Flagging PAID ads does nothing and is pointless they aren't violating TOU.
I'm not the backpage police or an expert but
Boycotting and alerting people does have an effect
so they either get more comfortable or leave altogether and do something else.
only if its absolutely false advertising like the above example though.
Because being on that side myself
I noticed a slight increase in skeptical visitors coinciding with the increase of "tease " providers.
Makes it difficult to decode them of their intentions upon first meeting because some guys don't mind that type of massage gal some do.
But to bash a lady if someone went to them and over stepped their boundaries
or made them uncomfortable so the appointment was declined
or they got spooked so didn't take a chance, that's a big difference .
Regardless they're providing a service and the prices should reflect that.
I mean you can get attractive in tandem HE massage ladies for under $$ rather than a super hot non HE single for $$$.
I know I'm not wrong.
Does not belong in body rubs! Lets get it done. It's easy.
http://www.theeroticreview.net/discussion_boards/viewAll.asp?MessageID=140549&boardID=21&page=3&view=2
And this promises nothing, suggests almost nothing:
http://minneapolis.backpage.com/BodyRubs/special-today-only-sexy-redhead-looking-to-warm-you-up-651-321-3348-kristina-30/5323438
Flag this stupid original post.
What do you care if the woman advertises? If you don't like her or her ad, then don't go visit her. Her ad is no better or worse than many others.
And, how are you going to flag her ad? You going to write to BackPage and tell them that this girl doesn't give handjobs, so she should be banned from BP?
And, finally, why should anyone pay attention to your post when you use an alias? For all anyone knows you are just her competition, or someone with an ax to grind. If you want to throw your weight around, do it with your normal alias.
No one said anything about getting her banned from BP. There is a section for "Therapeutic Massage" which is where this type of ad belongs. IMO
See mikes post. That is the whole point. She does not belong in the body rub section. That is all or are you too dense to know there is a difference between what "body rub" and "theraputic" implys?
I do know the difference. And, I am not so dense as to not know how to spell "therapeutic" or "implies". But, again, what difference does it make to you who advertises any services on Backpage. And, apparently, there are a few men who don't know the difference. If you search my earlier posts, you will see that I also questioned why so many men on this site would 411 women posting in the therapuetic.
And, as my friend Rose suggests, "are you the backpage police?". And, if so, apparently you are undercover, as you are still using your alias. Too afraid to come out in the open?
I don't even like RealP4u, but I agree with him here. Why would anyone care? Why have you taken it upon yourself to be the backpage police?
I wish I had that kind of time on my hands.
Exactly! If she ls paying for the ads its not up to you to decide where they advertise.
Just like we can't tell you who or who not to see.
What do you care if the woman advertises? If you don't like her or her ad, then don't go visit her. Her ad is no better or worse than many others.
And, how are you going to flag her ad? You going to write to BackPage and tell them that this girl doesn't give handjobs, so she should be banned from BP?
And, finally, why should anyone pay attention to your post when you use an alias? For all anyone knows you are just her competition, or someone with an ax to grind. If you want to throw your weight around, do it with your normal alias.
I emailed her a couple of weeks ago with that exact point. Her response was that she is very honest in her ad and that if "body rub" girls can advertise in the Therapeutic section, she can advertise in the body rub section. Makes no sense to me, but that was her response.
Then she is the worst - just being a cocktease to get business. But, then you never know maybe money talks. Personally, I think we are giving these massage only bitches way too much attention here. Proabably what they are hoping for - free publicity.
In other words she is just doing it to get more business without delivering the type of services her choices of advertising suggests. That makes her a scammer in my book.
Flagging PAID ads does nothing and is pointless they aren't violating TOU.
I'm not the backpage police or an expert but
Boycotting and alerting people does have an effect
so they either get more comfortable or leave altogether and do something else.
only if its absolutely false advertising like the above example though.
Because being on that side myself
I noticed a slight increase in skeptical visitors coinciding with the increase of "tease " providers.
Makes it difficult to decode them of their intentions upon first meeting because some guys don't mind that type of massage gal some do.
But to bash a lady if someone went to them and over stepped their boundaries
or made them uncomfortable so the appointment was declined
or they got spooked so didn't take a chance, that's a big difference .
Regardless they're providing a service and the prices should reflect that.
I mean you can get attractive in tandem HE massage ladies for under $$ rather than a super hot non HE single for $$$.
I know I'm not wrong.
That's what I think; flagging them on BP will not accomplish anything. Best thing we can do is try to spread the word on here about their B&S tactics when we see these ads.
-- Modified on 7/11/2011 2:52:46 AM
OK, my new philosophy is that we should make every effort to share information on the body rub providers that, for the most part, provide both lame massag yet hint at much more. I especially don't apprecaite it when they upcharge for wearing less clothes but offer pretty much nothing erotic.
Lisa (the one under discussion here) is certainly in the mix, though I was not offered any upcharged services. Somebody else mentioned lingerie but I can't confirm that. I thinks Lisa walks a difficult path; her full name (which I suspect is real) is easily found on massage anywhere.
"Diana Prince" and "Kaylee" the nude yoga massage lady (former partners) also belong in the list. However, "Diana" seems to have backed off on her Body Rubs ads and sticks to Therapeutic under another name. Kaylee seems to be sticking to Therapeutic also under another name.
I also have a beef with those ladies that primarily advertise on therapeutic but run ads that certainly insinuate that more is "coming". In addition, they are known for upcharging for topless etc. yet delivering nada. I'd nominate Katy and Amber in this category. Amber runs ads in the equivalent of Body Rubs in other outlets and maintains a web presence on adult only sites so she qualifies for additional beefing.
Drea's (as in Katy's partner) recent ads in the lingerie are not quite right either, but I don't think she plays the upcharge game. But expect a DIY situation at most.
Oh yeah, I know if you do a search on me you don't find much. Doesn't mean my opinions are not based on some research.