Minnesota

PSA: If a cover was used…
knotsaway 36 Reviews 1645 reads
posted

… especially for FS, PLEASE MENTION IT IN YOUR REVIEW!

It’s not fair to providers who don’t offer BBFS to imply they do.  (Same for BBBJ, for that matter.)

Thank you.

hopalong42037 reads

This topic should be fun but there's already a few threads on it.
If they didn't use one, most guys aren't going to say that. I don't think I would.
Wasn't there TER rules against saying it?
Not using one is really pushing your luck with providers taking different dicks 100s or 1000s of times. What are going to tell your SO? You got it from a toilet seat?
Guys lie. Simple truth. Who's gonna believe it?
I hate the F'n things as much as the next guy but dam I like my dick too much.
If you think you're special and only you are getting the offer, think again.
Who said life was fair anyhow.

Next up!

However, they dropped that restriction some years ago.

Guys will lie and say they used one when they didn't too so take it with a grain of salt when they say they used a cover. No one in their right mind would say they went bbfs.. though I know some people have and have said they did.

I would say it's a little more than not fair...

Ok I am confused ......are we talking about PSA which is prostate specific antigen ? or something else ??  to my understanding PSA really has nothing to do with a sexually transmitted disease which i am assuming this thread implies. The only related connection of a PSA number is the relationship of the dick to the nuts to the prostate and I do not believe that you can catch a prostate cancer (maybe an infection ((prostatitis)) but different bacteria not your typical STD group) so we are talking about BBFS as if the PSA number is at risk to be elevated due to sex. If someone on here can educate me I am open...... but that  is definitely not a reason to be wary of vaginal sex covered or not (different thread beat to death) ......truthfully the mouth (BBBJ) is much more of a cesspool of bacteria if you are going to worry about diseases.

And Knots is right.  Reading through reviews lately could leave one with the impression that every other provider is offering BBFS when in all likelihood most of them are not.  Providers do not need to deal with guys showing up expecting BBFS because of ambiguous reviews.

I wish knotsaway would explain his words in the original thread cuz I did know how to respond to what he was even implying by those 2 sentences.....OB 1 ....help me here :)

I don’t know how I can make it more clear. Does everyone except johnstern447 have a reading comprehension problem?

One more time:  If you have FS with a provider and a cover, aka condom, was used, mention that fact if you write a review. Otherwise we don’t know if it was BBFS or you just didn’t bother to mention the cover.
 
Not mentioning the cover when it was used can hurt providers who don’t offer BBFS, and it’s not helpful to everyone who uses reviews to find providers who they want to meet.  

Makes sense to me...  
Knowing if protection was used or not is good thing to know in my book!!!

Register Now!