he assistant  says he is a female he is a male.  
   
He will schedule girls to see blacklisted clients and not care about their well being - girls have been raped, physically harmed etc. Em is so money hungry he will schedule the next girl to see the predator. E favors providers he likes by getting uncovered services and starting businesses with them.    
   
   
One provider in particular whom I'm sure will chime on here claiming he is is harmless is one he favors & has started a business with. Her & her boyfriend have started a client database where all your information is stored. I screened with he with employment & I was not fond of discovering all of my information is stored - stored in the hands of a perp who has already had serious contact with police.    
   
   
I have met with over 8 providers who use he as their scheduler and all but two have had horrible story's & have been treated like they are only money to him. Something needs to be done here - most of the providers say if they fire him he will retaliate & write false reviews to ruin their business & not hand over their ad accounts also hack their emails. Another gal I met said he wanted full service and she will barter have her incall paid for. She declined & experienced a huge decline in business & harassment. These girls will not get any business if he is upset with them. It's disheartening and wrong. If you have been a victim of him do not be scared to leave.    
   
There is much more to be said I cannot remember every last thing I was informed - however what I can remember is sickening. He seems great - easy to verify but what goes on behind the scenes is horrendous & needs to be put to a stop

.... some of that before. Knew years ago Em is a guy and know his real name. I always laugh when I read a review and the reviewer talks about how sweet the scheduler was...like he was hitting on a girl.  

I have a very good reputation in this hobby, both in keeping clients safe AND in keeping providers safe.  Hundreds of people on this board know that.  I would never hire someone that did not hold my safety first and foremost, or the safety of the girls.

Not only is Rape a very serious accusation, it's evil to lie about.  Someone (actually, there are a few) that started these rumors after Em stopped doing business with them.  Em is hired, not hiring.  PERIOD.  

It seems there are two sides to this story. I'd like to hear from more people either on here or pm. These are serious allegations.

So which is it?  Bitter hobbyist or disgruntled provider?  Either way that's some pretty hurtful lies you are spreading.

For those who have seen me know my feelings about this site so for me to come on here and actually interact, it's a big deal.  
On that note, shame on you for this slander. I'm not sure who shit in your coffee today but your actions are uncalled for. If you have really talked to ladies that work personally with Em then you would be singing a different tune.  
Em has always been a major support system for me (3+ years) and my friends and has never made me feel less than or cross boundaries.  
This is a difficult business to be in and without someone like Em, I wouldn't be able to be in class full time or have time to myself since answering emails can be overwhelming at times. Em gives me the freedom to be me when I'm not at work. You can't put a price on that.  

Rape, indeed, is a serious crime and accusation. Falsely claiming rape is, to me, just as serious because someone's life is easily destroyed merely by the allegation. I hope my post didn't come across as one minimizing that.

Wow… I’m just floored by this post.   Nor do I believe it in any way… The interne tis an easy place for people to make accusations and hide with no proof, and many times people will believe what is said without nay backing so I feel obligated to challenge this post… not only for EM, but for the people that use EM.

First, an assistant requiring employment info for screening is inconsistent with the assertion that providers are "only money" to that assistant. If that were the case, why go to the trouble to require that level of verification?

and they have not mentioned the kinds of things that he is accused of here.
Em has always been nice to me when asking for references and such

Trin I have met you before & I think you're amazing. However there have been too many women whom are hurt & this needs to be put to a halt.  

No-one will believe them - I have heard this a couple of times. That it would be pointless to seek help/speak up due to Ems "great" reputation. His white knights will chime in & so will he under different username he uses to write false reviews.  

Getting the pop corns out.

Using an alias immediately leads me to question your credibility right off the bat. If you are sure of your accusations you should have no problem whatsoever taking full responsibility for what you are presenting to readers here.

Two people I have met and trust have defended Em. I have worked with Em and been very happy. The ladies I have met through Em don't seem to be in distress.

... is true. Which means that several women have stopped working with Em and have been injured--mentally, career-wise, financially--by Em as a result.  

I agree with Riley, and have not found cause, though I have had my eyes and ears open, to think otherwise.

Majority know nothing about TER. A few are brand new and barely know what boards are. I'm backing off the thread due to work & can reply tomorrow. There's nothing wrong with trying to help. Contacting LE has already been done before posting here. Not only by me but a few others.

Its one of those "a first time for everything" moments for you huh... So instead of voicing your thoughts- you're  cool w/sitting back & watching it all unfold, ok I get that & for this I agree....
A topic such as this -only the facts matter, well that's my opinion anyway

They are scared. Of LE just as much as Em.

And nothing about you!

... of my questions.  I asked several questions. How about the others?

I worked with Em for over a year and a half and found the experience to mutually benifical and positive. I started booking my own appointments in December and Em was beyond helpful and supportive in helping me through the transition process. I have never once found her to be greedy, vindictive or controling.  

....yes, the OP was riddled with errors that made it difficult  to  read. But that doesn't negate the message. I could pick apart nearly every post for a variety  of grammatical errors - even my own - but  is that what this is about?

Lots of make-up sex?  

Is there a hole in the bottom?  

Use of an alias is common practice in such matters.  In criminal complaints an accuser of sexual misconduct is rarely identified. Identity has no bearings on the facts.  

THAT was Solely people's ASS-umptions!

If you have a complaint or a problem with this individual speak in facts and not rumors.I have used this service (him or her who cares) and not had any problem.

Of course you wouldn't  have a problem  with him. Your relationship with him is nowhere near the same. He has no leverage over you. Doesn't need to collect rent and doesn't control your schedule (i.e., income).  In fact, it is he who needs you. He needs your money.  You don't interact with him in person

Clients were allowed and encouraged to believe he was a woman. At first Em used to write in the persona of the provider, and that was crazy-making.  He hasn't done that to my knowledge for a while, but I have some relatively recent auto and form replies addressing me as "Sweetie" with kisses to finish.  

The problem with this post is reporting second hand information as fact. To trash someone's reputation by making allegations, where you are not an injured party is a stretch. I don't believe we resolve disputes or grievances in real life in this manner.

007hmbhg,

Outing? No - the response in my inbox is enormous. Girls who will not post public due to fear & or being over the situation. 11 have reached out & even more clients - that speaks volumes. Providers who have been hurt emotionally or dealt with his bull. I will not continue to debate with anyone. I know the truth & others do as well. I will continue in every way to make it known & to help those in need

...it from another you've been messing around...

-- Modified on 5/21/2016 5:56:09 AM

I have never used one and won't give out personal info. The choice here is the aggrieved party should be making the complaints. The logic here is if the alleged victims are protecting the alleged abuser, the problem never gets resolved. As the old saying goes, don't believe anything you hear, and half of what you see.

Your bias is glaring. He uses a feminine pseudonym. He used to send hugs and kisses (XOXO). He didn't  use a name like Pat or Chris. He chose to use a name that would make clients think he is a female. Just as I know no females named John, Mark, or Tony, I know no males name Em.

I tend to believe the info I personally see and can process using my own experience and intuition.

Roxanne, I have seen you a few times. We will have to somewhat agree to disagree on this. I am not convicting Em, and I am not endorsing the allegations.  But I HAVE talked to a NUMBER  of  girls  who  work  for Em. Over the years I have heard similar stories from a couple of these ladies. This was their personal experience. I heard eerily similar experiences how they were initiated into they hobby.... demonstrating skills and being put to the test. And stories of follow-ups where new pics were taken or rent collection.  There was no reason for them to lie to me during those separate conversations. As I wrote elsewhere in this thread, an abuser does not abuse everyone. An abuser is an opportunist and will prey on the vulnerabilities of the victim.

Quite often issues of this nature ARE brought out by third parties because the offended party is too embarrassed  or afraid to make the claim.  Isn't that the reason  we always tell people to tell someone? Tell a friend

Nice chest pounding. I can double your numbers. Have over 80 reviews. Seen well over 40 of Em's  girls for a long time. Big deal. And unlike many, I write honest and objective reviews regardless who the girl is, whom she works for, or what other reviewers have written. Big deal. What does any of that have to do with the subject matter?  

First of all what difference does it make if a scheduler is male or female?  In my opinion none whatsoever.
 
Second, can Santa really deliver toys to every boy and girl in the world in a 24 hour period?  Of course not, he has helpers.  
So do you really think Em/M has the time or inclination to answer every email enquiry?  If it makes you feel any better it's likely that you have been in contact with a female "Em" elf and not a dude.  You should assume you are never corresponding with the actual provider.

Since I'm not in P4P to mainly talk to the ladies about their troubles, I don't know as much as others.  

About all you contributed here.

...by someone using an alias, especially information that could potentially harm another's source of income, is never credible nor reliable.

...scheduler and not the Provider that this is really true. I've had a few cases in which I'm setting up an appointment and I'm informed that I'm working with the Provider's assistant. No problem. But, after meeting the Provider, I get a sneaking suspicion that I was dealing directly with her from the start. I believe some women use the facade of a scheduler to assist them in making possibly tough decisions regarding approving or not approving a fella for an appointment. I've also had times when I've been flirtatious with a scheduler whose behavior led me to believe she was female but, in retrospect, made me wonder if it was a male all along.  

So if what you are saying about use of an alias, and hurting someone potential income.
When  a DA presents a case in court, and is using a UC or CI  information, they will not divulge the name of the UC identity, nor a CI. yet often parties are criminally charged, which leads to a conviction of the charged individual. Correct ?

...the rest of your post makes no sense. You sayin' that the DA's gonna try me for postin' nuthin' but the trooth on this board?! For Real Crackuh??!!

You have no reviews and no board history before you started this thread.  This is a pattern we've seen many times before over the years, where someone appears suddenly and makes various accusations against someone else.  The question then becomes who to believe.  I put very little to no stock in someone with your lack of history.  And no one I see in this thread who does have a significant history has agreed with you.

You speak highly of Em your "favourite scheduler" in nearly every single review. Interesting - I'll leave the rest up to the public to see where I'm coming from.  

NO, don't misinterpret the post, I compared what you said in your post, against that of what often happens in a court room.
In your post, it was stated that making false allegations against someone can hurt / damage their
present and future potential income. I agree with this statement.  

Umm, Vorlon, FYI.
There is an individual who has a significant posting history on this board, OTB.
In his response, he has stated, that he has second hand information, of the allegations made by the OP.

Here we go again...  just because one uses an alias s/he cannot be believed.  That is such crap.  Some people have sticks up their ass to think that and think they are king of the board and protector of the ladies.  There are plenty of reasons for a person to use an alias.  Plenty.  And this is one of them.

wait...before I continue I need to go get more beer...honestly, and cigarettes.  This should be fun!  See you soon drummie and fellow turds!

You have reviews under other names as well?

No schnikes sherlock...

OP...early riser as I am...I happened to see your "original post" the other day and it was far more interesting.  I keep re-reading it vs the discussion so far.  You can feel free to reach out if you want.  I have no interest other than interest.  Vet me.  Spank me.  I have a case of beer, two packs of smokes, I'm here all night.

... that question. It's easy for you to find out who they are, just as I did. Have you tried asking them this question, to find the truth?  Or do you prefer to toss questions like this out there to see what (or who) they hit, without doing basic research to get to the truth?

Yes they can go to LE.  Providers are no longer seen as the criminal but the victim.

JFK, Jimmy Hoffa, Area 51, ... all mysteries, all never going to get "solved" or get everyone to agree/believe.  Just like this shit show.

None of them has supported these claims. That's five women. Five.

it's ok if you get some F'in help.

It's not very specific.  I've heard stories about how some providers were recruited into the business as well and some of those practices can be very deceitful and/or brutal.  If OTB is referring to Em, it's certainly not clear that his source is any different than the OPs.  We are still left with a claim from someone never heard from before.

The fact that your handle is already an alias is why it is fair to question why someone is using yet another alias.  The answer is they don't want their regular handle known.  Why?  Yes, it is possible the alias user want to avoid retaliation.  It's also quite possible that the alias user is intentionally causing trouble because they have an axe to grind with the person   How to decide?  All we have to go on is the history of the poster.  In this case, nothing.  From what I've seen in my time here, that's a strong sign of someone with an axe to grind.

But when others provide similar information, it's fairly reasonable to think there's maybe something to it.

-- Modified on 5/22/2016 12:49:02 AM

So what is this? The Senate of the Roman Empire?   YOU will decide who is credible or not based on how many posts they have or their tenure here? That is just effing ridiculous.

...doesn't factor into this???  Unbelievable.  So if you're part of the clique, then all's good.   Pretty sad and pathetic that you bow to such people.  Very sad.  

I know these providers did at one time too: Whitney Cohen, Almond Joy.  

All accusers have an axe to grind.

It is amazing that your list is so short for someone in the know.
On top of that more than one of the ladies on your short list is not with EM so you are now potentially causing damage to the lively hood of more than one not associated with your target.
READY -- SHOOT --AIM

During sessions - purposefully?

Suppose everything you say is true.  The question becomes "what is the best way to stop it"?

Yes I had to edit beyond belief lol. I have not replied to any private messages due to the unknown if my handle will be uncovered.  

probably every massage scheduler uses the same system right!?  You know how hard it is to change the name at the bottom of an email right!?  That list more than likely contains 95% of massage providers that use a scheduler.I am sure there are a rare few that don't but IF this is a problem, it should be pretty easy to fix.  See ONLY self scheduled providers.

...name, a board handle, a board alias and the significance each has to one's identity. I'm sorry you've chosen to champion this ignorance. And, I'm flummoxed at your feeling of inferiority toward me. King of the Board?!  I really don't post very much compared to many others so that's not possible. Protector of the Ladies? Thank you. I don't believe you when you say that and I know you don't believe yourself when you say that but I do have a tendency to act like a gentleman. God knows that there are very few women who bother to post on this board anymore because of people like you who choose to denigrate rather than encourage their participation. You don't make this board better by your participation.

It is YOU who shows ignorance and and the inability to understand what is written and to think.  No wonder you are easily flummoxed.  So let me take this very slowly, point by point for you:

"All accusers have an axe to grind. "

True..... I'm sure the beer is helping you read this!

-- Modified on 5/22/2016 9:47:05 AM

Not claiming to be in the know, actually the opposite. My goal is to compile a list of providers that use this guy. Agencies and P411 hold our personal data and we know that when we book. This guy seems to be holding our data and we don't know which providers he is linked to. No harm in revealing who the providers are so we can all make informed choices whether we want to visit them. As I said, if a provider does not use this guy, then certainly correct the list.

I just wanted to chime in on such lies and let everyone know where I stand on this topic!

Everyone can cum to their own conclusions based on their own research rather than hearsay, etc.  

I recall when the Bill Cosby scandal broke.  Most rushed to his defense.  It seemed impossible to them. Many knew and worked with him.  Many still defend him.  They ask -- why didn't you come forward?  Why didn't you go to the police?  You are liars!

Jenessa Skye now uses Cindy?

We contact them???

What if some longtime ladies are part of the "bad guy's group"?  
In this post, that would be Em and his real and fake names.

Very well said LP.

atch the ESPN Duke lacrosse 30 for 30.  Not to take sides in regards to this, but to show how "stories" can change, people can make HUGE mistakes, and don't be too quick to judge.  

... between this thread and the Cosby affair is that many women who had first-hand knowledge of what happened came forward publicly with their stories.  And then serious action was taken against Cosby.    

...name, a board handle, a board alias and the significance each has to one's identity. I'm sorry you've chosen to champion this ignorance. And, I'm flummoxed at your feeling of inferiority toward me. King of the Board?!  I really don't post very much compared to many others so that's not possible. Protector of the Ladies? Thank you. I don't believe you when you say that and I know you don't believe yourself when you say that but I do have a tendency to act like a gentleman. God knows that there are very few women who bother to post on this board anymore because of people like you who choose to denigrate rather than encourage their participation. You don't make this board better by your participation.  
 
I am so glad I'm not like you but I do find joy in diversity so, keep on with your hating ways!  :

Come on now everyone knows there's only one King of the Board...It's (NOT ME)...

your posts still make half sense fratboy

You know where to find me OTB.  Sharing is caring

was an awesome post grounded in reality.  Thanks for sharing

I know he schedules and screens for many massage gals.
I know that I have had contact with him in regards to references.
I know that, generally, he's been nice in the limited communications I've had with him.

I've shared a few emails with him doing reference checks but that's about it.

How do we (all of us here) know how many of these e-mails, by providers AND aliases both, are controlled and answered by "Em" on this thread???

Then it's not the beer, it's the lack of intelligence.  Sorry to confuse you drunky!!

Thanks for sharing! OTB, you have a fan and someone likes your leather cheerio!! hahaha

no balls to accept a response.  Good luck in the future son.  You'll need it.

Lol... I am not EM nor have I meet EM... He is my go to scheduler and puts up with me....  There are other girls out there and know I'm not EM...  So keep telling your lies...  Do you have any truth in anything you post?  

Leigh-Ann has never worked with Em. She is as I independent as they come!  
 

Thanks!  Yep, it's all about luck!!

Replying for Ms. Chayse?

For example, we may never truly know the motives of the OP.  They may be pure... or not.  

"Pulls off condoms during sessions?" -- that's a lie.  More interesting than the lie is how deep you are into all this shit, and the level of your vitriol.  Wonder who you are to be so angry and what I or anyone else have done to offend you?  

Well of course you pull off condoms...when you're done! We all do. Otherwise, we'd have however number of condoms stuck on our dicks!

Too bad TER does not allow them to be posted here any more.

...and WKs and clique.  Nothing much impartial about that invective is there?

I replied because he never said that other ladies couldn't speak up about the list. I didn't think that I was doing anything wrong. I am sorry if I offended you in some way by letting people know that she doesn't have a scheduler.  

And according to them the last of the Roman Empire collapsed in 1453.  So, I feel it is safe to say this is not the Roman Empire Senate.

No apologies necessary.

Dim.

Thank you. All of this is breaking my heart because it's just further evidence that the hobby has changed and not in a positive direction.  

that by (his or her) persistence that the OP has an ax to grind, I would never decide on a persons guilt or innocence on rumor or insinuation.

I knew that long before I ever saw you the first time.
It is not a secret to many out there that EM is not a female.

Impartial seems to be quite evident here. Hardly an invective cupcake.

But dim might be a little too bright.  maybe 1/4 watt.

...of himself, and his posts don't come across that way.  Unlike you and other WKs, OTB doesn't resort to name calling and chest thumping.  Nice try at diversion.  Wish I could ignore you, but your posts humor me.

she prove right here, right now, that you pull of condoms?  Short of a video, that can't be proven.  So she said he said.   Hmmmm....

You had to check Wikipedia to learn that the Roman Empire no longer exists?  The metaphor obviously eluded you.  (Wikipedia that and see if what I wrote makes sense.)

letters if they don't recognize there is one and only one king of the board.  Personally, I have Drummie currently #3 on my do not trust a thing he says crew.  Power couple rounds out the top of the pops...there's a few other's that couldn't quite manipulate their way into getting into the medal winners but they sure do continue to try...

Paternity test.

gloving little wong because I don't want him to catch a cold...think "the boy in the bubble".

.... more like a V swab.

1.  The Wikipedia thing was sarcasm.  I'm sure you've heard of it.