Just noticed that some tool made gross,tactless comments about one of my atf's.  I've been enjoying this gals company for several years and she always has better than perfect hygiene.  I never miss an opportunity to dine with Hillary and it is always a fantastic experience!! This jerk is lucky she even saw him.

I can't begin to say how pissed I am about Hilary's new reviewer. Total bullshit in my book! NOBODY has better better hygeine than her and all her previous reviews speak volumes to this!  My bet is that its a fake review, or just trying to make her look bad.   Any bets that any gal will ever see this loser from now on?

Classless, really classless!  Keep your head up hun, nobody will give any credence to this fake review anyway.

-- Modified on 3/9/2010 4:33:56 PM

-- Modified on 3/9/2010 5:14:37 PM

I chuckled when I read that one yesterday. What do think the chances are that he'll indeed be granted a second visit after a review like that?

1) He gave her a 9/8 and the overall review was positive
2) He has a 2.5 year review history and has generally given good scores

Perhaps a PM expressing your concern over what he said would have been a better idea?

If someone wanted to see me again despite "not fresh", i would be very happy. No more complaint.

I read the review when it came out a few days ago (since I think Hilary is an incredible beauty and have her selected as one of my "favorites" who I get notice of new reviews on) and nothing about it struck me as mean or unfair or agenda-driven.  I guess he wants us to know his Johnson was too big for Hilary to swallow -- never a problem for me with Hilary.  LOL.    

I am not a DATY guy, so I can't speak to that.  

On other fronts, I read into the review some of my experiences on my visits with Hilary, great and no so great.  I might mention I frequently tell guys that Hilary is the sexiest MILF in the country.  And in my experience she is.

There is nothing in that review that should spark a "white knight" response.

As to the final question by the "White knight" post: will other girls see this reviewer.  Duh?  That is an odd question if you look at the reviewer's list of reviews, and compare them to the ratings given by the "white knight" criticizing the objectivity the reviewer.  The "white knight" has a string of reviews slamming experiences with girls with extremely low ratings.  I remember seeing a similar list of reviews once in another city and thinking "I wonder if that reviewer is actually a competing girl?"  

In the alternative, there is a psychological thing called "projection" that I think might apply here.

One other thought occurred to me.  I remember seeing Hilary once some time back and she was all upset about something a reviewer said about her.

How did she know about what he said about her?

Some guy e-mailed her (apparently someone who contacts her endlessly), like a daddy or something, to say a review had reviewed her and made her sound like a drunk.

So she got all upset.

Because this guy told her about a comment in a review.  Because Hilary hates explicit reviews and does not read her own reviews (part of her courtesan thing, I guess).

But here is the payoff: so she eventually went and actually read the review and all it ACTUALLY said was that Hilary enjoyes a nice bottle of wine, or something to that approximate effect.  

So she commented that there were some guys who contacted her -- bothered her -- all the time with this kind of nonsense.  "Have you seen what someone just said about you in a review" -- are these guys jealous Hilary is seeing someone other than them?

I'm just saying...

Hilary is a big girl and does not need -- and in my limited experience, DOES NOT WANT -- this kind of notoriety on this board.

She is a rare beauty.  Every guy has a slightly different experience.  Let it go.

No one of us is perfect; we all make mistakes and it is possible that Hillary simply had a less than great day that day.  It happens.  It doesn't make her any less good of an escort.  It just makes her human.  None of us were there; we don't know exactly what happened.  But I see no justification for jumping down the reviewer's throat based on the evidence.

This thread has done Hilary no favors because it has brought far more attention to this one review and the small negative part of it than it ever would have received otherwise.

It also gives more ammunition to those who like to wail about the MN board being controlled by white knights who can't stand to see one bad word said about their favorites.  Most of the time it's pure BS but not always.

Vorlon you are so right. And, the Original White Knight's post has been read by hundreds of men who might not be VIP's, and now even they know there was an issue.  And, most hobbiests will take the word of a long time reviewer over a white knight.

I have heard from a few providers, that they wish the white knights would just shut up.