In the past month, three bogus reviews of the legendary and, sadly, dearly-departed Diana from Mona Lisa have been posted, presumably by losers looking to get free VIP access without either paying or posting real reviews. I have filed problem reports on all three (seentheworld, fornick8r and sweepy), but the reviews remain.

What's up with this? Nobody likes freeloaders, but more importantly, I thought the integrity of the reviews was the bedrock of this site. Does TER have an explanation for this disturbing practice?

Confused and pissed,

mo

i don't think there's any way around this. i've seen posts that ring hallow, or are flat out lies about providers i know. you can only hope they trip up. maybe, though, TER carries a bigger load than we know.

TER continues to allow reviews that are pretty much cut & paste from legit reviews or reviews with barely 2-3 lines of useless info. Now when you read a review you have to check the reviewers other reviews to see if they're legit or not.

easily half of their reviews are laughably obvious, with the author displaying a penchant for the letter "k" in place of the letter "c"... i.e. "I kummed", "I kame", as well as an overuse of the verb *to splooge*, meaning, we assume, to experience an orgasm. He requires us to understand that his sexual equipment is impressive indeed, and that no orifice is denied his irresistible prowess. Whoever he (?) is, he doesn't realize that he is an unintentional humorist, not an obscure pornographic genius.

F Mona Lisa. I wouldn't pay $600 for those broads. The girls at BDJ are much better for 1/2 the price. CC

dearly departed? she didn't go the way of the dodo, right?

Just wondering.

They get points for good selling technique. An impression is created that there women are easily worth what they ask. You should be so fortunate that they will accept your humble money.
The most I've ever paid is two thirds of their entry level rate, and that's only because I love the woman. At ten dollars a minute you tend to focus on money, not sex. What makes it worth all that green ?

She hasn't worked since December 10 and noone has heard from hear since December 13.

You can tell which reviews from Mona Lisa are fake:  those authored by JKelly, SThoreau, etc.  Mia also sometimes posts pics that are not real, and are sometimes even inaccurate.  

That said, I have always had a great time using the service, and I have trusted Mia to pick companions just by telling her what I am looking for.  She even e-mails me pics sometimes that I know are accurate, and many of the pics on the site ar real pics of the girls.  

An no, I am not a shill, and I could care less about Mona Lisa.  It's just my $.02

$600 is way too much, though I have done it more times than I prefer to add up.  The entire market in NYC is slanted; just look at other eros sites, such as Las Vegas or Florida,  You can get high quality girls for $300 that would fetch $600-$1000 in NYC.

In case you haven't noticed, times are tough for a lot of people. I promise you there's not nearly as much of a demand for these "ladies" (I've been asked to "play nice") at $600 a pop than there may have been a few years ago. It's time for these people to come back to earth. CC

Agency has been honest with me and been with several of their women. Quality level is high. Always had a great experience but I've seen some questionable reviews. One was posted before the escort was booked for the first time! Agency wouldn't recommend her to me until she was booked at least once so they could have a good idea of her "in session", rules, etc. Don't believe agency responsible for bogus reviews. Generally, consensus of reviews have met exactly what I encountered with their women.

I have been with two of mona lisa's models and I was impressed by the quality of the agency service and the girls.  Coming from out of state the prices seem reasonable compared to other areas of the country but I admit I don't know NYC prices.

Where Did all of the mona lisa reviews got to.  They look like they got pulled off the website.