http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=537134&boardID=12&page=1#537134

Thought it would make for an interesting discussion for a Slow Sunday.

Please share your thoughts & opinions.

I can tell you right now

I'm NOT taking the bait  LOL

The protocol for recent message threads with the lovely Ms. Holiday is that they must take place on Saturdays.

Although we were not treated to a message thread last week, yesterday's thread made up for its absence (and then some).

Note:  Previous Saturday message threads have included provider-to-provider scrapes regarding the sharing of blacklisted status with clients and the need for covered BJ ladies to charge less than their uncovered BJ counterparts. I feel that she went to bat for hobbyists with these topics, but she took a clubbing from other providers.

At least one poster here has shown an inability to keep it civil.

Uugh...so far everything was quite civil.

But with you here....maybe YOU can get the rest of the Knights on their pony's?

A guy decides to bring his new blonde girlfriend to a football game. After the game is over, he asks her if she liked the game.

She replies: "Oh it was great, I loved watching those men in tight clothes, but there is one thing I don't understand."

"What did you not understand ?" he asks.

And the blonde says: "Well, at the beginning of the game, both teams flipped a quarter to see who would kick off first. Then the rest of the game everybody was yelling get the quarter back, get the quarter back, get the quarter back. So I thought to myself, gosh it's just a quarter!"




C'mon, folks! Everybody post the dumbest joke you can think of and let's see if that will shut this thread down before the Filth gets the train wreck he wants at the expense of the Minnesota Discussion Board. ... Again.

Everyone on any board is entitled to their own opinion, including Hilary. I for one, agree with Ms. H about her suggestion on reviews. I played my ass off, literally, to get my reviews. Someone with more than 100 reviews, has a seamly more difficult time getting into the top 100. All it takes is an "off day" to get a bad review and it takes ur next 10 reviews to make up for that one.

Miss HH. No matter what day of the week it is or what Ol' Sticks is doing, the alleged CAP from Illinoise attacked her without ever seeing her. That is not right. I stand with the peeps wanting the truth here. Here say evidence is not admitable in court or here for that mater.

I have no dog in this fight. I'm just curious why you keep bringing it up and why it's so important to you?  If you think HH is over rated that's fine, why do you care? You don't have to see her. If you think she has a lot of WKs, what difference does it make to you?

Maybe have some of HHs July reviewers come on here (who are not regulars of this board) and say they are all true. There really is no way to really verify if they are true or not. Its true with any providers reviews. They're all fiction anyways, according to TER. Or pm them and see if they respond.

That is not fair and I won't do it because I'm not a troal. Sorry.

Just keep playin the game............. You'll get annoying to most here in a few weeks.......

-- Modified on 8/19/2012 8:03:26 PM

Sheesh....my 8 year old nephew makes more sense in replying to questions than you do.

Thank God Minny gets to keep you.

Sorry Minny board members...this peach is all yours  LOL

The Chicago board has too many WK's and maginas already.

And TER has closed the supply cabinets so I can't get any more "mangina repellent" or "white knight repellent".

But they have ordered some more...and you're first in line for it.

Until then...sorry  

I believe I was the one who started the thread on the Policy & Sugestion Board, and what Poppy has written is close to the point I was trying to make.  When a provider starts out, she may have great enthusiasm, and generate high ratings/scores, and then, as the career advances and the enthusiasm wanes, the scores decrease; or the skill set and presentation of self just aren't there at the beginning but are acquired as time goes by; or she may start out at a level and maintain that level throughout her career.  My original suggestion was that scores be weighted--less weight for a score from early in the career, more weight for a score later in the career.  (I think lots of hobbyists actually do this intuitively/unconsciously anyway when using scores to decide whether or not to see a provider.)  And it is the case that, statistically, the more reviews/ratings/scores you have, the harder it is to change your overall average, for better or worse.  So the system of averaging gives no room for improvement/longevity.

he just thinks he's being cute doing EMO- just to get our collective goats.

Great!!!!!

Then you should know why the tomato turned red?   Because he saw Mr Green Pee!!!!!!  

Hey don't laugh, I told that joke in 1st grade (teacher asked if anyone had any jokes to tell)...... later in the year, the teacher asked the class..... "where does chocolate milk come from?     I said from milking a bull....

Hey you said dumbest

there.....