It was very clear in the complaint that the person said "hello Kim". Never mentioned a tryst, details, or anything like that, just said hello.
If a provider would see a person with a family surrounding them and said hello, the gentlemen just explains it waway as a person who works in his cmpany etc or a salesperson who made a biz call.
The provider Kim complains that she blurs her face and that is enough. When one posts their website with pics and has unsual and unique tats that can easily identify the person their is no cover to hide under.
If the person wants to be under cover then they need to be UTR completely, no webiste no pics just word of mouth rederrals.
Its the nature of the beast.
I have had provid4ers say hello outside of the tryst and they all just say hello via name, actual name, suchg as the provider said, as Kim. The provider would know a persons real name if they need referrals and cks a person biz directory as most now do.
With the hobby comes risks and when you are on the receipt side of the biz collecting the cash, you have more risks and no reason to complain.
Posted By: A`
Let's turn the tables and take a look at two different scenarios:
You make an appointment, you are screened, you pay the girl, you have your session, you two part ways.....three weeks later:
The provider happens to see you and your wife and your children in the grocery store.
According to you it is perfectly fine for the provider to waltz up to you and your family, address you as "Whitelightening"....and start a conversation about your hobby habits.....bc hey you paid her!
Or
You are at your place of employment and the provider you saw last walks in and starts talking about the nasty tryst you had with her.
According to you..bc of an envelop...there should be no discretion expected in the hobby? That is not the way this works.....and if you really have invested any time into your logic you may not be as evolved as a hobbyist as you think. Your logic lacks wisdom, your reasoning behind your logic is very immature.
This has nothing to do with what Tatt was paid, it has everything to do with common sense. What happened to her is not acceptable, and your logic and the lack thereof is even less acceptable.