I am asking everyone this question to get their  opinion ,
Eros is not what it used to be, I feel lately more and more fake ads are going up with bogos pictures and worst multiple ads from the same phone #.
With google making easier for both clients and providers to do some basic research why doest Eros screen their ads to filter fakes out and restore some their respectability.

Eros has a monopoly on escort malls in many urban areas, NYC being one of them. Because they're seen as the only (relatively) upscale option in the area, they're able to charge exorbitant prices. I spend as much money on Eros each month as I do rent, FFS! They're making a LOT of money off of the fake ads; why would they get rid of them? They're thinking "now" rather than big picture, perhaps not realizing that the insurgence of B&S and shoddy providers is slowly ruining their image and cutting down on clientele.  

It's in their best interest to have quantity over quality. I would rather post on BP for $17 perhaps 4-8 times a month than to go with a seemingly "higher end" platform that doesn't even vet their own content. If they're not going to vet it then why do they deserve the amount they're asking for.  

AoS is a niche, obviously, but quickly proving itself as a quality showcase of submissive and switch BDSM providers. I'd like to hear of other reputable advertising platforms, if anyone knows any... I am fed up with Eros, as I know many other ladies are!

By far, the only place where the pictures are real, highly selective and user friendly.. I have gotten amazing extended engagements from it and I keep hearing the same from other companions and gentlemen who enjoy the exciting content updated daily.

Unless you can successfully cross-check against reviews here or maybe elsewhere, it's TOFTT.  Caveat emptor...

yes, the owners of the site, would accept girls without what is considered 'Pro' shots back then. I didn't find them, they found me as I was essentially 'recruited', if you will. Also, a high 'rating' wasn't part of the score either to be a part of the community. I didn't even have one nor knew what TER even was back then as I was just introduced to the world.  

I appreciate any platform that has a clear focus and works to maintain it, securely by not accepting everyone, and to a certain extent moderating it.

mind as well.  

virtually every advertising venue. They will certainly not take responsibility for the actions/deceptions/misrepresentations of their advertisers.  

About a year ago when I first started putting my ad on EROS I was getting 3-4 calls a day no shock came to the fact I was the girl in the photos and everything was a go recently I noticed fake ads go up and please take note there are "4 0 0" "6 0 0" and they post in "midtown east" or "midtown e" I called eros and they sounded as if I disrespected them and said if I have problem file a complaint with the DMCA which I never EVER got a response too.  

I think I knew that. Lol.

Posted By: TaylorSteele

yes, the owners of the site, would accept girls without what is considered 'Pro' shots back then. I didn't find them, they found me as I was essentially 'recruited', if you will. Also, a high 'rating' wasn't part of the score either to be a part of the community. I didn't even have one nor knew what TER even was back then as I was just introduced to the world.  
   
 Now, as with all things, it has grown and without what is to be considered 'professionally shot photos' that look a certain way, unfortunately a gal won't be considered even if her rating is where it 'needs' to be. The looks have to be consistent, which on a platform, I'm sure you understand is what keeps it cohesive. I just don't agree with the overall 'approval' process but in the same breath, I do understand it.  
   
 While of course it is a beautiful showcase of some of the top gals here in this world, it's what I call a 'pretty' site, with decent marketing for the most part, somewhat decent site design although a bit still too verbose overall and a lil too clicky in that you veer off too much to different links and not taken back. Being here over a year now it's interesting to see things progress, grow, for the most part as long as it's in a positive direction. There's one thing to be said about being truly 'independent' but also being part of a 'social' network, a 'club'. I guess whatever works for each girl here.  
   
 In any event, I'd still call it one of the 'better' sites for those ladies looking to advertise and spend their hard earned money. For that, yes, I am giving you kudos GLS, that they have no competition. Now, if they had a smarter brain, they should consider a 'sister' site to those gals who are what is considered a tier perhaps 'under' the other and don't make the 'top' tier cut. Just a thought .....but then again then it would just be about $$ and just someone's perception of who makes that final decision of who is a 'top' girl and who is not here, wrapped up in a pretty package. God knows there is enough judgement passed here in this world on a daily basis as it is.  
   
 I only responded, because I was actually shocked you of all gals here would want to be a part of that. I thought that was everything you were against in all honesty. But you are right, the sites seem to be getting thinner and thinner here, not sure why. The platforms are few and far between. It is what it is.  
   
 Why don't you start one...

-- Modified on 4/2/2014 4:45:39 AM