95% of the models listed are bait and switch. Had an appt. once with Helen (who might not still be on the site), who was supposed to be a striking 5'6" 107 lb hottie brunette, and who the phone girl recommended when I asked for one of their best girls. She turned out to be a 5' 11" 145 lb homely european girl. What a waste of time: and for those prices!
I've had great (but a bit pricey) luck with enchante escorts, and a good experience with one of american beauties vip ($$$$$$) girls.
I kind of knew it was too good to be true...I'm checking out the two places you mentioned. The other two that have caught my eye are: www.chezbrigitte.com and www.fleurdeelite.com, any positive comments?
If you haven't realized chezbrigitte, fleur de elite, nycovergirls, and elitemodels.net are all the same company. I learned the hardway. Not only are they not models, but Elizabeth/Michelle/Carol or whatever her name is now, used to work for an inhouse which shall remain nameless for $200 per hour. So basically she's been through the ringer. They gave her the Pretty Woman treatment and abracadabra $1500 per hour. You would do better with a regular agency & paying 1/2 the cost.
Are all these agencies allied? Are they one and the same?
I do not know nor can I verify or deny kingstrong's assertion but I can say that I have been watching fleur and chez for a short while. Let me also state that I am not connected nor have I used the services of any these ladies/agencies so I write from a third person perspective.
I become interested in fleur and chez in a sociological context. It appeared to me that the 'high end' of the escort market was hidden from view so I started to look on the internet to see if anyone was making themselves visible. I was interested in how and what would be taking part and how much. Furthermore I took up a one month subscription to Captain69.co.uk to see the reviews on 'providers'. The reviews are fascinating particularly the men who spent 1000's on women who then cannot bear the sight of them.
I can confirm that women do move / are listed on differing agencies. Elizabeth/Andrea/Andi fleur /chez /elite
This lady is listed as a londoner on all three sites. She has since been delisted from fleur.
Elena/Elena chez /elite She is listed in her chez biography as a czech model who is 5,2' tall. chez news claims she is dutch. I emailed chez and asked " Is she dutch, czech or a fan of europe in general?" I was told : " she's dutch, lives in Rotterdam, her rates are $1,200 an hour". Elite lists her height as 5,0'. Certainly some discrepancy.
Sophia/Sophia fleur /chez She was listed as a russian gymnast on fleur yet the bio on chez does not suggest this but notes her 'athletic interests'
In fairness to any negative suggestion she was given a positive review on captain69. I did not see any reviews of the other women listed so I cannot comment.
I can also say that some of the women on fleur appear on monalisamodels.com (?) or is it monalisa.com (?) i.e. Marlena on fleur is shown as Ingrid on the other.
I suspect that anyone wishing to deal with these agencies has a very large disposable and the 1000's they spend are a small % of there overall income. It is a mind game and if the client is prepared to pay 1000 rather than 200 that is the power of marketing.
Two things do strike as amusing about the high end websites: 1) chez has wallpaper on some of the ladies individual pages, pray tell who would decorate their computer with such a permanent image? 2) the personal comments on american beauties. Turn ons and Turn offs, particularly turn offs - smelly ugly men who are boring. That's honesty, thats telling it like it is.
Two things that strike me as sad about the high end websites: 1) the bio comments that suggest the women is after romance when presumably what the man wants to know is when and how often he have sex in any way he feels like. 2) the aspiring actresses who just want to make a little money on the side while waiting for their big break. Are they for real? surely they must realise that presence on these sites could easily cripple any chance of stardom. This is would prime grade A fodder for the tabloids, they wouldn't even have to make it up.
I don't even have to venture to guess to say this.
No matter where you are, Europe, South America, North America, the netherlands, you name it, 99% of the provider pics you see on the net, or in the papers are fake.
Hundreds are lifted from famous models in other countries and pasted in to agency sites. Even independent sites.
Hundreds of them are just shots of cropped beautiful bodies.
There must be a generic "bulging breasts-beautiful butts-doggiestyle pose, standing-against wall in boots with back to you pose, orgasmic face pose, oh and the cousin it hair over face pose, stock photography book.
So much fraud. So little time.
It's too bad for the genuine 1% of women who are beautiful providers, with "RECENT" pics, who actually do the providing.
I've been lucky enough to come across a few of the 1%, namely Ana from eros-ny, shauna from Miami, NYC.
Could everyone who's come across this 1% of women i call "the genuines" add more names to this post?
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
