: Minnesota Discussion : You are correct, sir! I've seen many of them too. -EOM-

seymorbutts5 28 Reviews 3322 reads

posted 9 years ago

1 / 33

Frankie info

http://minneapolis.backpage.com/BodyRubs/thursday-is-two-pops-for-the-price-of-one-day/15435316

loveyourtouch 832 reads

posted 9 years ago

2 / 33

What about it? All you did was post a BP ad here. Big deal.

I've seen her a few times at two different places under 2 different names. There are better and more reliable out there.

seymorbutts5 28 Reviews 1026 reads

posted 9 years ago

3 / 33

Re: What about it? All you did was post a BP ad here. Big deal.

I was implying she has no reviews and was looking to see if anyone could provide more info.

Rxyman 92 Reviews 802 reads

posted 9 years ago

4 / 33

Thank goodness for creativefunguy taking one for the team.

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=309458

mnborn80 141 Reviews 732 reads

posted 9 years ago

5 / 33

Re: Thank goodness for creativefunguy taking one for the team.

He sure seems to have a better time than most people when seeing massage girls...

loveyourtouch 708 reads

posted 9 years ago

6 / 33

Hate to break the news, but....

I saw her a number of weeks ago. CFG's review, as many of his other reviews, is simply not accurate- IMO, and CFG's reviews are suspect to me. While she is a nice girl, the pics are NOT accurate. She is flabby in the tummy and has marks from bearing kids and her behind is nowhere near as firm as those pics would have you believe. Furthermore she has lots of ink. My session was maybe a solid 6 at best. She's worth a visit. Not saying don't see her. Just go in knowing what you'll see.

So don't just look at one person's review. Look at the other girls he has reviewed and compare his ratings with yours. Wish I could see nothing but 8s and 9s...... 'nuff said.

loveyourtouch 608 reads

posted 9 years ago

7 / 33

Re: What about it? All you did was post a BP ad here. Big deal.

OK... wasn't sure. I submitted a reply to Rxyman's post that should answer your questions. But I've seen her. Haven't repeated and likely won't. Nice girl. Lots of ink. Sort of rushed. She's not a 9 as CFG indicates. Not on a scale of 1 to 10, anyway.

loveyourtouch 655 reads

posted 9 years ago

8 / 33

Your comment is SPOT ON.... Couldn't agree more, and....

...I have started to write more about CFG and others. NO WAY IN HELL are all those girls 8s or 9s, and NO WAY IN HELL are all their sessions so great. Period. Thanks for speaking up!

And did you notice the timing of the review stating he got 2 pops? Came the day after she advertised 2-pop Thursday (or something to that effect)

TalonTed 91 Reviews 785 reads

posted 9 years ago

9 / 33

creativefunguy is bodyrub pimping to fool you

I've seen a few of his 8/9, to me they are all 5/6/7. He's marketing $$ from these girls for sure.

loveyourtouch 666 reads

posted 9 years ago

10 / 33

You are correct, sir! I've seen many of them too. -EOM-

END OF MESSAGE

SeductiveConcierge See my TER Reviews 682 reads

posted 9 years ago

11 / 33

Re: Thank goodness for creativefunguy taking one for the team.

Guys beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One guys 10 is another guys 2

loveyourtouch 518 reads

posted 9 years ago

12 / 33

Of course what you wrote is true, but....

... apparently anything that wears a skirt (or short shorts) is an 8, 9. or 10 to at least one person. There is no objectivity there and we can see that. I've seen a good number of those girls, and I am pretty sure they are not all 8, 9, or 10, and their sessions are not all 7s or 8s.

vorlon 119 Reviews 599 reads

posted 9 years ago

13 / 33

He looks suspicious to me

1) His scores are almost always as good a score as the provider has gotten
2) Often he is the only review or one of the very first reviews for a given provider
3) None of these providers has given him a whitelist
4) Little board activity and none for quite some time

It's enough to make me wonder if there is a real hobbyist behind the account.

loveyourtouch 585 reads

posted 9 years ago

14 / 33

And that account is but one of about 4-5 that I wonder about. -E-

END OF MESSAGE

LChayse See my TER Reviews 574 reads

posted 9 years ago

15 / 33

Do Loreli & Frankie have the same scheduler? (eom)

END OF MESSAGE

LChayse See my TER Reviews 636 reads

posted 9 years ago

16 / 33

I was going to challenge you guys to show some facts but.....

A second review came up today for her. Notice any similarities?

So disappointing. "Sigh"

loveyourtouch 737 reads

posted 9 years ago

17 / 33

Same syndicate, and.....

...amazingly, the old Lorelei reviews have vanished. The ones that indicated she was DIY..... Not sure what her menu is now, but I KNOW FOR A FACT that she had reviews from the past.... could be her menu has opened up and a new, fresh start, but I cannot state as fact or give an opinion since I have not seen her since her "return."

Pimpernel 617 reads

posted 9 years ago

18 / 33

Even a broken watch . . .

is correct twice a day. That is such an insightful post by a guy who consistently ranks a couple points lower than other well known reviewers, brags about it and calls women ho's.

seymorbutts5 28 Reviews 594 reads

posted 9 years ago

19 / 33

Thanks for the info!

I'm slowly switching to low volume high quality experiences.

creativefunguy 60 Reviews 661 reads

posted 9 years ago

20 / 33

Re: Thanks for the info!

Well, I am not sure what some of you are proposing however, it is true I am a glass is half full guy! And I tend to like to create friendly relationships with the women I see. Yes, I see them as women, people, not what some of you are referring to them as property or worse. In addition, I have only one TER acct. If I am not mistaken TER won't allow you to have two. All of this does make me laugh, so much gossip and drama on this site it is a crack up.

I stand by the reviews I write, they are accurate to me and are my take, but then again, I think life is pretty great, so there you have it

Drumsticks 90 Reviews 705 reads

posted 9 years ago

21 / 33

A toast to the misfits...

... may you live long in your land, prosper and propagate !!

BTW, have you chosen not to have your White Lists displayed or do you have none, so far

vorlon 119 Reviews 666 reads

posted 9 years ago

22 / 33

I've seen that pattern before as well

Multiple accounts reviewing the same set of providers; usually their earliest reviews and better than what others give.

There have even been websites openly advertising review writing services.

cameltoelover 569 reads

posted 9 years ago

23 / 33

Re: I was going to challenge you guys to show some facts but.....

Posted By: LChayse

A second review came up today for her. Notice any similarities?

So disappointing. "Sigh"

Either disappointing, plagiarism or the same person managing multiple review accounts.

Aliasforu 558 reads

posted 9 years ago

24 / 33

Isn't this her? eom

END OF MESSAGE

loveyourtouch 676 reads

posted 9 years ago

25 / 33

He could just white list himself from the multiple accounts....

you know... multiple devices at various locations... and, of course the assistants and friends

knotsaway 38 Reviews 542 reads

posted 9 years ago

26 / 33

That you have plunged into this pool is just another indication...

... of the depths to which this board has sunk.

1) Some people are "low graders." Some are "high graders." Some are in between. And not only are their different philosophies on reviewing providers, there's also different approaches to seeing providers. I believe that a lot of what happens with a provider depends on the client's attitude. I know some reviewers who habitually score providers much lower than their typical score. But I never here any conspiracy theories about them. How do you know they're not targeting The Competition? No, it's only the High Scorers who are fudging reviews, eh?

2) Some guys like TOFTTing. Not something I tend to do, but I appreciate that someone did it, or no providers would have any reviews.

3) There's several reasons for no white lists, besides reviews being fake. Some providers don't know anything about white listing. Some don't give white lists, to anyone. Some reviewers don't ask for white lists. And some (like me) have white lists but choose to not display them unless they're needed for screening.

4) This particular reviewer had quite a bit of board activity in the past. Quite a few people have stopped posting here over the past year or two--and I can't say I blame them. And I know many reviewers who never or almost never post here. I believe only a small percentage of TER members post on the discussion boards, based on all the reviews I see from handles who don't show up in discussion threads. Are all of those people not "real hobbyists"? Are providers who don't post here not "real providers"?

P.S. Just so those who don't know how to follow a discussion thread and/or don't read posts before replying are aware, my post was addressed to vorlon.

Posted By: vorlon

1) His scores are almost always as good a score as the provider has gotten
2) Often he is the only review or one of the very first reviews for a given provider
3) None of these providers has given him a whitelist
4) Little board activity and none for quite some time

It's enough to make me wonder if there is a real hobbyist behind the account.

-- Modified on 9/10/2016 3:42:34 PM