I just had a review approved a couple days ago for a touring provider I saw downtown the beginning of the week.  I wrote the review right away as I thought it may help hobbyists here either decide whether to see her or not.  The review was posted on Washington DC Review board but not Minnesota.  I asked why, and was told that's the way it is...reviews only get posted to Provider's home city and not 'where the action takes place'.  Sounds strange to me.

They do have a knack for making it difficult at times. There is obviously more than one person responsible for analyizing them, and depending on who you get seems to determine how lax or strict they'll be on the rules. What's good enough in one review, might not cut it for the next.    

Shorten it to a laundry list of acronyms and bland, generic escort cliches like most others do and you'll get approved.

A couple of years ago I had a review rejected on the ground that it mentioned children.  Mind you, the context was that when I got to the incall location and was in the parking lot, there was a little kid staring at me like "wtf are you doing here?"  So I made a comment in my review that the kid made me nervous.  I thought I had phrased it to make it clear that the kid wasn't in the next room or anything, but that his happened outside.

So yeah, I think sometimes reviews get rejected for reasons that boggle the mind.