I have never left a scenario and jilted someone without compensation without a very good reason. Once was with someone who was nearly 1.5 hrs late, gave me a very shaky reason as to why he was late, and only called once (at 15 mins late) to say he was at the bank and would be there soon. This naturally brought to mind LE and I left (though I do think I could have cancelled just based on his rude lateness.) I highly doubt compensation was required in that case, but if you think so, please make your argument.
The other time I left was not due to a hobbyist- it was due to a strange situation in a hotel where someone walked in my room, uninvited (NOT a scheduled appointment) and tried talking to me. Might have been a confused client looking for someone else (he said he was looking for someone named Katie?) but also may have been LE. Yes, I left that situation, but kept my scheduled appointment at a different location later that night.
These days, if I need to cancel with very short notice, I do offer compensation - typically a fairly significant discount on the next appointment. Which is more than people give me for cancelling on short notice (I'm talking less than 8, 6, even 1hr notice). If that's selfish, so be it. As for your 'no compensation required' statement - I find that more selfish and ignorant to other people's needs and worries than anything I've said. You don't know how a cancelled appointment on extremely short notice might affect someone. However, I won't go as far as to call *you* selfish, ignorant and uncaring of people's needs.
Addressing the other part of your post: No, I did not call him a dumbass. Cite where I did. I said that there are dumbasses who do get caught up in BP stings (sorry, but going to an unreviewed bp provider in a conservative county/, shady location/etc qualifies as a dumbass move to me) but as you said, he didn't do that. So the statement I made doesn't apply to him- we are in agreement there. I'm not sure why you are applying it to him. I wrote out a general example of a dumb move that gets people in trouble to highlight the reality of what LE is looking for, and what they probably aren't . I even apologized if it came off as more condescending than I intended. I also noted in another post that it doesn't take just being dumb to get in trouble- you can also just be incredibly unlucky. So why are you insulting me? Did you not read any of my other posts?
Also, I do not appreciate the insinuation that I don't have a regular life and a charge wouldn't mean anything to me. You know nothing about me. Trying to glean everything-- or really, pretty much anything-- about my safety practices or my attitude toward an arrest/conviction from a post about the reality of what police are looking for is very short sighted. I will ask you not to spread, or insinuate, misinformation about me. Thank you.
Posted By: mnborn80
Casey you seem somewhat selfish in your responses and reasoning. Or perhaps ignorant to other peoples needs, worries, etc.
You said that he should offer compensation to make up for it. Did you do the same in the scenarios that you left where something didnt "feel right"? Also how is he supposed to compensate her, that would then make him subject to said camera that made him not "feel right". Oh I know he could park blocks away and put on a ski mask to meet her at the door to compensate her. Perfect.
And he is not talking about a hotel. It is a brick and mortar "massage" building, so it is on them to deal with all of the people that will not go there due to a LE camera right next to the building. Yes they are aware of them, as they do in fact have eyes.
Yes you did call him a dumbass. Yet he was more of a smart(ass, if you chose) due to the fact that he found a BP provider, he went to the location of her choice, he had an I don't "feel right" moment and made a choice to not be a dumbass by possibly getting caught up in a BP sting ad.
So yeah most likely that camera is not for a big bust, though there might be some large busts at the location he wanted to go to. But as a smart hobbyist it is his right to bail if he is not comfortable being on candid camera. No compensation required.
So while a police shake up may be the only thing that happens, most of us have a regular life that what you may consider just a small inconvenience or hasse would cause a lot more damage than we desire.
-- Modified on 10/9/2013 1:51:05 PM