Has anyone actually seen Julia? She is on the ad board and BP on Tuesday.
She has nice pics.
She has 3 questionable reviews. 2 in August, 1 from last year in msp.
She advertises JuliaVIPChicago,  
She is not P411, nor Eros, nor any TER reviews in Chicago.
I tried to see her, she asked for name, age, and occupation. I gave her p411, age, and general occupation.
She provided location (Bloomington)
She by text indicates she will not answer her phone, she only texts and does email.  
She also asked what P411 was?
She agreed to $200 at hh rate.
Kept texting asking me for more information
I chose not to go in, seemed like a possible LE set up in my opinion.
Curious on others POV.

thx

END OF MESSAGE

END OF MESSAGE

Now someone he thinks is LE has his P411 information. This lack of discretion and security is the very reason Gina tells everyone to only give their information using the system.

Her previous name is Brianna.  You would not believed this text she sent me after I seen her and told her that at her rate ($300/hr) I was expecting better.  Her ads has different height, but the text descriptions are similar.  She's no where near her ad pictures.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=23324

which hardly matters because you did not review her unless you did so under the luc handle in which case you provided a far far outlier review.  
By the way psycho dick, would you enlighten us on the evidence (other than similar text) such as image match, phone match, website match) that she is Brianna.

You think I fucking have time to review every chick I see?  I'm guessing there's over 40+ chicks that I have not even bother to tell TER my stories.  I've debated about reviewing "Brianna", but after her psycho rambling texts to me, I've decided not to.  Hint Brianna is NOT 5'7", unless she happens to wear 3-4" heels.

When I saw "Julia's"ad, I called then texted her about making an appointment, and before I confirmed the appointment I asked "Julia" if she was "Brianna" because they look alike to me.  Her replied back to me was(Yes, I still have this text message on my phone) "Just bc we suck small cocks for a living doesn't mean we know each other".  Flash back music please, that's exactly what "Brianna" accused me of "having a small cock".  I think my cock is average size, but what are the odds of two chicks accusing me of having small cocks?  Probably same odd as winning powerball is my guess.

This is what I get accused of when I'm paying good $$, try to inform this community.  Next time I'm just going to let you pay your own hard earn $$ and deal w/your own psycho chick.

Arrgh, TER making me delete what I really thinking of you.  If you have PM, I'll PM it to you.
  -- Modified on 8/27/2014 12:51:11 PM

You outed Julia's incall location with specifics in your post and endangered her safety. I had to scramble to get TER to edit it out without drawing any additional attention to it.

Like others have already stated, giving your P411 ID to someone you have not verified to be a member of P411 was unwise.

-- Modified on 8/27/2014 10:14:59 PM

I had a very similar experience. Luckily I did not give her my full name and I have a hobby phone. Her reviewers seem from members who review mainly in California and two of them have reviews for  same two ladies in MN. Seems very odd that someone from Chicago and hobbies in MN wouldn't have reviews from members in Chicago & MN. She never set up any appointment with me, lucky me. If it is LE then they have gone quite far for setting up year old reviews, website and BP ad.

That's all you have to connect the two providers??? Bless your heart!!!  

I'm not stating that it's a classy thing to say but I've definitely heard many, many females say that about guys; it's a generic insult used on ANY guy ... It is generally used to mind-fuck a guy because men love their dicks (as they should ... Daily ;D) and want to consider them NOT small.  

That comment alone does not, in and of itself, mean they are one in the same ... Just as all the "small penis" comments I have heard over the years are not regarding just one guy.  

Please be careful when stating "fact"  

TER should have an age and maturity limit

-- Modified on 8/28/2014 2:36:06 PM

Now this is the kind of trash talk that has been missing. I like it. Thanks guys and gals since
I have been texting w Julia but will pass now, I knew the pics were bogus.

Did you missed the part on both website that has almost exact wordings when they described themselves? Voices sounds similar to me, but how am I going to post that here, since I don't record my conversations.  However the text on my phone is a different story.