... of your saying one thing and doing another. You say you welcome everyone's opinion. But when someone posts an opinion you don't like, you attack them. How can you honestly say you're open to others' opinions when you attack people who give an opinion in a civil manner? How does that foster a free exchange of information and opinions here?
And as you know, there was more that you said in your post about who should post about BJs (even though the OP had nothing to do with giving BJs--it was about music preferences). Conveniently for you, your post was removed. I would have preferred it stay up as another example of how what you say differs from how you act. But many people read that post, and they can draw their own conclusions--about that, and about whether my post above violates the guidelines for this board and should therefore be removed, as you assert.
(A request to whomever is having posts like loveyourtouch's in the recent BJ music thread removed: would you please stop doing that? Such posts need to stay up.)
Hey, OTB... you were saying something about no one here talking about WKs? 
Posted By: loveyourtouch
In typical fashion, a WK has stepped up to defend his queen by totally misrepresenting what I wrote. You are so in the tank for your lady that you do not even bother to read what I actually wrote. Either that or you're simply too smitten for her kitten or not smart enough to understand what was written.... Either way, what you wrote is totally wrong and misleading...but it's come to be expected from you.
Here is what I wrote about the BJs: "I figured if anyone would initiate a bj discussion it would be a true cum guzzling champ."
There is NOTHING in that sentence that implies or even hints at limiting what others say or write. I didn't challenge her right to say anything or post anything. I wrote that if someone is going to talk like they're a champ at something perhaps they really should be a champ. Nowhere did I suggest she didn't have the right to write that. And at no time did I cry to anyone (TER) asking to remove the post. I didn't try to limit or control anyone's speech. So what are you crying about? Or did you really just chime in because a certain WK-favored lady is involved?
I guess the irony eludes you. Rather than have the Consolation Prize winner give the victory speech, I'd prefer to hear from the Champ.
Just another case of a WK rushing to the rescue where none is needed. She's clearly able to post here. Why not let her comment if she deems it necessary?
Sort of funny, isn't it, that had I written about you what you wrote about me, the post would be removed because the WKs would cry foul.
Give me an example where I have written one thing and did another. I do welcome everyone's opinion. And when I disagree with the message, I will, in turn, voice my opinion. That's the point. People expressing differing thoughts. We differ because I love the free exchange of thought whereas you want to shut down other people's thoughts. If you don't like the message or messenger, instead of challenging the message, you want to censor (remove) the threads.
Yes, there was more to my post, but NONE OF IT had anything to do with censorship. And you're intellectually bankrupt for suggesting that I cherry picked that info. Bogus claim. I would have preferred to have that post remain for all to read. That was my intention of posting it..... to show that fallacy of your position.
Where, oh, where did I ever assert anything you wrote should be removed? You might want to re-read that last sentence, if that's the one you're referring to because that is not what that sentence says. That sentence was pointing out the irony and double standards that seem to exist in here. So once again..... YOU ARE WRONG!
Final thoughts.... OTB did not mention WKs here. I did because it was appropriate. Notice you never challenge the actual facts of a discussion. You pivot and divert.
And as knots requested... PLEASE leave this posted so everyone can read just how much he twists what is actually written when he responds
... for an example, here you go. Note how you advised other people to "move on" etc. But it's clear from your posts over the past couple of months that your advice to others doesn't apply to you, i.e. you're incapable of moving on.
Good day to you. I am done here.
Posted By: loveyourtouch
Give me an example where I have written one thing and did another. I do welcome everyone's opinion. And when I disagree with the message, I will, in turn, voice my opinion. That's the point. People expressing differing thoughts. We differ because I love the free exchange of thought whereas you want to shut down other people's thoughts. If you don't like the message or messenger, instead of challenging the message, you want to censor (remove) the threads.
Yes, there was more to my post, but NONE OF IT had anything to do with censorship. And you're intellectually bankrupt for suggesting that I cherry picked that info. Bogus claim. I would have preferred to have that post remain for all to read. That was my intention of posting it..... to show that fallacy of your position.
Where, oh, where did I ever assert anything you wrote should be removed? You might want to re-read that last sentence, if that's the one you're referring to because that is not what that sentence says. That sentence was pointing out the irony and double standards that seem to exist in here. So once again..... YOU ARE WRONG!
Final thoughts.... OTB did not mention WKs here. I did because it was appropriate. Notice you never challenge the actual facts of a discussion. You pivot and divert.
And as knots requested... PLEASE leave this posted so everyone can read just how much he twists what is actually written when he responds.
-- Modified on 12/12/2016 1:37:32 PM
You were done before you started.
After all this and your copying/pasting my posts, you have yet to show anywhere that I asked for anyone to be censored or have a thread removed. Not only were you not in the same game, you're not in the same league.
Voicing a differing point of view is NOT censoring someone or limiting their ability to post what they want. I'll move along when I think it's time, but I'm not moving on when someone writes something that is so misleading and/or incorrect. I'll address any jabs directed at me. I'll even swat the little pesty, insignificant gnats when they spew their drivel.
And once again, you write something way out of context. That "move along" comment was in response to a WK's posting telling people to move along if they don't like something on the board. When I suggest that someone move along, it's because they are bitching that something's being discussed. If they don't like the discussion, then move along. Or, they can join in and voice an opinion. Otherwise they're just sitting on the sidelines complaining. I think that is what you call being a troll.
You really struggle with critical thinking and reading comprehension, don't you? PM me and I'll give you some tips
ROTFLMAO😄
Voicing a differing point of view is NOT censoring someone or limiting their ability to post what they want.
