Minnesota

Posting again
chipper10hr 36 Reviews 105 reads
posted
2 / 16

I reached out to her, or someone using those same pics, on Seeking.  No response there. Could be an SB dipping her toe into the Pro world, or a Pro using Seeking to generate extra business.  One thing I noticed is in the nude pic, she has a few moles, one near her collarbone.  Those are not present in the other two or the additional pics she has posted on Seeking. Could be edited, who knows.

JohnnyCumLately 115 Reviews 100 reads
posted
3 / 16

She has a profile on SA with more photos.  I’m not sure it’s allowed to post her SA profile on here but I will be happy to do so if someone can let me know what the rule is for that.  For those who use SA, there are tons of familiar faces on that site that also advertise on MNErotica and other escort sites.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 86 reads
posted
4 / 16

Generally I'd avoid publicly linking a sugar babe's ID to her pro ID. It can cause her problems, banishment.

vorlon 119 Reviews 90 reads
posted
5 / 16

If her SA profile contains information about her real life id, TER could ban you for doing that.

Frenchalps 90 reads
posted
6 / 16

She’s posting again after taking a break. Either once in a lifetime or more realistically B&S or LE. 🤣

OldRanger 62 Reviews 90 reads
posted
7 / 16

Not only posting but has a review .
Personally if even thinking of the young ones would not go there.
If real and per review is a Unicorn at least for a little while.  
If not a lot of red flags and stainless bracelets.

Added review link

-- Modified on 12/13/2022 5:52:35 PM

-- Modified on 12/13/2022 6:00:25 PM

zeezai 72 Reviews 101 reads
posted
8 / 16

So the one review posted by chillguy also posted only one other review with another girl name lucy. Apprently he is such a player that he got two in a row offering bbfs to him.
I was able to get in touch with lucy few weeks back and she asked for two photos and real name to book apt. I offered references, etc but nope, send photos. I did not send anything and that was it but to me that was red flag. This review for sure raises more red flag not only on these offers but review by same person too.
Thread carefully my friends.

vorlon 119 Reviews 80 reads
posted
9 / 16

Or their common reviewer either.  There's enough red flags to cause a herd of bulls to stampede.

gary55012 19 Reviews 93 reads
posted
10 / 16

As soon as I clicked on the ad link I knew I had seen her pictures before. It was more than a year ago and the ad was offering the same bbfs. Unfortunately after searching I can't locate the ad or picture but stay away for sure!!! LE

jollyranger 52 Reviews 122 reads
posted
11 / 16

I don’t think Amy was legit, but I have seen Lucy a couple of times and she is legit. She has that innocent MILF vibe going on. Only thing about her most recent review, it isn’t 100% accurate, as she doesn’t do bbfs, but does offer a FC2 and that may have lead to his confusion.

jollyranger 52 Reviews 95 reads
posted
12 / 16

Lucy is waiting for her Tryst ad to be approved, which should be any day and I will post a more accurate review of her. Meanwhile feel free to PM with any questions about her.

-- Modified on 12/27/2022 9:28:07 AM

vorlon 119 Reviews 80 reads
posted
13 / 16
jollyranger 52 Reviews 87 reads
posted
14 / 16

I will do a review when her new Tryst ad hits. Meanwhile PM with any questions, but I highly suggest seeing her.

MnBlackdiamonds 2 Reviews 88 reads
posted
15 / 16

Please do submit a legit review about her when you can. Thx

vorlon 119 Reviews 79 reads
posted
16 / 16
Register Now!