There are ladies, like Alice (wonderland? Haven’t seen her for a while) that are curvy yet not fat. It’s a body type. And that is in my opinion what they should be called. But than there are ladies like Brynn, who ate all the fried chicken from Canes and can barely fit in her XXXL yoga pants. And that is not curvy in my opinion, but rather a lady that is fat. If you consider this derogatory, well what’s the point of this site?
Some guys like the XXXL muffin top look, some guys don’t. Don’t call Brynn “curvy” because her ass is so fat that it requires two plane tickets. It’s a false review. Call her fat, because she is. Guys that want to see fat chicks will thank you for honest reviews. Guys that don’t like fat chicks will know to stay away, and instead research and look for ladies like you have mention, ginger, Ella etc...Please think (twice) before scoring.
Made two appointments recently trusting established reviewers only to find that they were... over generous. Like Dratch instead of Weisz. I'm as easily rendered foolish as anyone else by lipstick, but these scores proved to be ridiculous.
Probably. In fact went straight to write the reviews but there's a second angle -- my reviews would end up calling out both the providers and their reviewers. So we'll see. Nevertheless the point of the post was the point of the post.
Is the common denominator , the Chick-Fil-A Harem Masters? Shouldn’t be surprised if that’s the case. Or bona fide independents?
The reality is, do you really know whose having a threesome on your dime . The fanboys, or some of the called trusted ones.
And all the Hoes and fanboys that were all up in it , on the fuckery must stop, should be with you if your facts line up. But wouldn’t hold your breath on that. After all it’s money we are talking about. Theirs not yours.
Best policy is the no “ marriage “ , you can know some of the side gigs, but are you going to know them all probably not. But there are plenty.
Reviews lose so much of their value if only good ones are given. You could help fellow hobbyists avoid spending their money on someone they won't have a good time with.
Maybe it's just more fun to complain and do nothing about it?
For me Brynn is an example. I saw her a while ago, when TER went on vacation. Since then I’ve seen reviews of her come in, thinking what the actual fuck are people seeing in her? My opinion of her looks and service was vastly different than what recent reviews say.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess, and to each their own but god damn do I find Brynn so fucking ugly. But the next guy may like muffin top chicks that jiggle like 30 day old jello.
Happens all the time. Look at the ton of reviews for Tessa Tease where she is getting 7's and 8's for appearance. I don't get it. I should've walked when she greeted me at the door. But I went through with it but couldn't get out of there fast enough.
Completely agree with Tessa Tease, I should have ran as she was so homely I couldn’t get hard. She also admitted something to me that was scary too.
If this is an issue to you, write your reviews. Solely complaining about it does a disservice to the honest reviews and comes off as you simply wanting an echo chamber to complain to.
Stop being a do nothing and write the review. Everyone active here wants a honest reviews or in this case a review. It's not an unpopular opinion. The fact that you not writing the review refuting the other reviews adds to that problem of others being duped by other over exaggerate reviews.
So be a part of the solution and write the review. Or are we going to have another "unpopular" opinion from you instead?
Pissing into the wind is bad - a book from LockStock
121 to 6. #121 posted yesterday. Perhaps I was too easily pissed off by what felt like a patronizing post. I am very grateful for your 6.
-- Modified on 11/6/2020 12:53:08 PM
This has been an issue for me here for a while now. I’ve learned to take other folks ratings of looks with a grain of salt. If I can’t see their face and full body in their ad pics, I assume they’re hiding something, regardless of what the reviews say. There’s one I saw recently who had really good photos and all really good reviews. I was very disappointed when I got there, because it wasn’t even close. Nothing about her warranted the reviews she got previously.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, frankly some of these reviewers would fuck anything better lookin than their wives and that covers alot of ground.Some reviewers i trust there judgement, most dont have a clue. Others embelish there stories to make themselves out to be pornstars. And others seem to have enough money to fuck every gal who comes to the city. Anyway one things for sure, we all like a good fuck story and all have great memories of those encounters of when everything clicks, thats why we continue our search for the perfect poon.
We can’t depend on the numbers alone because one guy’s 9 is another guy’s 6. So don’t just give a number on Appearance—give enough of a description so the reader can get a better idea if there’s any blockers for him.
Example: some guys think “models” must be slim and maybe busty also. But there’s curvy models like Tara Lynn, and there’s fitness models with muscle, and there’s lots of A-cup models. So if you give a 9 and the provider doesn’t fit the model stereotype, or even if she does, give a description.
Likewise if you give an 8, explain why the woman is “really hot” in your mind. For example, one provider I rated 8 (and explained why) was rated 5 by someone else because her face wasn’t hot enough for him, while I thought she had a very nice face.
Another aid is to state that the provider’s pics are accurate—or not (and explain why not). But the problem there is that appearance can change over time, while the pics might not keep up. So if the review isn’t recent, don’t rely on “her pics are accurate”. That’s where the description helps a lot.
This is the part most guys forget. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There are some women who I see as a 10 but some of you will see as a 7 or an 8. I think if a woman falls out of what we think of stereotypical model material, then definitely provide some details on the appearance. I actually prefer curvy women and from what I can tell with scores, that's the normal here hence why they have lower appearance scores. That in turn lends itself to another debate: where is the line between curvy, thick, plus size, and fat? I'll let you all duke it out.
I think a description of her appearance should always be included because of the subjectivity of it. In particular, I find the 9 - Model Material score misleading because I've seen models I didn't find particularly attractive and I've seen women that are not the type I've ever scene as models but I believe are worthy of a 9.
Some review pet peeves
-“who was I to argue?” Let’s get more creative and descriptive, less cliche
- missing details such as BBBJ vs CBJ, CIM or swallow, I won’t even touch the third rail topic, but glossing over details that are important to carefully describe how you moved from one act to the other, we can all do better
on the looks, I feel like there is a code. If a provider goes above and beyond, is GFE, that’s worth 2-3 points in looks. There are smoking hot providers I’ve seen that many score a 6-8 in looks because they didn’t kiss or BBBJ. That’s why there are two scores! But anyway, if a provider is a 6 looks 8 performance, that means usually somewhat homely. 9 6 is a smoke show.
I also assume there are a lot of men in their 70s or 80s so their impression of what’s hot is going to be very different from 30s or 40s. But the scores are ridiculous in a lot of cases.
Agree largely with the "code" as you describe it. But it takes review experience to get those interpretative and writing skills. And clearly those skills, or that code, have failed me recently.
I think the proliferation of massage women has both multiplied the options and screwed the reviews at the same time.
It might help if TER got a stricter again in asking for juicy details.
I wonder when the last time was that they rejected a review on those grounds? It used to happen all the time.
I have to ask how did you know it used to happen all the time?
Before I knew TER was back, I was on the Chimp. Piper Raine, Cate Marie Smith and Brandi...really??? Chloe and Malory, wow so disappointing and had many great reviews.
Most of my sessions are with well established providers with great reviews. I have just started to play in the ME world, but based on experienced reviewers, I am really doing well.
What the hell does Curvy mean? I have ran into some big girls aka...curvy? More like flabby and 40+ lbs overweight. That being said, I have ran into a few aka curvy that carry it well.
...usually the whole lady. But some big boobed chicks also use the word curvy.