Where did you come up with the notion that I did that? The only review I did of her is the one that is posted...I never posted a previous review of her with lower scores. If you had a lousy visit with her then I'm guessing YMMV.
If anyone else out there read this "other" previous review with lower scores that was alledgedly posted under my username, speak up because I want to hear what it said.
But if anyone out there, especially those who regularly read new reviews as they come out, read the review I did of Lacey when it first posted, and can confirm that the review that is posted now is the original review I did, and not a revised version, please chime in here.
I did one change to the review when it first posted. I changed the link that I originally provided because that link went to a BP search for the name Lacey in South Dakota and it brought up a list of more than one Lacey. I contacted TER with a link that went specifically to her BP ad, and they changed the link within a day.
What I don't understand is why did you see her if you apparently read a bad review on her? Also, are you sure we are talking about the same Lacey? There have been more than one Lacey posting in the SF area for a while now. If the Lacey you visited was a very tall brunette then that would be the one I reviewed.
Like I said before, if your visit with her was lousy then apparently YMMV with her, But the bottom line is, I didn't delete a review of her (I didn't know reviewers could even delete reviews) then post another, more stellar review of her. And, frankly, I don't like this implication that I did.
Looking for a couple hours of entertainment on Sunday evening in the Sioux Falls area. References Avail. Thanks
...if she is available. She is a nice girl, pretty eyes, two reviews so far (one of them from me)
Question for you soulshaker67. You deleted your first review of her with very low scores. You then had it re-posted with higher scores. What gives?
I saw her two weeks ago, and I was not impressed. Didn't do a review because yours (your first one) said it all. Don't understand you man.
Where did you come up with the notion that I did that? The only review I did of her is the one that is posted...I never posted a previous review of her with lower scores. If you had a lousy visit with her then I'm guessing YMMV.
If anyone else out there read this "other" previous review with lower scores that was alledgedly posted under my username, speak up because I want to hear what it said.
But if anyone out there, especially those who regularly read new reviews as they come out, read the review I did of Lacey when it first posted, and can confirm that the review that is posted now is the original review I did, and not a revised version, please chime in here.
I did one change to the review when it first posted. I changed the link that I originally provided because that link went to a BP search for the name Lacey in South Dakota and it brought up a list of more than one Lacey. I contacted TER with a link that went specifically to her BP ad, and they changed the link within a day.
What I don't understand is why did you see her if you apparently read a bad review on her? Also, are you sure we are talking about the same Lacey? There have been more than one Lacey posting in the SF area for a while now. If the Lacey you visited was a very tall brunette then that would be the one I reviewed.
Like I said before, if your visit with her was lousy then apparently YMMV with her, But the bottom line is, I didn't delete a review of her (I didn't know reviewers could even delete reviews) then post another, more stellar review of her. And, frankly, I don't like this implication that I did.
...from rdon regarding his assertion that I alledgedly deleted a review and replaced it with a review with inflated scores. Well, rdon, you can read my response to your allegation in the previous post. I'm now writing this because I've yet to hear anything of value from you regarding your allegation. I certainly don't appreciate having someone else imply that I'm in some type of cahoots with one of the local providers to the point of writing a fake review for them. So if you have something to back up that allegation then share it.
Otherwise I will have to make my own assumptions regarding this issue. My assumption is that you made the whole thing up. I don't know why you would, but there isn't any other explanation I can think of. Either that, or you have me or the provider mixed up with someone else.
I also have to assume you never actually saw Lacey. Because if you did, and had a less-than-impressive experience, and you alledgedly saw my fake second review, one would assume you would have gone ahead and wrote a review of your experience.
You said you were going to write one, but mine already said everything there was to say, right? Then somehow that original review was replaced by a much better review, correct? I think if it were me that saw that occur I would have gone ahead with my plan to write a review to let others know of my experience since the other review that "said it all" was now deleted. Hell, that would give me that much more incentive to get my review out there for others to see.
But you didn't. Hmmm.
So those are my allegations that I will make about you (it kinda pisses you off when some total stranger makes stuff up about you, doesn't it?).
But I will give you the benefit of the doubt and not be so presumptious. After all, when one looks at the facts, one would notice for the SF area there is a review for a girl named Lacie, and two more for Lacey. Also, on BP Sioux Falls area there are currently two girls going by the name Lacey, both with the same area codes.
Well, I've said my piece. If I actually did write an inflated review and someone noticed it, and they went and saw that provider based off that fake review, and saw that said provider didn't live up to the review, and came on here and declared that my review was fake I certainly wouldn't be trying to confront the guy in this manner because I would know that he was correct in his allegation and the truth would come out. But that isn't the case here, so I will call rdon out on this.
Rdon, waiting for your response.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
