Beauty has standards, we have established set of criteria who we call 10 or 8 or higher than 6. Sex acts have standards, total submissive and nymphos are higher in scale like 10 vs someone who is passive and restricted like 3. For massage someone who CMT, can navigate prostate area and attentive to manhood with genuine interest will get 10 vs someone who passively mover her hand and give cbj with no suction etc is a 4. So GUYS, do not put a GND a 9 who is so bla and so dull. If you did not sleep with a woman for six months and going through dry spell, just keep that in mind that her service is blah to other who get laid and home as well has side chic and go party and bang chics. We have better and frequent experience with lots of beautiful girls socially and secretly. So dont score high just because you had good sex after a year of bad sex or dry spell.
I am very grateful for the insight you have gained in your six months of experience, and the clarity with which you express it.
Six month? Ahaha ha… short sighted as always you are lockstock…
Twelve months? Two years? How long?
Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's views and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every ones valid opinion, i honestly believe that i completely forgot what i was going to say.
You could let people decide on their own how they want o rate a provider? Lmao.
You are a solid 10. So thats why i wont give a blah GND more than 4
But I doubt anyone is going to pay attention to you.
And appearance, of course there's a a known measurement about that and it must be considered in your scoring.
For example, blondes versus brunettes versus redheads. Always it is score more for blondes, score less for brunettes and two less for redheads because that is standard in the world.
And voice, is very important. If polite and sweet and talk like little girl, score high.
If too womanly and confident, very low score.
I will let someone else explain boob scoring, face scoring, and all the other things.
This is the way to score the womens. 🤪
Perhaps its time to move on off this work Lady. Oh, I forgot to add age as higher age might score lower perhaps may be sort of…
… she’s feeling lucky that you won’t be gracing her doorstep.
Perhaps a flexi glass bubble ball fortune teller you are!!!
That's too bad for you, because you will miss out on ladies like this, I'm 50+
https://ladyannaloves.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/138735754/editor/20220626-152833.jpg
I personally find Redheads more attractive than Blondes and Brunettes. Just a matter of personal opinion and taste.
I'm guessing you fog up a lot of mirrors talking to yourself but you should leave your thoughts in the sink where they belong.
Worth reporting head scratching lol
Again.... someones 3 can be someone elses 10. Someone could have had an amazing time with a companion and all they did was cuddle. (now the rating system wont let them get a 10) but they could have had a great time.
Who are you and others to tell people how they should "rate" based on looks. Performace they have rates because of actual acts that happened.
BUT LOOKS.
here is the easiest way I always explain it. Think of Pick up Trucks (I am not comparing women to Trucks just using it as an example). People have their favorite be if FORD, CHEVY, or DODGE. They all are a little different have different features, different lay outs, etc. But people have their "type". Just like with the partners or companions they choose. Someone might like a Red head more and give a higher rating. Someone might like someone skinny where as someone wants them more plump. Some like they on the older side (MILF). To each their own.
You have no right trying to tell people how to rate others.
For one..... you were not with the people during the encounter and have no clue what went on. You dont know that if a companion provided a warm caring time and that is what the client was needing. Which made the companion even more attractive in the eyes of the client.
The most commonly used word in TER is YMMV. Second most used- SCAM or FRAUD. Third used is LE. Okay. That is why the rating and standardization in rating is needed. If Ugly Betty is Candice Swanepoel in your rating , then mister it is JUST wrong and deceiving. You have NO right to deceive people for their money.
BUT IT IS SUBJECTIVE. That is the issue and where you are wrong.
Like I mentioned some people are not into "looks" they are into the body. Some are into body and not looks... Others are into just having a nice time with a woman. It all plays into the experience.
I also hate it when others try to tell people how to "rate" a personal experience. You are trying to tell people what is "beautiful" or "attractive". When everyone has different personal preferences.
PEOPLE LIKE YOU are the reason why many companions hate this board and left this board.
You are desperate to make everyone to just fall in line and. IGNORE the first criteria “ does she look as she posted in picture” and “whether she is beautiful”. And beauty is NOT subjective. It is NOT the eye of the beholder. Just like supermodels are overwhelmingly accepted as beauty standards in fashion and clothing. There is NOT subjectivity in modeling, fashion i industry or in film production. Casting member for porn even that has standards. YOU CANNOT FOOL people by asking that to accept your sweetheart UGLY BETTY as Candice Swanepoel. This is just YOU being a FEMINAZI. You go spend your money on trash. I am trying to set standards.
How am I trying to make people fall for "my criteria"
I have stated everyone has a different opinion.
You are the one trying to make people fallow a criteria.
YES BEAUTY IS SUBJECTIVE..... There are "super models" that I think are ugly, too skinny, etc.
Also where did I say anything about an "ugly betty" being a super model. I DIDNT.
This shows you are grasping at straws to try to prove your point.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Like I mentioned some people find blondes to be ugly or not as attractive as redheads.
Here is a prime example. You have only rated one as a 9 in looks (per your reviews). She has tattoos lots of them.... many might find that "unattractive".... but you didnt.
If someone thinks beauty isn't subjective, move on. I have had some "red hot" women who did very little for me and some very average-looking ladies who really made my day. I recently met with an over-50 lady who gave me the best BBBJ ever. She also had a great personality. I had way more fun than with some hot 20-somethings.
That's never going to happen. Whether you like it or not, everyone has different standards. It IS in the eye of the beholder. Sure, most people are going to agree that supermodels are more attractive than most women. But you won't get people to agree that all super models are extraordinarily attractive or that there aren't other women who are every bit as attractive as super models. So, I suggest you stop it because going around attacking everyone who disagrees with you is not a winning strategy.
Suggesting a rating system for something subjective like “looks”?
I’d suspect you score a “zero” on logically thought.
-- Modified on 5/7/2024 7:27:16 PM
You do you! Okay.
Yet you are trying to make people conform to your standards when giving reviews.
How is that "you doing you".