And reviews back it up. How long can that go on before something happens. Never seen that one. Wierd.

two.  I don't recall who found it and posted, but I think the woman was in Texas, but I could be wrong on that.  You are right, though....  can't see anything going wrong there, huh???  I just can't image in this day and age why anyone M or F would engage in such activity, but....  I guess it takes all kinds.  There are a few local girls that have been known to provide BBFS although they do not advertise it.  There are some such reviews.

Well said. The reviews confirmed it too, It just slipped i there! This is a Dallas provid

Russian Roulette

I had someone asking about BBFS the other day!!! And when I said NO!!! He said he's giving up on life & his fantasies cause he can't find anyone who will fulfill it!!! Lmfao!!!!  

Sounds like a really sad/pathetic individual, and depending how serious he was, he sounds like someone who really needs help.  I'm sure he can find his BBFS fantasy if he keeps looking.  I just wonder if all the extras he might get (and pass along) are part of his fantasy.

In the civie world!

Exactly!! I agree with you 100000% on this!!!!!   I just don't know why people want to be that selfish, especially if he's married, his poor SO!!! These days you can contract hpv virus just by touching!!!   It's a scary world of stds out there!!!  

... so guys who care at all about safety can avoid her.  What's worse IMO is the BBFS that goes on secretly.  And what's worse still are the low lifes who put BBFS into a review when it never happened, for revenge (she didn't do something he demanded) or some other reason.

Then he should stay in the civie world with the BBFS!!!   But this idiot wanted to do a fantasy if doing a Creampie , he's exact wording: "Bare & Sloppy seconds".   I didn't know what that meant but my answer stays the same: HELLLZZZZZZ NNNNOOOOOOOO!!!!  

How is that worse still?

... the provider doing BBFS when it never happened isn't a despicable act, I don't know what to say to you.

WTF, so gross about?? It's the way nature meant for us to fucking each other!  Can believe you a ho, and thinks BBFS is gross. If you truly believe you can catch something from touching, why you sucking dick bb?

If the bbfs is a lie and therefore never occurred then there is no way of comparing it  
to the dangers of true bbfs.  
I would like to add it's irritating when a review isn't clear, and may even be trying to elude to it, yet never really stating bbfs outright. Maybe some of those reviews are retaliation too.

It's natures way.  You old people show know better, in the 70s and 80s, no one gives a shit about condom.  Just pull it out method.

That pull it out method only worked when we remembered or could focus clearly lol. Good times back then for sure.

But there can be a huge impact on the provider who got the review claiming falsely that she did BBFS. I know of one case where an FBSM provider got a revenge review because she refused to do FS, so the guy said she did BBFS with him.  She couldn't get the review yanked so she delisted. I'm sure that's not the only time something like that has happened.

After HIV infection, the virus replicates rapidly because there are no antibodies. During this phase it is asymptomatic
Infectiousness occurs, as I understand it, within just a couple weeks of exposure.
Symptoms occur a couple weeks after infection but are non-descript, flu like.
The pull it out method deals (poorly) with pregnancy. It does not do anything for HIV.

Learn to read the medical journal.  It's proven about hpv!!!  

-- Modified on 11/23/2016 6:48:36 PM

But to your points: HIV is but one of many serious diseases one can contract via unprotected sex.

lying review that paints a provider in a positive light (looks/services) that simply ain't warranted.  You're right that BS reviews suck but they in many ways are the norm in the last two years.

Both providers and hobbyists alike. Period.

Good joke.  

A man (?) of few meaningless words. Keep it up baby Einstein.

Why you suck dick bb then.  Pretty sure, there are plenty that you can catch this way too.

Check's  in the mail.
I'll look for a job tomorrow.
I'll pull it  out before I cum.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=10&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=bbfs&SearchType=1&Author=dan&DayFrom=9999&DayTo=0&MessageID=208936&frmSearch=1#208936

-- Modified on 11/23/2016 7:42:47 PM

In the case I mentioned, the guy did see the provider but lied about FS (and BB at that). In the case you linked to, the guy didn't see the provider at all.  I have seen cases like the one you linked to where the review got yanked if the reviewer can produce no evidence that the session happened (e.g. an email confirming it) or if the provider has evidence the review was false, e.g. a PM with a threat to write a false review.

according to Hajboom2 he did see the provider (ie. a written review like everyone else).  And as for "the reviewer can produce no evidence that the session happened", when I saw this provider, it was all done by phone voice (ie. nothing was recorded) so your logic doesn't hold.  From what I know, this reviewer got the short end of the stick here!!  

Also, you might re-read what I posted. There's an "or" that's pretty important.  In logic, "or" is the truth-functional operator of (inclusive) disjunction, also known as alternation.  Thus I disagree that my logic doesn't hold.  Indeed, you've given no logical argument as to why the reviewer in that thread got "the short end of the stick".  Were you in the room during the entire 12-hour session (assuming it occurred) and did you observe the BBFS and other acts that were attributed to the provider?

You might want to check definition  of WK.

You got 3 yawns.

The facts I gave you about my session indicated no PM's or emails where sent to or from... just voice so  
that would cover both your 2 "or" situations ...

unless you are a fly on the wall (we all know you are a fly on the latest pile of XXXX) you won't know either.  Your argument is totes lame like they all are.  BTW...wait, no I'm not going to show that card yet.

i think snotz is starting to talk like a lawyer or something.  He's trying to represent all the hookers out there AND he makes no sense (on purpose) as anyone that knows conversational English enjoys more joys than those that mark it up to sound like they THINK they know everything.

No more. It's Thanksgiving. You've all had plenty of leeway, now go find something else to do other than post in this thread please before bans start getting thrown around.