...you have only a 3 or 4 point system at best. Since, if you did your research, you should never meet anyone below about a 7. We should just name the first 6 things like this:
1. I don't read reviews
2. I thought maybe that Czech model might really be in town
3. I liked seeing the pimp in the mirror.
4. I like to seek out bad experiences and then bitch about it.
5. How do you do that image searchy thing
6. She said: "it's me or it's free!
Posted By: craiglist4
...you have only a 3 or 4 point system at best. Since, if you did your research, you should never meet anyone below about a 7. We should just name the first 6 things like this:
1. I don't read reviews
2. I thought maybe that Czech model might really be in town
3. I liked seeing the pimp in the mirror.
4. I like to seek out bad experiences and then bitch about it.
5. How do you do that image searchy thing
6. She said: "it's me or it's free!"
2-7 and others who rate 7-9
etc
I guess its who they see and whether are capable of seeing beauty.
Some rank 1.5 above the mean others rank 1.5 below. Others are within a half point.
This variability is another reason for taking out simply cruel rating categories
I did my research, read the reviews, and wasn't disappointed at all in the lady's appearance or performance. In fact I've had some great sensual massages from providers I'd say were Average or Nice looking.
What irks me on the Appearance scoring scheme is how some reviewers can be downright cruel... or brainless. For example, they rave about the provider's looks and then give her a 5. Or worse, they give a score of 4 or less to a provider who never gets below 6 and routinely gets 7s and above. I've met some of these providers and know that there's no way anyone who's being fair could say that she's "OK if you're drunk".
Posted By: craiglist4
... Since, if you did your research, you should never meet anyone below about a 7. ...
We simplify the appearance rating scale to a mere 3 point scale:
1. She bought/sold/bartered her previous reviews
2. Real deal
3. For fucks sake you need to see her for her menu and not looks alone
"Athletic" plus photos and reviews can be useful. But keep in mind all opinions about someone's appearance are subjective. That's why you see for example providers with appearance scores ranging from 4 to 10. Don't go only by the numbers, or labels from drop-down lists.
-- Modified on 9/5/2015 2:10:19 PM
To me, if I hear the word "athletic", I'm always thinking someone in very good shape, i.e., an athlete. However, I've learned through hobbying in MN that many bigger Midwestern ladies here are also athletic...just not my type of athletic.
Posted By: t@kkosupreme
Is it just me or is "Athletic" a totally subjective and basically useless term to describe body type?
When reviewers started listing obvious BBW's as "athleltic" is exactly when I decided that reviews scores are somewhat useless, I stopped caring about them .
Not at all saying being BBW is bad or can't be healthy but I wouldn't even try to call myself "athletic" body type even though I've been in crossfit training and cycling most of my life and qualify as such according to my lifestyle.
Maybe they aren't talking about body shape at all lol but what their body can do .
Posted By: OldTimerB
To me, if I hear the word "athletic", I'm always thinking someone in very good shape, i.e., an athlete. However, I've learned through hobbying in MN that many bigger Midwestern ladies here are also athletic...just not my type of athletic.
Posted By: t@kkosupreme
Is it just me or is "Athletic" a totally subjective and basically useless term to describe body type?
You make up "problems" so you can solve them. You set a dividing line to try to bring out opinions so you can eventually solve all hobby problems don't you? You cause the debate to devolve into what you envisioned.
That's not discussion BM. That's case in point manipulation for which you are known for.
As I don't give a rats ass about you anymore I am free to give my opinion...
I don't care about the un-PC wording of the rating scale. It's been the same rating scale for all eternity since I have been on this board which is probably as long as you and you and you, believe it or not. It is what it is. You BM of all people have the power to change things on TER so do it behind the scenes if you truly cared.
Regarding reviews, ratings, and such...
There is both deflation and inflation of scores as we all know. I think that strategy is more targeted than we all give credit. Let's be honest here. I agree with another response on this thread that you can find a genuinely great time with a provider that has lower appearance scores as well as a shit time with a top 5 MN provider. I think the honest review is a lost art and both client and provider are worse off for it.
The tired old stratification of providers is still around. It's a plan to both promote the in crowd and denigrate the out crowd. Then there's bat shit crazy so the waters become muddy.
Hobby as you feel fit is my ultimate opinion. Take a gamble on a BP provider or take a gamble on a reviewed TER provider. Sometimes there is no difference these days. With the state of affairs today you need to question ad posts, reviews, board posts, everything...
Or will you pull this post as I expect you to?