First it wasn't very kosher of you to post a link to her here. Its kind of on the border of iffy/ YMMV
By iffy I mean she doesn't always do what the review states and
certainly doesn't want it posted all over the place for every Lurker to see either
Some of the providers listed are also UTR status, semi retired .

This ad has only appeared on the therapeutic section.  At one time somebody posted a review of this therapist and it was removed.

One can only assume the therapist wishes NOT to be reviewed or viewed in these forums.

This whole thread should be removed in my opinion.

I she had posted in other areas like body rubs my views would differ; but she most definitely has not.

By the way, she is a perfectly wonderful legitimate therapist.  But no more.

Perhaps the mod can shed some light about its purpose.  I agree that the example in the OP's link makes no sense being used here on this board without more information about why its in that section of the reviews.  Perhaps anyone who knows this provider might alert her to this so she can file a complaint with TER.

It was hoped that hobbyists would have less reviews disapproved because of delisted providers. The logic behind it was that we spend a considerable amount of time writing and submitting reviews only to find out that said review cannot be posted because of a provider being delisted.
With this concept, less reviews would be rejected.

It was meant mainly for providers who had requested their reviews be taken down, but are still active. Some of them for reasons such as low review scores or harassing hobbyists over their review scores.

The concept or idea behind it does have some sound reasoning, but quite obviously needs to be overhauled or drastically modified.
I don't believe it has been expanded since it was first introduced, but may be in the near future.

That's about all I can tell you guys for the time being. I will not enter into a debate over it's merits or otherwise. I am just conveying what I know.