agree !
There are high end escorts out there you can see for a 1/2 hour session (GFE) for 200 to 225 !
The rates for FBSM are 180 to 220 range for most of his providers and 70% of the time you get a misleading pic and a rub and tug and your out the door in 40 minutes
Anybody still bothered with the EM syndicate? Has is blown over? Still concerned? WTFC
Sheen was winning...nope.
...ads that mislead, and the fake pics and fake reviews that seem to instantly pop up for the new girls or when a girl gets a few real (but shitty) reviews there's suddenly a stunning review. And the emails assuring girls will do things (Nude, b2b, etc.) that they don't. I just look at it this way: I'm about to move from FBSM to the GFE/escort/FS world because of him.
Don't run because of one person, there are plenty of lady's like myself who don't use a screener in the FBSM world. I'm not knocking assistants by any means, I just choose to handle things myself.
It's been a hot min since we talked. Wishing you well
I gave up on body rubs BP a long time ago thanks to Wilma orwhoever she is next week. Incompetence breeds contempt
agree !
There are high end escorts out there you can see for a 1/2 hour session (GFE) for 200 to 225 !
The rates for FBSM are 180 to 220 range for most of his providers and 70% of the time you get a misleading pic and a rub and tug and your out the door in 40 minutes
It's very helpful for searching for providers who offer the services you want at the price point you're shooting for... and who don't short clients on time (you may need to read the Juicy Details for that info). By doing a little research you can easily find quality providers in the 180-220 per hour range who don't use misleading pics and offer much more than a rub and tug.
FWIW my experience has been different from yours; all of my sessions with providers who use "Em" as their assistant have been very good, at minimum. No misleading pics, no shorting on time, and more than a "rub and tug."
I agree !
There are high end escorts out there you can see for a 1/2 hour session (GFE) for 200 to 225 !
The rates for FBSM are 180 to 220 range for most of his providers and 70% of the time you get a misleading pic and a rub and tug and your out the door in 40 minutes
first of all VIP/reviews haven't been valuable since late 2014. get your shit together knots
furthermore, YMMV when it comes to big scheduling. I'm honestly shocked that syndicate continues to operate in today's environ
The reviews have become too unreliable. Guys just aren't objective, and enough reviews by schedulers/friends/girls to make most unreliable/unbelievable. When I personally see a girl who is 40 pounds or more heavier than pics and/or has huge scars, she's not a 7 or 8. I could go on and on but you get the point.
-- Modified on 9/4/2016 8:18:59 PM
it's all cops, screeners, stalkers, and the assorted degenerate board scuzzzzz
that's why i took my game elsewhere. if and when i feel the need, it's all BP for me babies. don't forget to like me on twater for the latest needed updates. after all, if this was the only outlet for misinformation that would be a shame, right LC?
There is GUY who writes CREATIVE and FUN reviews of massage providers. Nearly always he (she?) is the first to review that particular massage provider and always the reviews are positive. His / her experience might be legitimate but it seems a coincidence that these reviews are usually the first reviews for a new provided and are always positive. I'd really like to meet this person and play craps or blackjack with him! My suggestion would be if you see a review that is CREATIVEly written by some GUY and it sounds like a FUN time may be had, wait for 1 or 2 more reviews before you drink the Kool Aid. The recent 2 reviews of Jade Long are just a recent example.
-- Modified on 9/4/2016 8:18:59 PM
.... seen nearly all of the girls reviewed by the reviewer referenced in your reply, and I can GUARANFUCKINTEE they are not all 7, 8, or 9 in looks, and their sessions are not all 7s. No way. No how. And that reviewer is but one of 5 that I am aware of. Guess it's pretty easy when an assistant (humble or not) has his/her own assistants. Just wonder how many there are that I don't know? Doesn't really matter any more as TER has become unreliable because of this. Thought they used to check IPs to prevent multiple accounts. Guess not. Just wish I could run a string of luck like certain other reviewers. Perhaps if I were more dnicer or fun I would.
... from this CREATIVE and FUN GUY and you. There's only 3 reviews in common from what I can tell, but here's how they compare:
- On one review, you both gave exactly the same scores.
- On another review, you both gave the same score for Appearance, but your score was one point lower on Performance. It was interesting to me that you seemed to "ding" the provider for performance for delivering the kind of service you understood that she delivered from reading her reviews. You said you don't like that type of service, but you chose to see her anyway.
- On the third review, your Appearance score was 2 points lower. But as we all know, one man's "hot" can be another man's "one in a million." Your Performance score was also 2 points lower. However, you noted that the main reason for that score was you did not get the full time you paid for, and if she had done that she could easily get 1-2 points more for performance--which would have made the score equal to or just point lower than the score front the other GUY. Maybe he got the full hour? He didn't mention getting shorted on time, at least.
Since your scores aren't much different for the same providers than the CREATIVE, FUN GUY's scores are, is it possible you two are drinking the same Kool Aid?
-- Modified on 9/4/2016 8:18:59 PM
Just a few points on this, and I'm moving on.
1. Who are the three I share in common with CFG? I see only one: Carmen. (However, I have seen but not reviewed, a number of others. But since I didn't review them, they are out of this discussion, but as personal knowledge, I know my scores vs. his.)
2. Last 2+ years only seen 8, 9, 10 with performance 7, 8, 9. How possible is that?
3. My reviews are objective and provide details citing why something is plus or minus. You were able to pull this out of whatever reviews you looked at and attributed to me, but I didn't see you being able to do that with CFG's. I agree that one man's hot can be another's one in a million, so I provide details to support what I write. Overweight. Huge scars. Fake/old pics. Etc.
4. Based on your analysis and summation of the review process where a couple of points don't seem to matter, well then, that pretty much blows away the reason for a scoring system, which wouldn't bother me at all IF guys would just write HONEST and OBJECTIVE reviews and provide details.
It's possible we're drinking the same Kool-Aid. So what flavor is yours
... I wasn't attributing anything to YOU. My post was a reply to Rxyman's post. I even quoted his post so it was clear to whom my post was directed.
But since you asked... I hate Kool Aid, of any flavor.
brown nosing buttholes to drinking kool aid.
But since you asked... I hate Kool Aid, of any flavor.
I think that guy is a little too positive, but I have exchanged messages with him and he seems legit. I have had some good recommendations from him (as I have from you RX!)
My experiences with the Em girls are different than yours. I don't want to out anyone here, but there are a few girls who use very dated pictures and EM or Em assistant send dated pics in the follow-up emails. I can think of a handful of girls off the top of my head. I've been shorted a handful of times myself. And I have had more than a few sessions where I was promised things that were not only not delivered but the girls flat out said they don't do, and I am only talking nude, exchange, b2b not bj or fs. Having written that, I've also had some good luck with some of Em's.
Well, Number 1, I was try to say from that price's point you could be with high end escort for 200 to 250 for the half for a GFE ! ( You know there be no BS.) So why take the chance. 2, Your search brings up false information 80% of the time! There's providers who have been around for years and you see it states a rate 120 and you know it's more like 180 plus because everything hedge's off the first review. I've heard from 3 reliable providers that say these girl write there own review's and getting clients booked one on top off another. So that would make it impossible to get your allotted time.
Also I do have VIP
Just my opinion! no offence meant!
thanks for giving an informed opinion. It's refreshing. No shit
And some wonder why I don't see many providers in MN these days. Pretty obvious, isn't it hahaha.
I agree !
There are high end escorts out there you can see for a 1/2 hour session (GFE) for 200 to 225 !
The rates for FBSM are 180 to 220 range for most of his providers and 70% of the time you get a misleading pic and a rub and tug and your out the door in 40 minutes
How you doing Sir ?
nice to hear from you
vote with your dolla bill
I have seen two people that EM schedules and have found them to be slightly overpriced, but in general, a great visit each time. For one, the pics were a bit flattering, but there is no way at all that they are fake.
I do not like the idea of a scheduler, but I have never had a problem with Em.