Write Review
2,074,032 Total Reviews 3,950 New Reviews
8,582 Users Online

Minnesota

When they're old enough ...
mark.4444 9 Reviews 772 reads
posted

The problem with "when they're old enough" is that there is only one “best time” for a circumcision (speaking strictly surgically) – newborn.  http://www.circinfo.net/the_procedure_itself.html

Adult circumcision means stitches and scarring with much more uncertain outcomes.

If the decision were easy, there would be no controversy.

push_pull1737 reads

Do you find uncircumcised penises more pleasure-giving than circumcised?

According to this website, uncut is much more pleasurable than cut. What's the word from the 'front line', as it were?

Related Link: http://sexasnatureintendedit.com/

ReplyQuoteReport
MsChayse1406 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
MsDynamite901 reads


At least id hope so how can one really tell?
I have to agree with Ms leann .
Looks like another study done on a small controlled group of people with all anomalies removed
to make it sound legit like most "scientific studies"  
I love them cut or uncut. :)

Posted By: push_pull
Do you find uncircumcised penises more pleasure-giving than circumcised?

According to this website, uncut is much more pleasurable than cut. What's the word from the 'front line', as it were?

ReplyQuoteReport
mark.44441292 reads

There have been no studies that I have ever found to suggest there any difference in physical responses for women (of course, YMMV). This book is not a study, just a long sales pitch.

There **have** been studies pointing out an aesthetic preference (still nearly 90% in our culture).

By now we all understand that uncircumcised is natural, but nature also intended for us to run about naked with exposed penises. Nature didn’t anticipate all-cotton kangaroo-pouch briefs or silk boxers.

Circumcision is cosmetic surgery for the very young; it isn't done for medical reasons.

- - - - - - -

http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.html (a real study)

It was fascinating to find that so many women thought a circumcised penis seemed more natural, probably meaning to them "familiar" within the American cultural context.

Even when women grow up with uncircumcised fathers and brothers, or have uncircumcised sexual partners, the majority of such a group still prefer circumcised sexual partners.


and sort of related, for any stragglers still out there who aren't sure …


http://www.scarleteen.com/article/body/anatomy_pink_parts_female_sexual_anatomy

The clitoris … [has] twice the number of sensory nerve endings the penis does, and it also interacts with over 15,000 nerve endings throughout the whole pelvic area.

The vagina itself, especially past the first, front 1/3rd of it, has hardly any sensory nerve endings at all. [It's all connected, though. More details in the article.]


and finally, an anecdotal comment (notice she has no comment on how it felt) …


http://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/circumcision-pros-and-cons

"That extra skin adds some surprise value the first time you unzip his pants, but that's about it," says Mandy, 26, of New York City. "A penis is a penis, and they are all plenty sensitive."

ReplyQuoteReport
MsDynamite1000 reads

There's even a foreskin replacement surgery available now and a movement of disgruntled men claiming they were mutilated against their will, now that maybe true but really would anyone wanna go through all that?  
Circumcision was really meant for religious practices, still confused as to how its been transformed to be medically better when there's no back up .  

Posted By: mark.4444
There have been no studies that I have ever found to suggest there any difference in physical responses for women (of course, YMMV). This book is not a study, just a long sales pitch.

There **have** been studies pointing out an aesthetic preference (still nearly 90% in our culture).

By now we all understand that uncircumcised is natural, but nature also intended for us to run about naked with exposed penises. Nature didn’t anticipate all-cotton kangaroo-pouch briefs or silk boxers.

Circumcision is cosmetic surgery for the very young; it isn't done for medical reasons.

- - - - - - -

http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.html (a real study)

It was fascinating to find that so many women thought a circumcised penis seemed more natural, probably meaning to them "familiar" within the American cultural context.

Even when women grow up with uncircumcised fathers and brothers, or have uncircumcised sexual partners, the majority of such a group still prefer circumcised sexual partners.


and sort of related, for any stragglers still out there who aren't sure …


http://www.scarleteen.com/article/body/anatomy_pink_parts_female_sexual_anatomy

The clitoris … [has] twice the number of sensory nerve endings the penis does, and it also interacts with over 15,000 nerve endings throughout the whole pelvic area.

The vagina itself, especially past the first, front 1/3rd of it, has hardly any sensory nerve endings at all. [It's all connected, though. More details in the article.]


and finally, an anecdotal comment (notice she has no comment on how it felt) …


http://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/circumcision-pros-and-cons

"That extra skin adds some surprise value the first time you unzip his pants, but that's about it," says Mandy, 26, of New York City. "A penis is a penis, and they are all plenty sensitive."

ReplyQuoteReport
push_pull1430 reads

Posted By: MsDynamite
There's even a foreskin replacement surgery available now and a movement of disgruntled men claiming they were mutilated against their will, now that maybe true but really would anyone wanna go through all that?  
Circumcision was really meant for religious practices, still confused as to how its been transformed to be medically better when there's no back up .  
I have to say I agree with that. The original reason was religious, as you say, to nullify the sensation, when enjoying sex was considered to be sinful. Doing it to infants just seems wrong but it's so deep in the culture now it's been normalized. There may well be strong arguments for having it done, but it just seems to me that it should be left to the individual when they're old enough to make sense of the argument...

-- Modified on 9/20/2011 11:50:32 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
mark.4444773 reads

The problem with "when they're old enough" is that there is only one “best time” for a circumcision (speaking strictly surgically) – newborn.  http://www.circinfo.net/the_procedure_itself.html

Adult circumcision means stitches and scarring with much more uncertain outcomes.

If the decision were easy, there would be no controversy.

ReplyQuoteReport
AustinXO1265 reads

I've been very fond of both actually.  It depends on whose carting it around I guess! ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
FreyjaVixen1010 reads

In my experience, on a totally base level I find uncircumcised penises more pleasurable than circumcised. Given that however, if a man knows how to use his penis in a way that is pleasurable to both partners, through time and practice -- it doesn't matter if he's circumcised or not. The same goes for size and girth. In my personal opinion, you have what you have and the anatomical structure of it shouldn't matter if you have the right intentions in mind ; - ).

xoxo,
Freyja.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!