http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1356467

Max score can only be an 8 yet with only his
second review (1st from Minn.), gave her a 9???

Special privileges scoring rules for him???

Of the others guys that reviewed her, the
total amount reviews for them is 130+9+19+60=218.  

From TER review guidelines:

In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session:
Kisses With Tongue, ----on her profile
Bare-Back Blow Job,---- on her profile
Really Bi,
and Anal Sex, or
More than One Guy. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum.

The way he keeps talking about the other reviews and how they must have done something wrong to have ended up with such a disappointing result makes me question the validity of the review, particularly as he has only one other review.  It "smells" to me like one that was written deliberately to counteract the effect of the poor reviews.

...either a major fabrication or an extreme case of YMMV.

I don't really care if that one great review is genuine or not... it's an outlier, not consistent with other reviews, hence it tells me "Danger, Will Robinson!" with the Red Alert klaxon going off.

If a provider has typically positive reviews but one bad one, that too is an outlier and I disregard it.

Yeah.. Still not willing to be the TOFTT guy on this one... Her pics are hot but way too many inconsistencies for this to be valid.

Which, BTW, has always struck me as an almost ridiculous list...  If I think back to the top 1%, the very best 2 or 3 experiences I ever had...  I don't ever remember giving a rat's ass about whether they were bi, or did multiple guys...  It is a completely arbitrary list of things the original founder of TER liked the most, but they have little influence on what makes a date simply unforgettable.  I recently had one of the most sensual times of my entire life with someone who, if I wrote reviews, I could have only given an 8.

someone with an extreme case of YMMV or perhaps everyone else was wrong

I go by the law of average.

If a data point is more than a few standard deviations away from the mean then it should be considered an anomaly and disregarded.

I'm calling bullshit anyway for same reasons already listed plus the fact the reviewer kept repeating himself over and over again then to top it off posts on here to take a dig at someone and call attention to his new review.

The "General" quite lengthy.  I thought those are supposed to be short and sweet and very generic.  This review (and his other one --I read that too) is like a dissertation.  Seems to go way overboard to point out differences of other reviews.  Also noted that the last review from this person was about 5-1/2 years ago....

Her website is authored/hosted what-ever by nameserver ns3.infstudios.com

Guess who's other website is authored/hosted by this company?  The only other lady this deadbeat (Mr. NEOINOAKLEY) reviewed...... SILA STAR!   http://www.silastar.com

The nameserver ns3.infstudios.com manages the following domains :

1.  amykaden.com ******************
2.  band.........com
3.  silastar.com   *******************
4.  sista..........i.com
5.  thelittlewed..........com

The websites are even set up VERY similar, check it out!
http://www.amykaden.com
http://www.silastar.com


Mr. NEOINOAKLEY is a scam!
He gave SILA STAR!   http://www.silastar.com her first review and now he is doing some clean up for Amy. Well you know what they say, a friend in need is a friend indeed! I wonder if he was the one who made both their websites too!


-- Modified on 2/28/2013 9:10:17 AM

Totally agree....EOM

He also has a whitelist from a well respected Mpls provider that he has not reviewed. Still, it seems like a total fluff job.

Maybe we should have these guys in the crows nest
approving the reviews from now on...



-- Modified on 2/28/2013 5:41:04 PM

I think a 2 on he rreviews would be accurate, or a 1 perhaps. I mean no action on first date?
What the fuck?