I thought the OP's posting was clear enough and I didn't think it was out of line at all. Yours however seems clearly to be mean spirited. I agree with Wingman that its a highly suspicious review. Probably the only way for a new provider to gain UTR publicity without posting a public ad. It could be a self written review, or a shill review. If its accurate, who cares? IF anything, Wingman provided her more publicity for her by his post. If it weren't for her relatively high rate for a newcomer, I might have been tempted to TOFTT myself.
Alexis Hill looks nice but would be more comfortable if someone else
had some info or has seen her? Any help out there?
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=191137
Nice website, the rates of someone who's established here, but just that one review?
I know. Exactly. And I don't remember ever seeing an ad anywhere.
When you make a post like this, you suggest that there is something improper or suspicious with this posting. If you actually know of something amiss, you don't mention it.
It seems that the only issue may be that neither the provider or the reviewer are members of your club. What club? The club of self appointed experts who attack anyone who has not received their permission to post a review.
Lol...Are you serious? I'm just trying to gleen a little more information about the provider. Sometimes a hobbyist's first review tied to a provider's first review does seem a little suspicious to me, especially if I can't find where the hobbyist has ever posted anything on our discussion board. Maybe I'm getting a little cynical in my old age but that's my thought. And I don't consider myself a member of any "club" on here or anywhere else. I don't understand how you could consider my original post as an attack on anyone...and no one needs my "permission" to post a review. And I was having such a good day.....Lol
I thought the OP's posting was clear enough and I didn't think it was out of line at all. Yours however seems clearly to be mean spirited. I agree with Wingman that its a highly suspicious review. Probably the only way for a new provider to gain UTR publicity without posting a public ad. It could be a self written review, or a shill review. If its accurate, who cares? IF anything, Wingman provided her more publicity for her by his post. If it weren't for her relatively high rate for a newcomer, I might have been tempted to TOFTT myself.
It's reasonable to wonder (suspect) whether the first review is a shill when BOTH parties are new. In this arena, seems like it's safer to assume the worst until proven otherwise (verification), to wonder if it's a fake review or even LE.
It's not hostile, IMHO, to point this anomaly out.
This is a very legitimate warning. Fake reviews of new girls are not unusual. A new girl gets one or two good reviews from someone unknown but when experienced reviewers see her, then the scores drop dramatically. A while ago, some fellow actually did enough investigation to determine that there was a group of providers whose only good reviews were from the same small set of reviewers who never had reviewed anyone else. Many of us know to check the review histories of reviewers of new girls but newcomers are not likely to and a post like this is a very useful heads up that all may not be as it appears.
What the fuck does anyone know here? There could be something improper and suspicious with every posting. This has all the earmarks of a fake review. I wouldnt join any club that would have me as a member and who's giving permission to post reviews?
Agree about the rates, but don't read too much into the website. It's a template. Compare:
http://www.sweetalexishill.com/index.html
http://www.giamisaki.com/index.html
Open the reservation form and it's obvious who "borrowed" from whom.
are part of an agency? All I noticed is that they both have Sophia respond for them.
But she doesn't look like someone I'd drop $350 on- one review by a mysterious reviewer or not.
Most saavy ladies usually start out at a reasonable donation, generate some interest and a history of exceptional review scores and gradually move the $$ up to the high end.
Maybe she knows something we don't know
Both her and Gia Misaki who has a matching website claim to have a secure SSL booking form. Truth is those booking forms are not secure, you can tell because both are only http:// rather than https://. Both are requesting P411 info if available but neither can be found to have a profile on P411.
On Alexis' profile page - Real Photo: Yes - Photo Accurate: No
Now what is that supposed to mean?
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
