http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=216693

I saw her many months ago.  Her pics are touched up a bit, but she is a pretty gal.  The session what very business like with no sensuality and no hint of anything more.  The massage was only mediocre, so I won't even consider going back.  She seemed in a hurry.  YMMV, but that was my experience.  I couldn't post review because of her ad and services offered.

Is the phrase 'Treat Yourself' in her ad heading code for DIY?

I don't understand the rules for posting a review of a massage gal when no sex occurred. A score of 7 for performance is supposed to assume that physical sex occurred, not just in the mind of the hapless massagee.

Nice gal. Quite beautiful. Gained a few pounds below the waist since these pics. Therapeutic only to the best of my knowledge.

Therapeutic was my experience.  I was under the impression that therapeutic listings were to be not reviewed.

I did see her several months ago.  Sounded very nice on the phone and threw some subtle hints. Session was 100% therapeutic. She remained fully clothed and strategically moved and/or positioned herself to her advantage.  Rushed/cut-short session.  A very mediocre massage by therapeutic measures.  I wouldn't go back for a 1/2 price sale.  But that's just my 2 cents.  The massage room is in the back of beauty/hair salon.