Here is a question for hobbyists: Have you ever visited a higher price provider ($350/hr or higher) and had a better experience than a provider in the $200 - $300 price range.
Mpls has had a couple of higher priced providers visit that were very good looking in my opinion. Curious to see how busy they were based upon all the other options available.
I evalutate reviews, pictures, then price. So if I decide that I would like to see a provider I am pretty sure I will leave a satisfied customer, regardless of price, with YMMV exception always a possibility.
Having said that, I can not say the times I spent paying a bit more, $$$$ were any better then the times I spent $$$. I will say the times I have gone cheap bastard have been no where near as fun as the times I have spent 250 - 300.
I travel to San Fran. They have providers that are in the 800 to 1000.00 per hour range. Gotta tell ya they all have great reviews, and the best body and face money can buy. I have been so satisified with the 300 - 400 dollar encounters that I don't think I could ever justify the extra bucks.
Contrary to recent threads, I have found NO correlation between price and quality, but have decided to steer clear of that mess. My hit/miss record at 200-250 is better than at 300, and my hit/miss record at 350 and up is slightly worse. I've only ever had 3 dreadful "I wish I wasn't here" appointments, one was 300, two were 350. Three best experiences ever were all 250-ish, but 4th and 5th were 350. Also, been stood up quite a few times over the years at 300, has never happened below 300.
I feel the best buys in providers are, providers with experience. eighteen year olds never quite fill the bill, reguardless of how hard their bodies are. There attitute usually needs some adjustment as well.
I agree, doorjammer! Thank heaven those experienced ladies. Mrs. Robinson has nothing on these ladies!!!
I tend to agree with you OZap on the correlation between price and quality although the price for some of the local providers is perhaps overvalued and inflated as compared to the touring gals and their bevy of talent and services. There are in my opinion an A-List of local talent that can ask for the 300+ fee and justify the cost. There is far more B rated talent that ask for the +300 and don't live up to the hype....as shown in their individual TER reviews. I don't particularly enjoy taking one for the team at $3 bills or more without doing a review search. $200-250 is tolerable yet the infamous YMMV acronym tends to fill the pages far more frequently than not.
I can't say that I am a solid local talent fan with the influx of beautiful and varied talent passing through the City. Although, I have been disappointed far less in the local talent by sticking to the reputable and solid providers. But then again, its only an opinion and we all do what we do for fun and pleasure.
With the exception of the traveling FL supermodels, I haven’t noticed much correlation between price and service. Locally, with a bit of searching, you can get the same bang for less bucks = more bang for the buck with lower priced providers. Pricing, after all, is pretty much arbitrary. Any girl can ask any price she wants.
There is terrible to great service available at all price points. It only seems like more quality providers are available at the higher price points because such girls are way more visible and have loads of reviews. A lot of lower priced talent doesn’t even qualify to be listed on TER because they lack web sites.
I keep hearing “you get what you pay for,” but I just don’t see it, UNLESS what you are really looking to purchase is a cash-based pretend relationship—complete with many of the same hassles you get in a real relationship. I always thought that the whole purpose of seeing a provider was to have all of the fun with none of the hassle. I find it rather ironic that so many guys are willing to actually pay extra for the kind strings they claim to be seeking refuge from in the first place.
Lower profile/lower cost providers offer more discretion. They rarely compile and/or distribute a client’s personal information, pretty much keep to themselves, couldn’t care less what other providers their clients see, and don’t tap their database (see never compiled one in the first place) to solicit business.
I agree that the super-hot babes from FL are a cut above, but I don’t think there is any difference between the $300 and $350 FL girls. I think the agencies are planning to raise the prices of all their girls soon, and are just testing the waters by pricing some of their girls at $350 to see how it impacts sales. Once they’ve confirmed that our market will bear it, they’ll raise them all up to $350, and start testing the $400 price point with a few of the girls, and so on, and so on. For that reason, I think it would be prudent to stick with the $300 FL girls to prevent inflation—especially since the $300 FL girls, by most accounts, are as good or better than the $350 offerings.
-- Modified on 10/28/2003 8:47:30 PM
I also see no correlation between price and satisfaction. I would much rather see 3 girls at $$ than 2 girls at $$$. Either way I have spent $$$$$$.