Option 1) This person is the most beautiful and sexiest person you've ever seen, an absolute 10.
The sex you two will have would be rated by you as a 4 performance.

Option 2) This person is the ugliest and the most sexually unappealing person you've ever seen, an absolute 1. The sex you two will have would be rated by you as a 10 performance.

Why?

When I know I can find a 10 / 10 for the same amount of money that it would cost to see a 4 / 10 or a 10 / 4 why would I even give the light of day to either one of them.

Both would have to be the last two women standing in this world for me to give them a second look and I know that is not the case.

a six...at least, knowingly (i.e., sometimes you don't know what she looks like till you meet).  I can get "average" at home, in the workplace, wherever.  In a session I'm paying for, I want a face whose beauty I can drink in.

For me, sex is 90% mental, and beauty is part of that.  Not that I'd ALWAYS take beauty first; one of the hottest ladies I ever was with was a dud in our session.

But, ugly?  No thanks.

Great question!



-- Modified on 6/22/2012 8:04:46 PM

-- Modified on 6/22/2012 8:05:03 PM

Great comment!   As most of us know, sex and sensuality is about the mind, our most active erotic body part.  Most of us guys are visual, which means a hot looking woman does turn us on or as one poster said recently gives us "instant wood".  But I have also been with a hot looking woman and beyond the visual there is no connection, no chemistry.  The chemistry is important and the look is part of that, but a welcoming sensually appealing attitude, as well as great skills are also a big part of the turn-on, imho.

I would have to go with the good looks.  I'm as much into the
visuals as anything else.  Have to agree with oldguy on this one.

People opinions of others are biased by their appearance, whether they realize it or not.  
So an attractive provider will get higher marks for performance on average, than a less attractive woman.

Honestly, I don't believe there is anyway I could have a 10 performance session with someone I consider ugly.  But if I had to choose, I would go with option 1; really hot looks can compensate somewhat for mediocre to poor performance.

That is a ridiculous hypothesis. These are women we are paying to be both attractive and good in bed.  Why the fuck would would you choose anything less?

-- Modified on 6/22/2012 3:22:09 PM

Haven't you ever heard of a blind fold and an imagination???

I'll totally take the ugly girl who knows how to work magic!

My favorite clients are not young and ripped; I'll just say THAT!  HA!

I've had option 1 before and she kept me from seeing her looks most of the time. When I could see her, she closed her eyes. That's a big part of a poor performance score. Let's face it; dim lighting and a few drinks can change your mental image of an average looking gal so long as she's into it.

I've never had option 2, but there was a gal that I'd say was a 5 for looks that I really became fond of (and many others did too). Her performance was a 9 I'd say. The last 2-3 sessions I had with her were insanely hot.

Frankly I think option 2 is impossible. "The ugliest and the most sexually unappealing person you've ever seen" with a 10 for performance?

Let's be more realistic:
1) a 10 for looks that's a 5 for performance
2) a 5 for looks that's a 10 for performance.

Which would I likely repeat? Probably 2.

The ladies chose option 2 (performance over appearance) And yes, I would chose option 1 (appearance over performance) Like most men, its all about the visual.. The pussy is a given, It's whats around the pussy that matters.

Many bitch and come raise a hissy fit on the boards, others threaten to out us and blackmail us in private.

This is just a general observation and not a reference to Trinity or you specifically.

suck and fucks besides the price of course. It is not because of the looks.

...for looks on this site as ugly or dogs. Or if she has a 7 in looks you're slumming (like why on earth would you pay for that).  I've read many a times how a TER score on looks basically gets bumped down 2 IRL (in real life)  ex. a TER 7 is a "real world" 5.


Bitching about looks on this site is pretty pointless tho imo.

Not a pretty face? So what? I've had awesome sex with women who did not have pretty faces. That is not a deal breaker at all. They were great in bed, and that's what mattered.

Bad hygiene? Cruel or capricious personality? Morbid obesity? Intoxication or chemical dependency? Just lays there and is not an active participant in sex? Now those are contraindications.

and so I've never given anyone a 10. How will I know who's "Once in a lifetime" until I am laying on my deathbed after (hopefully) a long life of travel, party, and debauchery?

All vaginas feel the same (with some notable exceptions, please see my reviews). But really, it's the owner of that vagina who gives you the mental and emotional high, who gives you that great orgasm you can't find with anybody else. I have found sexual experiences are unique to the individuals you have them with. If sex was only physical, then an orgasm with a woman would be no different from one you give yourself, and that just ain't so!

Generally speaking (and yes there are many exceptions) men are more aroused by sheer looks.  My suspicion is this is even more true among hobbyists.

definitely the second alternative.  Remember that old Calypso song ..
"If you want to be happy for the rest of your life,
never make a pretty woman your wife.  
And from my personal point of view,
get an ugly woman to marry you!"

Great old song, but lyrics direct us to marry the ugly woman, NOT pay her for having fun.... that is reserved for the hot looking women  lol.  Seriously, I think it was you who posted recently about the importance of chemistry and I agree.   If fate allows, I would rather have the great chemistry with a beautiful woman.  The song kind of presupposes that beautiful women are all about themselves and as we here in MN know, some of our most gorgeous providers are also extraordinarly gifted lovers who actually see to our needs and pleasure.

-- Modified on 6/23/2012 2:55:31 PM

Does physical beauty (i.e., looks) have anything to do with sexual performance? I'm not saying that one either implies or rules out the other, I'm saying the two factors are independent of one another. While it is true that a physically appealing woman will get a man aroused more quickly at first contact, if her personality is ugly and her demeanor in bed corpse-like, I believe that initial advantage would rapidly vanish.

I find that the more a woman is into the sex, the better I think she looks.  At the same time, if she's attractive enough, I can overlook to some degree other areas where she is not so good and still enjoy sex with her.

What about the girl who has good looks and offers 10 service? Hint... Hint...

.....that is really what turns all of us men on...just like looking at your beautiful pixs..wow, I wish was in the metro to sample that beauty and passion.

Posted By: Heaven Elise

What about the girl who has good looks and offers 10 service? Hint... Hint...



-- Modified on 6/25/2012 10:13:26 PM

Actions

• Reply
• Quote
• Report this Post
• Ignore User