirty, for the explanation!

I can completely understand your concern but I was instructed to "apply" for approval and place the seal on my website before I would be allowed to make any posts.  I had to post first in order to advertise and request a visit from a reviewer.  Kind of a catch 22 I understand but that is what happened.

I hope this clears things up!  If you have any other comments or concerns about me or my service, I'd be happy to help!