Minnesota

What is a good word to describe a reviewer who ...
agrkej 18 Reviews 330 reads
posted
1 / 26
knotsaway 38 Reviews 560 reads
posted
2 / 26

"Asshole!"  This happened last year to a provider I know pretty well, a real sweetheart of a lady.  I happened to ask her about it, because I know her boundaries (or thought I did) and was surprised when I saw the review.  She asked me what the acronym used in the review for the alleged act means--I told her, and she got really upset.  Turns out it was the second time such a thing had happened to her in the space of a few days.  She said she was wondering why she started getting lots of emails inquiring about that "service"... which is way outside her boundaries.  Unfortunately, in this case, the perpetrator never fixed the review.  

Beyond that, I often see reviews that contain fabrications.  How do I know?  Because I know the ladies being reviewed, and know what their boundaries are.

One thing hobbyists can do for ladies they know well and have a close relationship with... watch their backs.  I've found some of them don't read their reviews that closely, or don't read them right away.  If I see something in a review for such a lady that looks suspicious, I alert her about it via her preferred contact channel.  I know that some providers look out for each other in this way also.  If we all look out for each other, the hobby will be a lot more fun.  :-)

elanmontage See my TER Reviews 555 reads
posted
3 / 26

say "clueless"....  and "dangerous".... especially if they don't fix it!!!!!    Fixing it.... well, then, it is a misunderstanding most likely and forgivable.

DJ1985 21 Reviews 357 reads
posted
4 / 26

If he corrected the review he may have been exaggerating his experiance or just been unaware what really happened to him, some ladies are just so overwhelmingly good you don't even really know what happened to you. Could be unaware his review may cause problems for a provider he truely enjoyed. May be an ass that figured he messed with the wrong lady and it was in his best interest to correct it. I prefer to think the best of people but I've been proven wrong many times before.

elanmontage See my TER Reviews 409 reads
posted
5 / 26

ad thing is the provider is at the mercy of the unaware individual client who may be out of town and simply made a mistake (granted - not a well thought out thing to do).  

sometimes the man just runs away with his pleasure and loses his temporary sense of how powerful words are and how much they can implicate and misguide.  not a good excuse; but it can and does happen.  TER leaves it to the reviewer to have the final say... but if they're unavailable... well, SOL indeed is the provider.  This is unfortunate.  

Some clients have the sense to know that many exaggerate on reviews.  They are right to do so.  

Now, in the case of Knotsaway describing that asshat... that he was made aware of the problem and still left that provider exposed to others buying into the description that is either "inaccurate" or "private"... I hear some providers that are not FS might be more YMMV where others have a clear boundary in their services... well, that particular client is very irresponsible, uncaring, dangerous and not an asset to this community, but a liability

brilove See my TER Reviews 354 reads
posted
6 / 26
belindabell See my TER Reviews 352 reads
posted
7 / 26
Derpdydoo 78 Reviews 442 reads
posted
8 / 26

I will discount a review that goes against the grain.  But, that doesn't mean I'll call it a fabrication, unless there are other details that seem off.  Describing the location incorrectly or perhaps other clues.  But, being the recipient of a lady who offers me FS and most will be lucky to get a HE.  I know if i were ever stupid enough to post about it she'd get nothing but trouble.  I just get to smile and laugh with every new review that says she offered DIY at best.

1to1networker 384 reads
posted
9 / 26

Same story here. I NEVER post about FS providers in the AMP realm.

vorlon 119 Reviews 349 reads
posted
10 / 26

That he fixed the review means it might have been a mistake on his part.  I've heard of more than a few instances where a guy was getting a CBJ that was so good that he thought it was BBBJ.

Of course, if the review was deliberately written incorrectly then that is reprehensible.

MsDynamite See my TER Reviews 294 reads
posted
11 / 26

Would you expect anything else from me? :D

Posted By: breadmaker
falsely writes and emphasizes in a review that a provider provided a service that she is explicitly and personally opposed to doing? She then gets email bombed with requests for appts.  
 He then edits the review which she spends the day straightening out emails?  
   
   
 

TrulyMsMocha See my TER Reviews 351 reads
posted
12 / 26
Pollenbroker 24 Reviews 332 reads
posted
13 / 26

First, there's a question whether the description was innocent or not...if the provider's conduct was a departure from an accurate profile, then the reviewer should confirm with her that he can portray that in the review.  Perhaps he thinks he's getting a BBBJ when it's not, and he's not aware of it for some reason....if he doesn't check, then he's guilty.

So if he's guilty, either by not checking or by deliberately mischaracterizing the provider's conduct, it's an act of misogyny and  abuse.  It shouldn't be tolerated.

2late 180 Reviews 292 reads
posted
14 / 26

Knotsaway......Several posts down you admitted you let a provider edit your own review of her.  On the surface that seemed rather 'whiteknightish' of you to say the least.  I then checked out some of the reviews you had written and decided that you seemed to be pretty honest in what you wrote. So maybe, without knowing the specifics of this case, we owe this reviewer the benefit of the doubt.

Posted By: knotsaway
"Asshole!"  This happened last year to a provider I know pretty well, a real sweetheart of a lady.  I happened to ask her about it, because I know her boundaries (or thought I did) and was surprised when I saw the review.  She asked me what the acronym used in the review for the alleged act means--I told her, and she got really upset.  Turns out it was the second time such a thing had happened to her in the space of a few days.  She said she was wondering why she started getting lots of emails inquiring about that "service"... which is way outside her boundaries.  Unfortunately, in this case, the perpetrator never fixed the review.    
   
 Beyond that, I often see reviews that contain fabrications.  How do I know?  Because I know the ladies being reviewed, and know what their boundaries are.  
   
 One thing hobbyists can do for ladies they know well and have a close relationship with... watch their backs.  I've found some of them don't read their reviews that closely, or don't read them right away.  If I see something in a review for such a lady that looks suspicious, I alert her about it via her preferred contact channel.  I know that some providers look out for each other in this way also.  If we all look out for each other, the hobby will be a lot more fun.  :-)

macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 357 reads
posted
15 / 26

Inconsiderate..braggart..one in the same..

Posted By: breadmaker
falsely writes and emphasizes in a review that a provider provided a service that she is explicitly and personally opposed to doing? She then gets email bombed with requests for appts.  
 He then edits the review which she spends the day straightening out emails?  
   
   
 

Jackieblu See my TER Reviews 312 reads
posted
16 / 26

It would be hard to call if its not mentioned what said activity was that was way out of character for said provider? sorry have been away from desk for awhile. ?

knotsaway 38 Reviews 313 reads
posted
17 / 26

... in the room, with this provider who was boiling mad and obviously very upset about what two different clients had recently written about her in their reviews.  They were totally inconsistent with all of her other reviews and with my multiple dates with her.

So my inclination is to believe her rather than give these reviewers "the benefit of the doubt."

I dealt with the situation with as much compassion and empathy as I could.  I don't consider that "whiteknightish", but simply treating someone with the consideration and respect they deserve--as I would like to be treated if it were me in this situation.

And, I am glad to let ANY provider see my review of her before I publish it, and ask for changes.  In fact, I'm surprised more providers don't ask their clients to see their reviews before they're published... it would avoid problems like those discussed in this thread.

2late 180 Reviews 294 reads
posted
18 / 26

You are right that I was not there so the best you could do is use your own judgment. I guess I've never gotten that close to any provider.  But letting providers edit your reviews is inappropriate IMO.

Posted By: knotsaway
... in the room, with this provider who was boiling mad and obviously very upset about what two different clients had recently written about her in their reviews.  They were totally inconsistent with all of her other reviews and with my multiple dates with her.  
   
 So my inclination is to believe her rather than give these reviewers "the benefit of the doubt."  
   
 I dealt with the situation with as much compassion and empathy as I could.  I don't consider that "whiteknightish", but simply treating someone with the consideration and respect they deserve--as I would like to be treated if it were me in this situation.  
   
 And, I am glad to let ANY provider see my review of her before I publish it, and ask for changes.  In fact, I'm surprised more providers don't ask their clients to see their reviews before they're published... it would avoid problems like those discussed in this thread.

knotsaway 38 Reviews 251 reads
posted
20 / 26

Why do you think it's inappropriate to allow the subject of the review to see it before it's published?

If the provider asks for any changes, it's still my decision whether to make the changes and publish, not make the changes and publish, or not publish the review at all.  If the changes don't significantly affect my take on the provider and the session, I'd have no problem accepting them.  That's what happened the one time a provider saw my review before I published it.  But if she would ask for changes that are counter to my take on the experience, I'd first try to reach agreement with her on the text such that it accurately reflected my opinion.  Failing that, I'd have to decide whether to publish it anyway, without the changes that affect the essence of the review, or not publish at all.  I've never faced that decision, so it would depend on the situation.

quoderat1790 28 Reviews 292 reads
posted
21 / 26

Agree. I've done the same thing with a favorite provider. I pointed out that a recent review mentioned things she is adamant about not doing. I don't know if she followed up, but I did want to let her know that was out there.

bigdell 81 Reviews 232 reads
posted
22 / 26

First of all let me say that I agree with most of the nasty stuff that has been said about a guy that would do this.  When the lady contacted me with her concerns about the review I started the process with TER to let me edit it.  (they don't normally allow that) I got the OK and have changed it.  I have told the lady I am sorry and she has accepted my apology.  She told me she never thought I did it on purpose.  There were two issues in the review.  One was a poor choice of words on my part.  Even when I proof read it I didn't realize someone could take it the way they wanted, instead of the way it was meant.  The way some people took it was never mentioned in the review.  The second issue came from differences in her definition of an act and mine.  It's that simple, no need to read anything else into it.  Again my apologies to the lady.  bigdell

vorlon 119 Reviews 333 reads
posted
23 / 26

They harass or blackmail guys who write reviews of which the provider disagrees with.  Most providers don't do this of course but some do and I fear that generally allowing providers to see reviews before they are published would only encourage this sort of bad behavior; in fact some providers get quite insistent on guys doing exactly as you do, even to the point of wanting the guy to write the review in their presence or telling them what to say.

As with reviews of people in any other line of business, the primary purpose of reviews here is to help out others considering seeing the escort.  FWIW, I have never sent my review to an escort ahead of publication time; the most I have done is once in a while clarify a possible point of confusion, such as in a YMMV situation.

knotsaway 38 Reviews 247 reads
posted
24 / 26

It's never happened to me, probably because I screen providers pretty carefully before I see them.  But if it did happen, it would only happen once.  And I'd mention the harassment or blackmail in my review, and here in the General Discussion--and name names.  I won't put up with that kind of shit from anyone.

Nor would I put up with being forced to write a review in the provider's presence.  I'd be out the door, never to return.  And again, would mention the provider's behavior in my review and in the TER discussion forum.

I have had requests from ladies before, related to things we did together that are not on their regular menus.  And they didn't want every client to think that those services were generally available.  They were not demands, but polite requests.  

If this kind of behavior is common among providers, all it means is that too many guys put up with it.  I think there's a huge difference between harassment and blackmail over reviews, and letting the provider see a review before it's published, while retaining editorial control over it.

vorlon 119 Reviews 304 reads
posted
25 / 26

I love the ladies and what they do for us but when I read a review I want to read his account of the session, not his account possibly influenced by what she would like said about her.

knotsaway 38 Reviews 304 reads
posted
26 / 26

The only reason I would accept a change requested by a provider I'm reviewing is in one of those YMMV situations that you mentioned. I would never accept a change that significantly changes my take on the session.  

I think you are taking this way beyond the intent, which is to be sure a review is accurate while not saying too much about those YMMV situations.  I really don't see what the BFD is about doing that.

Register Now!